It's really sad how some people here refuse to deal in facts., page 10


Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times


reply posted on 18-7-2010 @ 02:11 PM by Cobra.EXE
Originally posted by SaosinEngaged
With a disaster as horrible is this, it greatly irritates me how hyperbolic many posters have become.

Thinking everything is a lie, everything is a cover up, the world is ending in a methane explosion of fiery doom and pain, an earthquake that's going to crack the earth in two and pop open like an easter egg...

Enough already.

Stop letting wild speculation get the best of you. Deal with the facts. Don't let the opinion of some random "expert" take hold of you and allow you to propogate that opinion as fact. It's really sad the extent to which that happens here on this board.

Like the topic on the main page about BP "obviously" covering up another leak. Everyone's acting like that's some sort of fact, when the reality is it's nothing more than wild speculation. Treat it as such.

Remember, deny ignorance. It works both ways. Just because we're wise to conspiracy theories doesn't mean we turn EVERYTHING into some massive doomsday conspiracy.

It angers me, because even after the well has capped, it almost seems like some of you WANT this catastrophe to continue so you can propogate more of this world ending doomsday nonsense. It's really aggrivating.

The spill is bad enough, we don't need layers of hyperbole added on top of it. I can respect everyone's opinion, but only if it isn't propogated as fact.

Just because you heard XXXX from YYYY doesn't mean XXXX is going to happen or that YYYYY is even as credible a source as you seem to believe.





what makes you think the possibility isnt there regarding a methane worst case scenario?

so youre saying BP has been completely truthful regarding its evil acts towards our planet? are you admitting youre oblivious to their lies?

i hear your argument as valid, but why would you give them the benefit of the doubt regarding this being part of a bigger more dangerous picture?

edit to add this other thread, dont want to deny facts now do we?

www.abovetopsecret.com...&flagit=594674

[edit on 18-7-2010 by Cobra.EXE]


reply posted on 18-7-2010 @ 02:35 PM by Sly1one
Originally posted by SaosinEngaged
With a disaster as horrible is this, it greatly irritates me how hyperbolic many posters have become.

Thinking everything is a lie, everything is a cover up, the world is ending in a methane explosion of fiery doom and pain, an earthquake that's going to crack the earth in two and pop open like an easter egg...

Enough already.

Stop letting wild speculation get the best of you. Deal with the facts. Don't let the opinion of some random "expert" take hold of you and allow you to propogate that opinion as fact. It's really sad the extent to which that happens here on this board.

Like the topic on the main page about BP "obviously" covering up another leak. Everyone's acting like that's some sort of fact, when the reality is it's nothing more than wild speculation. Treat it as such.

Remember, deny ignorance. It works both ways. Just because we're wise to conspiracy theories doesn't mean we turn EVERYTHING into some massive doomsday conspiracy.

It angers me, because even after the well has capped, it almost seems like some of you WANT this catastrophe to continue so you can propogate more of this world ending doomsday nonsense. It's really aggrivating.

The spill is bad enough, we don't need layers of hyperbole added on top of it. I can respect everyone's opinion, but only if it isn't propogated as fact.

Just because you heard XXXX from YYYY doesn't mean XXXX is going to happen or that YYYYY is even as credible a source as you seem to believe.



I agree and disagree. I've seen here that yes some are quick to the conspiratorial/doomsday trigger. This is the nature of the beast so to speak you are on a conspiratorial forum.

Having said that, you do have to also acknowledge that "FACTS" are subjective and most "FACTS" are actually just strong evidence. A fact is something that cannot be refuted PERIOD.

Not to mention that some "facts" are fabricated and perpetuated by those with enough influence to make you belive those "facts" ie: Scientists at universities whos "research" is funded by "special interests". That is a conflict of interest that perpetuates falsehoods and lies of the most influential kind.

As far as teh BP catastrophe goes there is ALOT of evidence that BP are Liars so their witness testimony will always be screutinzed and rightfully so. So when BP says "hurray well capped!" the reaction should be skepticism. Just as when BP says "no way to tell how much is leaking" or "leaking only 5000 bpd" wait no "10000 Bpd" so on and so fourth.


