2 UFO photos daytime

Exif for first:

[Image]
Make = Hewlett-Packard
Model = HP Photosmart E330
X Resolution = 102
Y Resolution = 108
Resolution Unit = inch
Software = Version 1.5100
Date Time = 2008-02-09 17:25:45
YCbCr Positioning = co-sited
Reference Black White = [0/1, 255/1, 128/1, 255/1, 128/1, 255/1]
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 390
GPS Info IFD Pointer = Offset: 776
A402 = 0
A403 = 0
A404 = 0/10
A406 = 0
A408 = 0
A409 = 0
A40A = 0
A40C = 0
A420 = d401B0064005E0F5197D820900000000

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/60"
F Number = F4.5
Exposure Program = Normal program
ISO Speed Ratings = 200
Exif Version = Version 2.2
Date Time Original = 2008-02-09 17:25:45
Date Time Digitized = 2008-02-09 17:25:45
Components Configuration = YCbcr
Shutter Speed Value = 5.9 TV
Aperture Value = 4.33 AV
Brightness Value = 4.24 BV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F4.48
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Light Source = Shade
Flash = Flash fired, auto mode
Focal Length = 6mm
Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 2576
Exif Image Height = 1920
Sensing Method = One-chip color area sensor
File Source = DSC

Exif for second:

[Image]
Make = Hewlett-Packard
Model = HP Photosmart E330
X Resolution = 102
Y Resolution = 108
Resolution Unit = inch
Software = Version 1.5100
YCbCr Positioning = co-sited
Reference Black White = [0/1, 255/1, 128/1, 255/1, 128/1, 255/1]
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 250
GPS Info IFD Pointer = Offset: 860

[Camera]
0132 = 2008:03:09 00:00:51
Exposure Time = 1/2000"
F Number = F4.5
Exposure Program = Normal program
ISO Speed Ratings = 60
Exif Version = Version 2.2
Date Time Original = 2008-03-09 00:00:51
Date Time Digitized = 2008-03-09 00:00:51
Components Configuration = YCbcr
Shutter Speed Value = 10.96 TV
Aperture Value = 4.33 AV
Brightness Value = 11.04 BV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F4.48
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Light Source = Daylight
Flash = Flash did not fire, auto mode
Focal Length = 6mm
Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 2576
Exif Image Height = 1920
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 788
Sensing Method = One-chip color area sensor
File Source = DSC
Exposure Mode = Auto exposure
White Balance = Auto white balance
Digital Zoom Ratio =
Scene Capture Type = Normal
Contrast = Normal
Saturation = Normal
Sharpness = Normal
Subject Distance Range = unknown
Image Unique ID = d401B0064034A000337D830900000000

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Index = ExifR98
Interoperability Version = Version 1.0

[edit on August 25th 2010 by greeneyedleo]

The fact that you saw nothing with the naked eye proves that there was nothing of any size or significance up in the clouds. Trust your own observations before you trust the results of a digital camera!

The first photo looks like an insect caught in the flash as Phage has said. There are even a couple of dust particles visible (or ET Orbs, as Greer and Gilliland would call them).

Second pic looks like a lens flare to me.

David Sereda or Jose Escamilla might buy the photos from you! Don't let them have them for less than $500, though!

Photo sensitivity beyond the normal vision has to be the reason.
Just don't take photos with any sky in them or UFOs, er Tesla craft,
show up.

Nice find as these add to the many photos of fliers thus found
through the years.

Although I can't read him due to the lovely ignore button under his avatar TeslandTyne showing up means that you are heading into a world of absolute nonsense by way of thread conclusion if science is your basis of belief/knowing the best we can.

Just a tip!

-m0r

So lets recap A few are saying VENUS, space shuttel Insects sun glare or wait for it the sun its self why not Mars saturn or jupiter why does it allways have to be venus DRIP.
All speculation of course no evidence to back any of your claims thats about right.
I can go with the incect thing Mabe a Big Moth but what does that say about the venus thing that most are saying venus is normaly white like any other star.
For the other object sun glare no I dont think so show me Sun glare like that go on google and try and find sun glare like that. some people just blurt out anything when there no answer for what there looking at or just follow along with the other people.
that goes for you to phage sun glare mabe. get real.



[edit on 24/09/2008 by ufosbri]

Originally posted by ufosbri
So lets recap A few are saying VENUS, space shuttel Insects sun glare or wait for it the sun its self why not Mars saturn or jupiter why does it allways have to be venus DRIP.
All speculation of course no evedence to back any of your claims thats about right.

So what do you think its is? Or are you just speculating?

I can go with the incect thing Mabe a Big Moth but what does that say about the venus thing that most are saying venus is normaly white like any other star.

People are looking for logical explanations first instead of point at your photo and screaming " its Darth Vader in an X-wing".

For the other object sun glare no I dont think so show me Sun glare like that go on google and try and find sun glare like that. some people just blurt out anything when there no answer for what there looking at or just follow along with the other people.
that goes for you to phage sun glare mabe. get real.

I suggest you grab a fork, a napkin and get ready to chew on some humble pie with a challenge like that.
Bon appetit.

reply to post by ufosbri


Ufosbri.....

Thank you for posting your interesting photos.

Here are my thoughts for your consideration.

Photo 1:

The object is a bug or some other small object close to the camera that has been illuminated by the flash (as per the EXIF data).

Photo 2:

The object is definitely dust or some other small object close to the camera. The appearance is typical of that, as shown hundreds of times previously on ATS.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


[edit on 26-8-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

reply to post by atlasastro


The second object I think UFO as the object is moveing when I had taken the photo It looks like a contrail to the bottom left as its moveing towards the sun Apart from that you really only get sun glare when you can see the sun, or when the suns out at the side of you when you take the photo I dont see any sun glare in that photo There is a couple of sun lines.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


The second object is in the clouds mate that rules out dust or something on the lenze. you can see its really high up in the sky. cheers anyway mabe mabe not

Originally posted by ufosbri
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

 

The second object is in the clouds mate that rules out dust or something on the lenze. you can see its really high up in the sky. cheers anyway mabe mabe not

Ufosbri.....

Regarding the object in the 2nd photo:

The object's appearance is completely typical of dust or similar being photographed very close to & therefore out of the focal range of the camera.

It is not "in the clouds.....really high up in the sky".

Here is another example of dust:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f6c25fe8b4d9.jpg[/atsimg]

"Cheers anyway"
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 26-8-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


Its not dust dude my camera is allways clean the object is in the clouds are you just going to speculate or show me some evedence if it was close to the camera the object would be out of focus. Its a clear photo dude. No dust.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


Its durring the day mate Im sorry but that looks close to the camera you only get these things if you use the flash on the camera which picks up dust and highlights them so no you picture is nothing like it TRY again.

You need the flash on the camera to get these orb things.

LOOK AT The details of the photo the flash did not FIRE.

[edit on 24/09/2008 by ufosbri]

reply to post by ufosbri


Mate, there are signs of dust in your first photo too:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/84eaa0e328ac.png[/atsimg]

Or are all these UFO orbs too?

reply to post by ufosbri


Ufosbri.....

You are right.

It is not dust.

It is an alien space ship.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by Chadwickus


Like I sayed you only get this effect if you use the FLASH.

In this photo the flash was not USED Look at the details God dam it.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


So your been shot down then. your stumped just admit it dude. next

[edit on 24/09/2008 by ufosbri]

Originally posted by ufosbri
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not

 

So your been shot down then. your stumped just admit it dude.

Ufosbri.....

That's right.

Despite the fact it looks exactly like dust, I guess it can't be dust because you state that it isn't.

Therefore it must be an alien space ship.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by ufosbri


Indeed that is correct, I was merely pointing out that despite you having a clean camera, dust can still enter the field of view.

Which is why the second image is lens flare.

reply to post by Chadwickus


Chadwickus.....

So you say "lens flare".....not "dust"?

I think I still lean heavily towards "dust".

Errmm.....

Except of course, if it's an alien space ship.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by Chadwickus


Then show me sum pics of dust in phots durring the day with no flash so you changed your mind its sun glare now. your not doing youself any favors mate