posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 11:59 AM
Originally posted by Imtor
reply to post by greyer
No, I am saying it is not likely for such a large base to be hidden there, if the show that I have already watched were to state correctly - the
diameter of the base is nearly that of the Mesa. And for such a large base to be not noticed and partially not seen seems impossible. It either has to
be much smaller or not there at all.
Also I have previously posted the video with presentation showing some cracks in the ground where supposedly vents could be found, well from the
picture it was just a crack, there wasn't a picture of how deep this fissure goes.
I guess everybody really thinks it is the Mesa because that is the famous part of the story, it never was the Archuletta Mesa, it was deep, deep into
the mountains 20 miles away. There are different interpretations of the base, the cylindrical one I cannot find anymore on the internet, information
on this has been lost and been clouded, partly from Lear and other researchers who knew him. Here is a lost document that was available in March of
THE DULCE PAPERS
The True Origin
This special report reveals the origin of the Dulce Base rumors. Compiled by author of "THE BENNEWITZ PAPERS". Includes new and old information never
before published, with recent updates on underground bases. 150+ pages of photos of Dulce area and true stories behind the most controversial case of
Christa Tilton of CRUX Publishing, 2163 South 78th E. Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74129-2421
The reality is that it is very logical for a base of the beings who were behind the abductions and strange sightings for years before to be located by
the 4 corners because most of the cattle abductions took place to the north and human abductions to the south in Texas. Surely it appears these
beings are interdimensional so I'm not sure the base would be cylindrical or a cube because it may not occupy the same space and time of our world.
In the documentary Overlords Of The UFO from 1976 there are some very questionable peices of information. There is government USAF document from the
department of physics called Introductory Space Science Vol II, it talks about how our physics may not apply to alien controlled UFOs.
The existence of at least 3 or possibly 4 different groups of aliens, the Air Force academy text admonishes its officers in training to keep an
open mind on the baffling subject of UFOs.
It appears the 1976 documentary was telling us something we didn't really want to hear, at a time when the most sightings, landings, and strange
events were taking place with reports of the US government having knowledge of a cover-up we are being told by a narrator that surely there are 3
different types of aliens in reference to the government and he is not telling us how or why.
Also I have lost any trust in John Lear, he seems to be saying whatever he wants. Buildings on the Moon, Dulce, Reptilians - he says it all
without even thinking, it's like he wants to believe or he likes to lie and mislead without batting an eye
Chris Lambright says that John Lear got into a big fued with Paul Bennewitz, this is most likely because John took the Dulce information and gave it
to his counter intelligence researchers to scramble and give to the public.
edit on 27-10-2012 by greyer because: (no reason given)