Originally posted by cupocoffee
No, I would not say that "anyone" or "everyone" "knows" that. Please speak for yourself only.
You jumped the shark when you injected the
"water buggy man".
Anyone that knows this topic, would know you jumped the shark.
Many people say
Please speak for yourself.
that his technology did work and he was very close to cutting a deal, then he died very suddenly outside a restaurant one day. Well, gee, that
seems kind of suspicious to me!
What seems suspicious to me is that you will go on hearsay, and the desperate correlation of his death with
his activities rather than any real evidence. That is suspicious.
Did you hear about the many people who he defrauded and was prosecuted for?
Did you hear that.
I mean, surely Meyer should have just shown his water buggy working and wham! Not guilty.
Once again, Meyer left his patents and plenty of diagrams, so get to it Cupocoffee, put up or shut up.
And I notice you didn't say anything about Mallove. He was brutally murdered, that is a well known fact.
Once agin, you seem to
correlate the manner of his death with some kind of link to his work.
Why would I need to mention Mallove, he published a free energy magazine, big f!@#$%^ deal.
It is also a well known fact that he was brutally beaten to death by two people who were apprehended for his murder.
Mallove is interesting though considering Fleischmann and Pons announced the possibility of cold fusion in the late 80's, Mallove seemed rather
ineffectual in 15 years in shedding any light on this "new" energy, Many Schools( Stanford, Caltech, Young U, just to name a few) were able to
perform the experiment that Fleishmann and Pons performed but did not observe any useful energy as a by product of the method.
Scientists all over Western Europe also failed to replicate the claims made of cold fusion, including Cern.
I guess ALL these scientists must be linked to Mallove's murder.
If this energy was viable, why were Pons and Fleischmann not killed?
What is sicken though, about Mallove, is that Hoagland used a mass email Mallove sent to hundreds of collegues months before his death. Hoagland
claimed that Mallove had mailed it to him just hours before his death, he posted it on Enterprise.
Hoagland is scum.
As far as I'm concerned there are several groups that have already "put up".
Blacklight Power are already licensing out their technology and have already had at least six commercial deals now.
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzz. Were is
the free energy mate.
Were is it.
Mills claims he has Unified the Field of Classical Physics.
That is a big call.
But any way, BLP got 70 mill from investors. So, again, were is the free energy mate. BLP are on the back of the boom in the new and alternative
energy sector, but Mills and Co. have been banging on about their "technology" since '91.
They will be charging dude, anyway, and this won't be something you will plug in at home and it has its limitations as well as massive costs.
John Bedini has released patents, schematics, books, videos, open-source kits, everything. His latest 10-coil kit comes with all the parts,
schematic diagrams, instructions, everything.
Again, I will ask, build one, put up or shut up.
Now if you choose not to believe in it, if you choose to believe that they are hoaxers or scammers or whatever, well that is your choice,
What am I not believing in? You have nothing to show.
You claim Bedini has it all, build one dude, its that simple.
Blacklight are an ENERGY COMPANY commercializing a NEW and ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.
Point out where I say in my posts that commercialized alternative energy applications do not exist. I actually brought up a solar energy example a few
Just point it out. Put up or shut up.
We are all entitled to our own opinion, aren't we?
What a stupid question to ask as you assert it.
If you guys don't believe yet, it's not my job to convince you.
It seems that you don't even know what you are talking about.
You have constantly babbled on about FREE ENERGY.
post by cupocoffee
Bearden and Bedini also happen to be connected to Greer, and they are selling free energy devices now. We're all about seeking truth
and denying ignorance here, so shouldn't we test out these devices?
Put up or shut up dude, its that simple.
post by cupocoffee
Same thing with the Bedini motors and energizers. I respect people who do the field work and try building the thing and see if it works.
I don't respect people who jump to the conclusion that it's a fraud without doing any field work.
Do the field work mate!
Put up or shut up.
The best you can do is link a Company(Blacklight), which has multiple investors, that is selling its technology in new regenerative energy production.
It is NOT producing this energy yet.
Just a tip dude, that is not free energy disclosure, that is capitalism.
It has agreements
about licensing it technology but it still
has to build its "reactors" with UTILITY and other companies.
On the surface, this seems like a massive breakthrough as apparently this technology, when built, can power up to 1 million homes.
