It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by mpbdsnu
Mpbdsnu.....
I agree. Its 100% fake. By zooming in close enough (at least by 600%) you can see the work that was done to blend the colour in with the background. Why do people try this on?
Did you have a chance to read that which was written about this issue?
As per the expert commentary in this & many other threads, I don't think you can draw that conclusion based on the available information.
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
you can see the work that was done to blend the colour in with the background.
Any info on details of witnesses.
Originally posted by smurfy
What about the police drones that were withdrawn this year. They are only 70cm in size. The same drone is available to the emergency services and military as well. It's worth a thought if only to exclude it.
This is hilarious
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
TeslaandLyne.....
This is hilarious
I'm not sure I'm with you.....
What "is hilarious"?
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
TeslaandLyne.....
Any info on details of witnesses.
L1U2C3I4F5E6R posted details about the sightings (including information pertaining to witnesses) on several occasions.
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
edit on 3-10-2010 by Maybe...maybe not because: Clarification
ED: So was it smoky and like a dark rain cloud perhaps. The photos seem to pick up black images.
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by torsion
I think you're on to something I think we have a serial hoaxer on our hands, reminds me of the Greenville triangle UFO hoaxer.
edit on 3-10-2010 by cripmeister because: just because
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by CHRLZ
So you are saying that can not possibly be a ship.
That its a photographic artifact.
Thanks for the review cause it looks similar to a eyewitness drawing
of a very large craft.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by CHRLZ
So you are saying that can not possibly be a ship. That its a photographic artifact. Thanks for the review cause it looks similar to a eyewitness drawing of a very large craft.
So you are saying that can not possibly be a ship.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by torsion
I think you're on to something I think we have a serial hoaxer on our hands, reminds me of the Greenville triangle UFO hoaxer.
edit on 3-10-2010 by cripmeister because: just because
The strange halo surrounding the object and the vertical lines.
Just ignore those for a cause.
ED:from a sighting:
There was a ‘dark space” around its immediate periphery, beyond which there was a purplish “Tesla corona”, which extended out for some distance in advance of the ship, and fanned out along the sides as it moved through space. A ship of that size would be large enough to carry a whole battalion.
edit on 10/3/2010 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
So lets say i did photo shop it, then why would I do that with such a poor "UFO" pic and not paste in something that looks far more believable and clear.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by smurfy
What about the police drones that were withdrawn this year. They are only 70cm in size. The same drone is available to the emergency services and military as well. It's worth a thought if only to exclude it.
Smurfy.....
I included some information here pertaining to police UAV's.
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by DaRAGE
clearly photoshopped.
look at the distorsions around the object.
Cut and pasted and blended.
If it was a real photo it wouldn't have that nonsensical lines around that are from a clear cut and paste.
Originally posted by cripmeister
Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
So lets say i did photo shop it, then why would I do that with such a poor "UFO" pic and not paste in something that looks far more believable and clear.
If you've been around the board for a while (and I think you have) you know that stuff that looks "believable and clear" usually equals hoax. The lifespan of a blob photo (look at the Sydney UFO thread for example) is usually longer than that of a typical saucer photo.