It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jakko
That's not even the New Testament you're talking about...
I'm not generalising, just stating facts. The Koran "borrowed" parts from the bible, period. Not the other way around.
And Christianity did not borrow any ideas from any religion, and don't worry, I'm not going to feel dissed no matter how many flawed theories you can come up with.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Please expound. People are always saying that there are blatant contridictions in the Bible, but have yet to back it up with good examples.
Like what you just said above....please explain. When Jesus said that God was his father, I guess people assumed that meant he was the son of God. But you're saying that didn't mean that?
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
show me some proof that mary wasn't a virgin... please! I would like to hear it, or read it. Another question, why would i convert to islam if jesus came again? And what i am saying is that if Jesus comes and takes his followers, as stated in the rapture, back to heaven. Suddenly, you see that people are missing, don't believe anything said by anyone, just have faith that jesus came and got his followers, and convert. Islam is and always has been threatened by one man, Jesus Christ.
Originally posted by DaTruth
They are not theories they are facts weather you want to not acknowledge them or not. You can also over look the bible quotes that I posted too. Ignorance does that to people
[edit on 29-6-2004 by DaTruth]
Originally posted by stalkingwolf
what if there was an "original civilization" say 75,000 or 100,000 yrs ago, that
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by stalkingwolf
what if there was an "original civilization" say 75,000 or 100,000 yrs ago, that
Graham Handcock "Fingerprints of the Gods", right?
Originally posted by Leveller
The problem that Muslims and Jews have with Christianity is that they can't bear the thought of their god coming to Earth as a human being.
What they both totally overlook is the fact that their own faiths depict him as appearing as a man in their own scriptures.
Originally posted by mithras
You're mistaken, Islam doesn't depict God. Certainly not as a man, and certainly not as a man coming to Earth.
Originally posted by KSoze
The originals were lost POSSIBLY sometime before?
Are the Dead sea Scrolls corrupt? There isn't anything in there supporting The Qu'ran version of biblical events. I really hope you tell me the qu'ran says they were corrupted before 150-300 BC. For your own sakes.
I find it very disturbing that you, a muslim, do not even know how the
Qu'ran was verified, by whom, or what methods were used. It does not take a historian to research it. You cannot explain it therefore you do not understand it. Your putting your eternal salvation into this. It is in your best interest to know these things. Its very important stuff! You say that given evidence one explaination is more likely. However, you have forgot to even look into the most critical of evidence...How the Qu'ran came to be...
I asked anyone if the original sources were availible. I received no answer. It would only be in the islams best interest if they were availible. If they are not, there's probably a good reason for it. Most likely because political and human agenda crept into your qu'ran.
Anyways, I've researched enough of this to realize that the qu'ran you have is not god-breathed; it is not the most likely explanation. It is a compilation work. There were many hands involved and this is evident by the incoherency of its pages.
A very brief history:
There are various traditions of the compilation of the qu'ran. The compilation of Abu Bakr and that of Uthman. There are others as well. Today, it is ASSUMED that the Uthman text is correct but they give no substantial reasons for discarding the Bakr text. This Uthman text was compiled atleast 20 yrs AFTER muhammed.
This amazes me...You muslims criticize the christians because they have late evidence; yet your own is Late...The same criteria you have used to judge the christians can be used against you.
Memorization also played a role in the compilation of the qu'ran. It is very possible that the memorization abilities of the early muslims is an exaggeration. Memorizing over a hundred verses perfectly is a difficult task. Is it possible they forgot something, is it possible human error and influence reigned? In addition, we know that traditions vary when they are passed down orally. That is what muslims assert happened to the gospels, correct?
What is the first mention of Muhammed in literature that we have? How many years AFTER his death is this source dated to?
These are the types of questions muslims attack the christian, judaism evidence with, its only fair you treat your own beliefs the same way.
In summary, a variety of sources were used along with selective data acquiring. There were numerous variants of the text in the first three centuries of Islam. The details are availible for anyone that wants to search for it; I'm not writing a book.
In addition, There is more evidence that parts of the quran have been lost. If parts have been lost then it's plausible that it has been added to as well. Here ya go:
As-Suyuti, a commentator of the Koran quotes Ibn Khattab as saying:
"Let no one of you say that he has aquired the entire quran , for how does he know that it is all? Much of the Quran has been lost and thus let him say. 'I have aquired of it what is availible."
-all of this coming from a MUSLIM
Mithras your so called evidence of Islam isn't evidence at all: 1)The qu'ran-I've shown how shaky its foundations are 2) the hadiths contradict the qu'ran and only make islam look bad; it is dated VERY LATE 3) wiping out civilizations-so what, Caesar wiped out tons of people.
Mithra, we as humans must believe in some things, but its not necessary for any of us to believe one religion has all the answers.
Originally posted by Leveller
I beg to differ.
Sura 53 1-18.
The Koran also gives Allah many human attributes - hands, feet, eyes, a face, a waist. Basically a human form.
Originally posted by wooten123
Mithras, here we go. First of all my belief in the Great Spirit has nothing to do with your ....
Originally posted by Jakko
Originally posted by DaTruth
They are not theories they are facts weather you want to not acknowledge them or not. You can also over look the bible quotes that I posted too. Ignorance does that to people
[edit on 29-6-2004 by DaTruth]
So far, all "proof" for these facts was debunked.
I did not say these things without knowing what I'm talking about. I've spend some time trying to find out what religion "inspired" what other religion, and Christianity is simply not based on the Koran, it's the other way around.
Originally posted by Leveller
The problem that Muslims and Jews have with Christianity is that they can't bear the thought of their god coming to Earth as a human being.
What they both totally overlook is the fact that their own faiths depict him as appearing as a man in their own scriptures.
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
If the bible is corrupt, and the Koran is correct, why is it that all of the Holy Bible's prophecies coming true with an astonishing rate of 100%? You giving us versus from a false prophet proves nothing.
Originally posted by mithras
Let me know if you still beg to differ.
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by mithras
Let me know if you still beg to differ.
Yes I do. Read the words and you will see that they refer to human body parts. The fact that you put your own translation to them to make them mean something else in the definition is neither here nor there.
The unassailable fact is that the Koran gives Allah human form. Just because the religion tried to wipe this out by giving you another way of putting them into context does not mean that they don't exist.
It's up to you to prove to me that the Koran doesn't describe the physical Allah. I'm afraid that is something you cannot do.
By the way. If you want, we can add other body parts - shin and ass are just two.