It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DEEZNUTZ
reply to post by justadood
Are you sure? That one in the pic looks like it's brand new. It may be similar to the one that they pulled from DH but I don't think that one in the picture is the one from the DH. Looks to new the other one was all rusty and beat up. You could tell that from the feeds.
Originally posted by kno22
reply to post by Nogard2012
I'm not sure what you are telling us here? The damaged BOP was brought up, taken into custody by the FBI waiting on the ship, & taken to NASA according to the published, & known, report. I questioned the reason for using NASA immediately. It's all a few pages back in this thread. The reason given is NASA has the space to store & investigate the damage & does have a facility in Louisiana.
I'm not at all convinced that is the only reason for using NASA, but have no way to investigate the possibility other reasons. I do know this. The BOP is out of sight. No pesky reporters or concerned citizens looking over a shoulder. Only people bound by confidentially clauses in their contracts have access.
At the risk of sounding paranoid, at this point, I don't trust any of them.
Originally posted by kno22
reply to post by StealthyKat
Early on we saw what appeared to be fuel exploding resulting in fire under water. That doesn't explain this. I don't think tectonic plate movement explains this.
Originally posted by kno22
reply to post by StealthyKat
After my initial fight or flight impluse wore off after seeing that footage, I thought of a couple of things that might contribute to, but not fully explain, what is going on. Years ago a scientist offered the theory of methane bubbles from the sea floor that could take out ships & possibly aircraft. I hate this word but it does explain it, as a sea fart. It was suggested it might account for the disappearance around the Burmuda Triangle. The theory stood up in the models.
Richard Hoagland, ( website www.enterprisemission.com ) has said from the beginning, huge methane bubbles were building up in the Gulf. The concerns are should one make it to the surface & somehow ignite the result would be catastrophic.
I couldn't tell from the video if we were seeing the same, more or less exact, location or not. If it is the odds of that happening over & over again aren't likely. If that's the case this theory goes right out the window.
What you have shown us is terrifying. We know volcanos exist in the sea. Several land masses exist because of under water volcanos, excluding the Hawaiian islands. It takes a long time to 'grow' a land mass. My concern here is it may be a Caldera, a super volcano, such as that in Wyoming. If it is that there should be other indicators in the water, like sulpher. If BP clipped the edge of a sleeping Caldera it could go a couple of ways. Reseal itself & go back to sleep...or not.
I'm still thinking it wouldn't hurt to have a bag packed.