It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by lachstockn2
Wind tunnel testing is what I had in mind.
Anyone got access to one of those?
Interesting concept but wind tunnels are only air..
There are other forces at work such as G forces in the turns etc..
I don't think I have to re-post video examples, from airshows, of large commercial airplanes performing at LOW ALTITUDES and HIGH AIRSPEEDS? Do I?? (You can find them for yourself....)
I'm not sure how to demonstrate that the G-forces and loading were not excessive under normal conditions.....
What "g-force" do you think an airplane experieces in level, unaccelerated flight? If ou guesse "ONE G" then you would be correct.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
...The "scenario"?...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
"KEAS" was raised by those at the "PilotsFor9/11Truth" site, as yet another red herring distraction tactic.
"Equivalent Airspeed" is NOT something normally taught to pilots...I HAD TO LOOK IT UP (As did, I imagine, the bozos at "P4T") and what I found is it is an engineering term, specific to certain design aspects....IN MOST CASES, though....KEAS is just about the same as KCAS (a term I AM familiar with).
And, no...the "density" of the air near sea level is just more flatulence being spewed in your (the audience's) direction, by those sorts of websites......
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
....I don't think I have to re-post video examples, from airshows, of large commercial airplanes performing at LOW ALTITUDES and HIGH AIRSPEEDS? Do I?? (You can find them for yourself....)....
edit on 14 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
What "g-force" do you think an airplane experiences in level, unaccelerated flight? If you guess "ONE G" then you would be correct.
edit on 14 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
OF COURSE the people onboard UAL 175 experienced G forces.....they were at the mercy of people who were flying the airplane in a manner that was NOT how professionals fly. WE CAN ALSO, if we choose, manipulate the controls in a manner to exert G forces on the passengers....BUT, that is not how professional pilots fly the airplanes.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
You posted a link to a RADES chart for United 175 (even if misidentifed as a "Boeing 757").....and your point???
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
I fail to understand how MY comments about G forces were misinterpreted to that extent.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by lachstockn2
HAVE YOU EVER FLOWN AN AIRPLANE? Simple question. Yes or no.
If the answer is "No" then...well.....you do not (yet) have much experience with which to bring to this discussion.....
HAVE YOU EVER FLOWN AN AIRPLANE? Simple question. Yes or no.
If the answer is "No" then...well.....you do not (yet) have much experience with which to bring to this discussion.....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
What is MOST CRITICAL on the airframe is the Mach number....especially nearing critical Mach, when airflow patterns on areas of the airframe can be HIGHER than the overall airplane speed.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
"Equivalent Airspeed" is NOT something normally taught to pilots...I HAD TO LOOK IT UP
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack
Trying to explain....to someone who might have NOT ever experienced G forces in an airplane? I have no means to describe it for you, sorry.
YOU have to "feel" it.....AND, I will then see the look on your face......
...only OTHER example I can possibly hope you relate to is turbulence, for those instances that you've experienced...on a commercial flight.
Anyway, the POINT is that UAL 175 was NOT in continuous level, unaccelerated flight.
This means that not only did the passengers and pilots experience additional Gs, but so did the plane.
Which is why your assertion that G-forces are irrelevant to this discussion is almost as funny as it is wrong.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The "PilotsFor9/11Truth" would lie to you, and tell you many stories...
THAT is what occurred on 9/11 On UAL 175, AAL 11 and AAL 77.
IT is SO Basic, to a pilot.....it is difficult to describe to you laypeople......
I don't think I have to re-post video examples, from airshows, of large commercial airplanes performing at LOW ALTITUDES and HIGH AIRSPEEDS? Do I?? (You can find them for yourself....)....
Precedent -
EA990
China Air 747SP
TWA 727
737
Modified DC-8
All suffered in flight structural failure, crash and/or lost control and needed 10's of thousand of feet to recover, well below Vmo+150.... or was modified to exceed it's manufacturer's set limits in the case of the DC-8.