I will agree that there is alot of "sensationalism" though when people speculate what exactly is going on, good or bad.

I do however ask, when in a very dangerous situation do you sit and wait for facts until you act?

That man pointing a gun at your pregnant wife....hmm lets do some tests and get some witness testimony going to see if that gun is real and to see if it is indeed actually loaded. Then after that well check and see if he has a history of violent crimes to see if he really means it.

I know what I would do and it would be based on A LOT of assumption but hell better assuming the worst then assuming the best in this case.

Honestly I think a lot of people here are just theorizing and speculating because they question the facts their given which seems to be the natural thing to do when you question anything your told, you start figuring out your own answer.






[edit on 18-7-2010 by Sly1one]

[edit on 18-7-2010 by Sly1one]


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 12:05 PM by icecold7
reply to post by Whine Flu



it aint abot gred its an attack
do u know which rights u still have?
let me tell u
NONE
well,U have the right to be killed and extracted for resources
ill give u that


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 12:12 PM by lardo5150
reply to post by crezo



I completely agree.

Now listen, throwing out ideas of methan explosions or Godzilla coming out of this well is all fine and dandy. These are "possibilities". These types of things should be debated if they can happen based on facts, not just opinions.

Remember deny ignorance.

With regards to the BP spill, I have seen some very interesting facts and debates, but I have also seen some threads and posts ranging from fear mongering to the completely insane.


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 12:27 PM by lasertaglover
Both sides of this argument have a valid point. There are some outlandish claims being made here on ATS.

However, just two weeks ago if anyone said that the sea floor was leaking, they were branded as heretics, and doom and gloomers. The response commander, Thad Allen, talked about the sea floor leaking as recently as yesterday.

And, the same people were branded as heretics when they said that the flow rate was dramtically bigger than 5,000 barrels per day in the beginning. Until this was capped, we were at 35,000-60,000.

My point is that yes, an undersea explosion or end-of-the-world case might not have too much scientific proof and IMO, will not happen, but it seems like those people on here that like to make fun of and ridicule the so-called 'doom and gloomers' never stop to say, "Oh yeah, you all were right to say and post before the MSM that the leak was 10X bigger than BP said, or that there are indeed leaks in the sea floor, or that COREXIT is stunningly dangerous stuff, or the tons of different threads here on ATS that have been proven correct."

Hysteria does indeed suck, and it does lead to panic, which is a horrible emotional state to be in that clouds judgment.

But it would be great for the 'everything is ok and gosh darn it, BP is trying their best, and please stop scaring me' people to stop making fun of the other people.

A spirited debate about controversy and conspiracy is at the core of ATS.

Both sides of the argument do have some valid points, but a higher level of civility from both sides would be very nice indeed.


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 10:14 PM by silo13
reply to post by silo13


And if you're pretending we're being told the truth?
Then I've got one of those peaches to sell you.

BP's altered photo distorts spill center activity



BP acknowledges it posted on its website an altered photo that exaggerates the activity at its Gulf oil spill command center in Houston.

The picture posted over the weekend showed workers monitoring a bank of 10 giant video screens displaying underwater images.
link

How many lies is this now from BP

But hey, it's a shame people refuse to deal in facts right?

WHAT FACTS!

peac



reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 10:26 PM by justadood
reply to post by mydarkpassenger



I dont think the OP, or really anyone is saying they dont like 'out there theories' as much as they are saying they tire of seeing people confuse speculation as fact.

i think the endless stream of threads predicting all kinds of nonsense are evidence enough that many people here dont understand how to use the language properly.

As if waiting to do a just a little more research before you post would somehow be a BAD thing.

Peer-review means people aggressively shooting holes in a theory. Can oyu imagine if a scientist published a theory, called it fact, and then called anyone of his peers 'shills' for doing their job by picking the theory apart?

aggressive critique helps us ALL get closer to something resembling truth.
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Oil and Tar Balls Litter the Gulf Coast After Hurricane Isaac
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
Did BP delay sealing the well so they could use it later?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Beach report - St. George Island, FL
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
Mass die offs still occurring?
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Yangtze river turns into tomato juice in China ( picture inside)
  Posted 4 days ago with 1 member flags