 |
|
Topic started on 21-6-2004 @ 01:17 PM by AboveTopSecret.com
|
BOEING-SIKORSKY
RAH-66 COMANCHE STEALTH HELICOPTER

The
Boeing Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche is the world's most advanced
helicopter and the cornerstone of the U.S. Army's Force XXI
aviation modernization plan. The Comanche makes use of the latest
advancements in aerospace technology, including stealth which
has until now been confined to airplanes.
Abilities
The sophisticated design of the Comanche helicopter allows it
to dash to a speed of 175 knots, then cruise at a steady 165.
The futuristic propulsion and navigation design also allows
the helicopter to execute snap turns in 4.5 seconds and fly
sideways or backwards at an incredible 70 mph! With a tremendous
power output of 1,432 horsepower from each of it's turboshafts,
the Comanche climbs at a rate of 1,418 feet per minute.
Firepower
The Comanche can go to war with up to 14 "Fire and Forget" Hellfire
anti-tank missiles, which, once fired, are programmed to control
their own flight to their targets. The helicopter can also deploy
up to 56 rockets (70mm), or 28 Stinger air-to-air missiles,
to attack fixed and rotary-wing targets.
Alternatively, it can carry two 430-gallon ferry tanks to self-deploy
over 1,260 nm, or crashworthy 230-gallon tanks for more than
four hours of combat endurance.
Adding to its already immense firepower, the Comanche also stows
a three-barreled, 20 mm turreted nose mini-gun that can shoot
1500 rounds per minute.
To maintain its low "stealth" profile, the Comanche features a
fully retractable missile armament system, enabling it to hide
missiles and rockets in I-RAMS (Integrated Retractable Munitions
Systems) bays.
Inside
Comanche
Designed
using computer databases, Comanche redefines the helicopter in
terms of power, maneuverability, technological sophistication,
and materials engineering. Twin LHTEC-800-LHT-801 turboshaft engines
drive an advanced five-blade, bearingless main rotor which further
enhances high performance and agility in air-to-air combat. Its
FANTAIL anti-torque tail rotor system lets Comanche execute amazing
maneuvers near impossible for other helicopters.
Comanche also features reconfigurable, fault-tolerant digital
missions electronics and on-board diagnostics, Longbow fire-control
radar, triple-redundant fly-by-wire flight control and simple,
remove-and-replace maintenance.
A wide-field-of-view, helmet-mounted display provides flight information,
night vision sensors and a sight system for use with weapons.
|
The
Helmet Integrated Display and Sight System (HIDSS) is a biocular
helmet-mounted
display for flight information and night vision sensors and
a sight system for use with weapons.
Each
crewmember has a helmet providing acoustic and impact protection
and a magnetic helmet
tracker on a removable frame. The HIDSS can combine flight
symbology with sensor images to
allow aggressive flight maneuvering at night.
Display:
Bi-Occular, FOV 53? x 30? CRT High resolution tester 1023
line rate. |
In
addition, the RAH-66's Hands On Grips controls literally let pilots
fly and perform mission tasks with one hand - a first-ever achievement
in a helicopter.
The Comanche also breaks new ground in the use of high technology
composites to satisfy both Low Observable Technology requirements
and aggressive weight and cost specifications.
Stealth
Warrior in the Digital Battlefield
Its on-board computing capability enables Comanche to acquire,
process, analyze and disseminate an amount of information unsurpassed
by today's helicopters. Comanche's low radar signature, high technology
composites, special acoustics design, and a buried exhaust system,
make it less observable than today's premier attack and armed
reconnaissance helicopters.
Add to this new generation of passive long-range, high-resolution
battlefield sensors, digital interconnectivity, to share data
with other members of the combined arms team, produces a completely
integrated targeting, and communications weapon system, facilitating
the delivery of quick, coordinated responses to tactical situations
with minimal work for the pilot.
Source
information was used with permission from Boeing-Sikorsky
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-6-2004 @ 12:49 AM by WestPoint23
|
i am still sad they canceled the program hope they reactivated
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-6-2004 @ 10:42 AM by HHH1224
|
According to the History Channel the Comanche project is still in operation and they have a full operating prototype. And if I remember right it is
planned to come into full operating status by 2010.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-6-2004 @ 10:43 AM by browha
|
There was a large controvesy here when they said it was cancelled... It is sad that it has been cancelled, as it is a beautiful helicopter
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-6-2004 @ 07:33 AM by FredT
|
Originally posted by browha
There was a large controvesy here when they said it was cancelled... It is sad that it has been cancelled, as it is a beautiful helicopter 
Given the Army's experience with the Apaches in Iraq, the Commanche would have been too expensive to risk to some 14 year old with an AK. I agree
with you it was a cool bird. Hopefully its technology will move its way into other projects.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 10:17 AM by sfz5
|
Where is the link I can used to validate this?
thanks,
sfz5
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 10:35 AM by FredT
|
While I am a fan of the Commanche, did it really have a place in future conflicts? Even as a scout? I would be be very surprised if another army ever
confronts the US head on and in the open. The Army's experience in SOmalia and GWII showed they were really vulnerable to small arms fire. Would'nt
want a gomer with an AK to take one out. I hope that the technology makes its way into other ships in the future...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 11:37 AM by WestPoint23
|
As sad as I am to say this it was cancelled due to cheaper smaller more reliable and stealthier UCAVS and drones in the cammache main role was scout
and some attack we can achieve this with cheaper UCAVS without risking human life.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 11:57 AM by E_T
|
Originally posted by FredT
The Army's experience in SOmalia and GWII showed they were really vulnerable to small arms fire. 
