It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A South Carolina man says his constitutional rights have been violated after he was told by his local government to remove the Bible-themed signs he had posted on his property.
Oscar Moultrie says a Berkeley County, S.C., ordinance that requires residents to obtain government permission before putting up signs on their private property -- other than "for sale," "for rent," political signs, and a few other exceptions -- violates his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
His Lawsuite
Whitehead says it's vital that the court step in -- and not just for Moultrie's benefit. He says that because the ordinance defines a sign as any structure or device that "transmits information or an idea," the county could prevent people from displaying just about anything on their private property -- including religious holiday decorations.
County Code
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...a lot of places have restrictions on what kind of signs you can put in your front yard and how long you can leave them there...
...is it unconstitutional?... i'll have to think about it awhile because i already have a prejudiced view - which is - i wouldnt want that guy in my hood - not because of what his signs say - but because all those signs are tacky and junks up the place...
...will be interesting to see what kind of support he gets...
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Annee
thats just the point tho, your personal views of religion should have no bearing on whats right and wrong....
People want to cry all the time separation of church and state......and that there shouldnt be religious material on public or gov owned property.......
Well then its MY contention that this same gov, state, or city body has NO right to tell this man he cant have religious material on his own property......
Regardless of how they think it looks, exploiting loopholes because of what his yard might "look like" to satisfy an agenda isnt any more innocent then taking them off his land by force.
I think its come to the point in this country (mind you im a spiritual person and dont subscribe to one religion) that the Christian people in this nation are starting to get very very tired of all of the infringement of THEIR rights, over the rights of other people, while other religious bodies get away with the same things.
Add that to the continued attrocities of the ACLU and things are not looking like they could boil over
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by Annee
thats just the point tho, your personal views of religion should have no bearing on whats right and wrong....
People want to cry all the time separation of church and state......and that there shouldnt be religious material on public or gov owned property.......
Originally posted by TruthWizard
A person should have the right to put whatever sign they want on their property no matter what it says, It is after all their property.
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
I guess you do not believe in private property rights.
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
You know use your property the way you want as long as it is not spilling on to others.
Which means junkie cars, animals, tall grass.
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
To many that believe as you do, do not care about sovereign rights.
the ordinance defines a sign as any structure or device that "transmits information or an idea,"
Originally posted by TruthWizard
A person should have the right to put whatever sign they want on their property no matter what it says, It is after all their property.