Time will tell.
Cranbury, NJ (March 23, 2010)—BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced its seventh commercial license agreement, and first in Europe with
GEOENERGIE SpA, Energy Subsidiary of Geogreen. In a non-exclusive agreement, BLP has licensed GEOENERGIE SpA to use the BlackLight Process and certain
BLP energy technology for the production of thermal or electric power in Italy. GEOENERGIE SpA may produce gross thermal power up to a maximum
continuous capacity of 750 MW or convert this thermal power to corresponding electricity.
There, see? I "put up" just for you, atlas. Happy now?
You have shown me a press release.
Thanks dude, awesome!
BTW 750MW is what Canada just announced it will get from its new wind farm.
14 September 2010-- Canada is projected to install 754 MW of new wind energy capacity by the end of 2010, representing $1.7 billion (US$1.66
billion) in new investment, the Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) said during the World Energy Congress 2010 in Montreal. This will bring
Canada’s total installed wind energy capacity to 4,073 MW.
This wind farm will be built by the end of this year.
Lets see what it will costs to build Blacklight.
One comprises a multi-tube thermally interacting bundle of cells wherein cells producing power provide heat to those undergoing regeneration. As
a system, the power output is constant. The capital costs are projected to be about $1400/kW electric. The other comprises an array of
reactors wherein power and regeneration chemistries occur synchronously, and each cell outputs constant power. The capital costs are projected to
be about $1050/kW electric. A third design called CIHT utilizes many options of tested chemistry and comprises the direct production of
electrical power from the formation of hydrinos. The capital costs are projected to be about $25/kW electric with no infrastructure
requirements, and the system is deployable for essentially any application at any scale.
If we go by the agreement you linked to 750mW.
A Megawatt hour equals ten to the power of 6, times this by 750. Which gives us 7,500,000,000, which we divide by 1000 for kilowatt costs as per
7,500,000 by $1400/kW.
So, capital costs of $10,500,000,000 in capital costs for that application in order to generate 750mW.
Plus, we have to factor in a royalty that Blacklight tack onto the license agreement.
• BlackLight is non-exclusively licensing its process to make power for a fixed royalty payment per kilowatt-hour of thermal or electric.
In Australia, we built some wind farms with an output of 70mW for $130,000,000.
This powers only about 36,000 homes.
750mW/70mW times $130,000,000 will give us the equivalent costs in producing 750mW of wind energy.
$1,392,857,141. With no royalties.
Sounds cheaper then:
$10,500,000,000. with on going, unspecified, royalties per kW. That would be 7,500,000kW by what ever the royalty is as stated by Blacklight, that
they have put in all their agreements.
When do Blacklight expect to have a working utility?
• The hydrogen fuel for the BlackLight Process could be obtained by diverting a fraction of the output energy of the process to power the
electrolysis of water into its elemental constituents, hydrogen and oxygen gases. With water as the fuel, the operational cost of BlackLight
Power generators is likely to be very inexpensive. Moreover, the process does not give rise to pollution, green-house gases, or radiation as
conventional systems do.
It either does, will, or it can.
Likely to be inexpensive? Thats not what the rest of their summary tells us.
Sure, it would be nice if ATS were to do its own free energy project, to help bring some much-needed publicity to a very important
Dude, all you have done is advertise con men.
Start another thread.
Besides, suppose I do go build one of these 10-coil units and make a video, like this "MachineOfTime1" guy did. I can already hear the
debunkers going, "Hoax! That's not proof of anything. There are hidden batteries in the system somewhere. You're not measuring things right. It's
impossible! Conservation of energy! Laws of thermodynamics!" etc etc etc.
Put up or shut up.
I guarantee you no one will ever "prove" Free Energy to the complete satisfaction of everyone on here. Especially when this site is teeming
with professional debunkers......
Dude, you can't even show one "free energy" system. Not one!
Blacklight have not come through yet! They are a venture in progress, a capitalist venture with multiple investors who have agreements with utilities
and private companies.
That means, even as an energy source, it will not be free, nor will it be something you will build from watching a youtube video.
As far as Blacklight goes, it would be like me starting a "free energy thread" and posting links to a company selling Solar Panels.
Interesting Link to Blacklight all the same.
Time will tell.