Those are open terrain countries, even aircrafst at low altitudes are vulnerable to fire from assault rifles in those areas.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 12:24 PM by Murcielago
|
I believe it's main reason for being kicked to the curb it the Unmanned A-160 Hummingbird.
external image
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 12:29 PM by FredT
|
The stealth charecteristics would have alloed it no protection from that. I do agree that small cheaper unmanned drones would be optimal for the
mission.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2004 @ 01:06 PM by Majic
|
It was canceled in favor of superior alternatives that are already available, and you can rest assured that the technologies developed under this
program have been harvested for suitable application to other programs, including a lot of very nifty software.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2006 @ 04:03 PM by QuantumLeap
|
It's really a shame they cancelled that helicopter. It was a wonder of modern technology.
And for those of you wondering if it would be useful....well hardly an helicopter would be brought down by an AK unless something is very wrong with
its maintenance. An Apache can withstands hits of bullets up to 12.7mm, 23mm in the most important and sensitive areas. The comanche has similar
levels of endurance and if the problem was indeed maintenance that would be much less of an issue with comanches's improved modular electronics and
remove-and-replace system.
Besides, most of the choppers shot down in Iraq and Afghanistan were hit by heat seeking rockets. Comanche radiates only 25% as much heat as an Apache
and relies on a IR supressor that cools down gases coming from the exhausts to such an extent that a heat seeking missile can't lock on to it. Hardly
any of those rockets use radar to reach their targets but if that were the case they wouldn't be too efficient against an helicopter with a radar
signature smaller than a hellfire missile. Even if it were sound....a comanche makes about 50% less noise than an Apache.
Add to that an incredible manouverability and speed, an impressive array of sensors, ability to operate day and night, in bad weather and harsh desert
conditions, and the capacity to quickly collect, analyze and disseminate
huge amounts of info and you'll agree that it would be the best possible (manned) replacement for an Apache in its current role in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
Now if UCAV's are the reason....well make a cockpit-less comanche, either operating independently or with remote control.
DON'T JUST USE THAT TECH ON OLDER CHOPPERS!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2006 @ 05:06 PM by D4rk Kn1ght
|
No, the comanche was designed to let bullets pass through it - it had no armour at all on it bar the glass and seats..
So it could easily be brought down by 5.56 mm weapons let alone any of the bigger stuff.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-12-2006 @ 09:54 PM by semperfoo
|
Man to bad they cancled this. Anyway another country could get their hands on this?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2006 @ 11:24 AM by crusader97
|
Originally posted by D4rk Kn1ght
No, the comanche was designed to let bullets pass through it - it had no armour at all on it bar the glass and seats..
So it could easily be brought down by 5.56 mm weapons let alone any of the bigger stuff. 
No - it may not have had armor in the more traditional sense, but it would take more than 5.56 rounds to bring it down. I actually saw several of the
prototypes in mid-construction during the 90's, and it's a pretty survivable system.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2006 @ 01:22 PM by Ghost01
|
Originally posted by D4rk Kn1ght
So it could easily be brought down by 5.56 mm weapons let alone any of the bigger stuff. 
A NATO 5.56mm is an M-16 round! You are claiming the RAH-66 was design to be penatrated by a standard M-16 bullet? Sorry, but check your facts. I've
never heard of a combat helicopter being that fragile.
Many of our enemies use the larger, more powerful 7.62mm cartage of the AK-47. The Notion of a combat helicopter being that easy to shoot down is
Rediulas!
Tim
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2006 @ 03:17 PM by Lonestar24
|
Originally posted by semperfoo
Man to bad they cancled this. Anyway another country could get their hands on this? 
Why would anyone want that overpriced, over weight and underperforming cold war monstrosity? It has no advantages in the combat role over existing
designs, and there are A LOT more readily available and cheaper systems for the recce task.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-12-2006 @ 09:27 AM by Figher Master FIN
|
Originally posted by semperfoo
Man to bad they cancled this. Anyway another country could get their hands on this? 
Why would USA give the best experimental stealth chopper (ever) to an other country  . Obviously they could give it to their allies such as Japan
or England. But what would they do with it if USA doesn't do anything with it? The RAH-66 was cancelled because UAV and UCAV took over. Why did they
take over? Because they are much cheaper to maintain than an expensive stealth chopper.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-12-2006 @ 06:31 PM by crusader97
|
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
The RAH-66 was cancelled because UAV and UCAV took over. Why did they take over? Because they are much cheaper to maintain than an expensive stealth
chopper. 
Nope - that's not really it at all. Flight software development was way behind schedule, amongst other internal problems in the program. The UAV's
and UCAV's have not taken over, if they had, there would not be a requirement for the ARH-70.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |