3 Species of man? 80 000 years?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:23 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by halfoldman

If there are three species of humans, what makes them different as species; and what makes them human?
How do we know that currently there is but one variation on a singular species of human?


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:31 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by halfoldman

Believers in human evolution - I want to know.
Was there more than one species of man alive at one point?
What is the proof?



reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:33 PM by pepsi78
reply to post by halfoldman

The serpent people, the mix and the pure, these are the 3.
The serpent people to the right the mix in the middle and the pure to the left.
The mixt is the majority, the rest meaning the other two are rare cases.
The serpent people are the iluminated ones, the mixt is your avrarage human the pure is the first to walk on this earth.

The serpent has low feelings and is highly advanced in tehnology and magic tricks.
The mixt are avrage humans with a bit of logical mind and a bit of spiritual side. The pure is pure spiritual, it's the person that does not need a magic book, because it has it in it's mind on command it can snap and bring into focus what it wants.

So that are the 3 sorts in my view. The machine, the cyborg(the majority half half) and the dreamer. For some reason we can't coexist because the sun machine is radical, the serpents, they think they own this place but they don't. If they can't coexist with the others then they will take the blame and fall very soon. They want plastic bodies for everybody, how twisted up can you get. Have you not seen terminator, or that movie where everybody is fake and their bodies are plastic, they own the movie industry, it's what they want, for everybody to be like them, if I can't feel then no one can, something like that.


Shortly put.
The anunaki.
The mixt.
The lemurian.
The mixt allways gets in the cross fire.

You should see it, they put it out there for people to see it, but everybody is cauth up in their farts so deep that they just see a tv show.

Battle star galactica ?
It's the perfect interpretation.
The robots, the mixt and the humans, capitan "adam"a
Maybe we can find a way out of this mess.



[edit on 2-9-2010 by pepsi78]


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:40 PM by Xcalibur254
reply to post by halfoldman


Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis did coexist, however it is unlikely that there were any Homo erectus left. Both H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis evolved from H. heidelbergensis, which itself was very similar to H. erectus, but evolved hundreds of thousands of years later.


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:44 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by halfoldman

Perhaps it begs the question of the greatest anthropoligal blasphemy:
Does "Homo Erectus" still walk with us?



reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 07:58 PM by LifeInDeath
That scene always bothered me. It's been a long time since I've seen the movie, but I think you are right that there are three distinct types of people being depicted. The much more ape-like proto-humans who attack the Neanderthals, the Neanderthals themselves and then the Cro-Magnons who are much more advanced technologically (those who are us). I don't think those much more primitive people who attack the Neanderthals were in the right time period. Maybe there was at that time some debate as to whether there was some overlap, but I'm pretty certain there wouldn't have been.

The Homo Floresiensis bones they found a few years ago - the so called "Hobbit" found on the island of Flores in Indonesia are still being debated, but increasingly it seems they are gaining acceptance as a newly discovered species of man, and they seem to have died out only 13,000 years ago (and some thing they may have even been around much more recently, since local legends on the island still talk about little people just like them). So, if Foresiensis is indeed a distinct species that persisted until only 13,000 years ago, then yes, a third group shared the Earth with us and the Neanderthals for quite some time.

I still also wonder about the so-called "monkey people" Alexander the Great's army apparently encountered and fought with when they were in India. They were distinctly described as very primitive, physically different and not at all like the civilized humans of the Indian kingdoms they fought against. It's one of the strangest things described in the histories of Alexander and nobody is sure what or who they describe.

[edit on 9/2/2010 by LifeInDeath]


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 08:19 PM by star in a jar
There's another one- possibly Homo Floresiensis, who supposedly lived up until 12,000 years ago.

en.wikipedia.org...

The discoverers also proposed that H. floresiensis lived contemporaneously with modern humans (Homo sapiens) on Flores.


There's also an account somewhere that the people who live on Flores (modern humans of course) have family stories of a strange people 'Who spoke with a strange murmur'


[edit on 2-9-2010 by star in a jar]

[edit on 2-9-2010 by star in a jar]


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 08:26 PM by SantaClaus
reply to post by star in a jar


I read about Flo about 3 days ago. It is truly an amazing find. Tiny little creatures that looked like erectus but had the brain capacity of chimpanzees. They also climbed.

Can you imagine having these creatures around today? They were EXTREMELY similar in build and appearance to humans, but lacked the brain power and still had some of the physical capacities of their evolutionary ancestors. I though about it at length, and I dare say I'd be downright creeped out.


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 08:54 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by SantaClaus

It's like we're waiting for "disclosure" and some humanoid race to arrive.
But our past tells us there were others species of humans.
Knowing our capacity for violence, and judging by our past (according to one Discovery program there were up to 5 species of humans alive) I don't think disclosure should happen.


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 10:07 PM by star in a jar
reply to post by SantaClaus
I agree, it would be creepy in a strange, but beautiful way- I wonder if Homo Sapien and Homo Floresiensis interbred together like they say Homo Sapien and Homo Neanderthalensis must have done at some points but the characteristics have been diluted over generations.

The fact that there are stories about these people on Flores make me go 'hmmm'.

Admittedly, there's not much to this story other than old bones of a single individual.


reply posted on 2-9-2010 @ 10:16 PM by salman rushdie
reply to post by halfoldman


If I were a betting man, I'd say that we killed the other species off through war. We probably survived because we were the most violent. If one were to look for one of the most common and consistent threads in our history, it's clear that one would conclude that our main occupation is war and we likely have always been this way.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 15 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 9 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 13 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 17 days ago with 34 member flags
Is the wind alive, a living organism? (speculative)
  Posted 19 days ago with 19 member flags