It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
TOTAL LIES (as I have, on multiple occasions, taken great pains to point out...)
edit on 15 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Yes, indeed.....it WAS NOT!!! I thought I had made that clear....again, WORDS do not describe, adequately, what can be EXPERIENCED and FELT.....this limitation of "words" is the bane of trying to describe, to non-pilots....
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
Yes, indeed.....it WAS NOT!!! I thought I had made that clear....again, WORDS do not describe, adequately, what can be EXPERIENCED and FELT.....this limitation of "words" is the bane of trying to describe, to non-pilots....
So why don't you try debating with REAL PILOTS instead of complaining about it???
I checked the link to p4t, they have chat..They seem civil from the little I read..
So go and beat them down with facts Weedwhacker..
Much better than debating with me and others then complaining we don't know enough...
I'd be interested to see the outcome.....
You said you had vids of low level, high speed passenger jets..
Are you going to show them??
I have honestly searched and found none other than fighter jets..
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Real pilots.
A man pretending to be a porn star and a load of socks.
Yeah, I'd definitely want to be on their team. They have so much credibility.
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Real pilots.
A man pretending to be a porn star and a load of socks.
Yeah, I'd definitely want to be on their team. They have so much credibility.
Great post..I like the way you debate with links and provable facts..
Thanks for that insightful post.
No worries. I can prove my assertions if you like, although a moment's googling will show you that "Tiffany" isn't really the person you think she is.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by AntiSophist
Ahhh...I see, per the hidden link (very clever??) you are YET ANOTHER ROB BALSOAMO sock.....
....will address your post in a bit.....AFTER alerting staff....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
ONCE THEY MET THAT AIRSPEED, they (he, the man fling) too k steps to reduce speed....by REDUCING THURST, levelling off to maintain a specific altitude....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
"Aerodynamic force is directly related to the air density flowing past the body."
Originally posted by lachstockn2
And TrickoftheShade - you need to grow up.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by lachstockn2
And TrickoftheShade - you need to grow up.
Why?
This is a conspiracy theory website. Click a few threads at random and you'll see that infantilism is pretty much the order if the day.
And anyway, I don't see what's particularly juvenile about pointing out the pathetic attempts of P4T's spokesman to spam this site. You must admit that it hardly enhances their credibility. Indeed you could say they're the ones who need to grow up.
....Balsamo - assuming it's him - sounds like a broken record when he posts and re-posts the same V-G Diagrams, cites the same real-life precedents and refers to the same aerodynamic principals. If any of these anomalies had been shown to be innocuous, irrelevant or wrong, then sure ...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
...and, that diagram was only altered AFTER it was pointed out to him of that Type Certification Supplemental information, from Boeing. Prior, he had drawn the V-G diagram with the speed of Vmo (360 knbots) at the far right speed "limit").
Also, here is a visual depiction based on data.
The above is for a 767, reduce the speeds by 10 knots for a 757.
Some have made the claim the above diagram is "fake". Those who make such a claim clearly aren't aware that a Vg can be plotted when the V-speeds are known.
They claim the above diagram is "fake" because it doesn't provide a weight or altitude range, nor G-load range. Actually, it does.
Again they demonstrate their lack of research ability and lack of aeronautical knowledge.
The speeds are based on the weight ranges in the A1NM Type Certificate data sheet which also give an altitude range.
VD = 420 KCAS to 17,854 ft/.91M above 23,000 ft, linear variation between these points.
The above diagram is good from sea level, up to almost 18,000 feet. Above that, the Vg diagram actually moves to the left. In other words, structural failure speeds are less in terms of Indicated at higher altitudes. Real pilots can see this as they climb. The Vmo indicator (Barber pole) actually moves to a lower airspeed once you climb above the crossover altitude. The reason for this is the aircraft is no longer limited by raw dynamic pressure, rather it is now becoming limited by the effects of Mach (both drag related, which is why EAS is calculated using Mach number and good to above Mach 2). A good explanation of this is shown here.
Vmo/Mmo
The G-Loads are based on FAA Regulation, as is every Vg diagram, except military.
For those who wish to learn more regarding Vg diagrams and the effects of weight/altitude, click here...
www.apstraining.com...
If you come across someone who thinks our diagrams are "fake", feel free to give them the above video course, or tell them to call their local flight school.
The above speeds as set by the manufacturer based on wind tunnel and flight testing are also confirmed based on precedent, using Egypt Air 990 which suffered in flight structural failure 5 knots above Vd (Vd defines the structural failure line for every Vg envelope). See "9/11: World Trade Center Attack" for in depth analysis.