Originally posted by shagreen heart
reply to post by GenRadek
lol, you guys don't even try. i know you think you're being a critical thinker, but let me do that for you.
until the people are allowed an independent investigation, we can only discuss the appearance and superficial aspects of what we have seen and have
documented of the event. the case was closed before it was open.
there is more than enough dissenting physical evidence however to warrant a true investigation (abundance of thermite particles found in the debris,
molten steel at the base of the the TT for a very brief example).
the reason we still talk about this subject and look over it again and again is to maintain awareness about the preposterous coincidental anomalies of
the event, and to stimulate that discussion into a true, objective, and all reaching investigation.
or you can try to be a troll and make really weak points like you did. somethin looks like soemthin but uh oh were all experts at lookin at stuff i
guess but that don't matter cuz case clozed OS rulez keep lookin!
I think you've hit the nail on the head.
Without access to the debris from the sites, etc, then all that anyone can do is speculate, and try to analyse the minutae to death from observations,
photos, etc - which clearly will never get anyone anywhere.
Unfortunately you then get the people coming out with whacky theories (eg there were no planes they were holograms, etc), which makes the whole idea
of a conspiracy seems laughable.
I think it would be far more beneficial to take a step back and look at the general picture, the mad coincidences, and ask if they are reasonable or
For example, if you wanted to fly some planes into some buildings to justify invading other countries (or for whatever reason), then you don't need
holograms, remote controlled jumbos, or missile pods under the planes.
All that you need to do is find some people who hate the West, are prepared to die, and make it possible for them to be on the planes at the right
time, with weapons, etc.
All you'd need to do is make sure that they could take over the plane (eg, have an exercise on that day where some people hijack some planes and fly
them into buildings), make sure that there is no way to stop them (eg, make sure the fighters are all miles away), and let them go.
One thing that's always had me wondering, is that if you had an exercise where some hijacked planes are flown into buildings, then wouldn't you, as
part of that exercise, make sure that you had fighters available so that you could create any given scenario?
The whole "hijack exercise" is just too much of a coincidence to me, and how they could possibly be confused between reality and the exercise - that
suggests that they were expecting real planes to act as though they were hijacked - otherwise it would be immediately obvious.
Then for the exact same thing to happen in the London Underground bombings - an exercise where the same targets are actually bombed at the same time
on the same day that the exercise pretends it happens.
If this was storyline in a film it'd get slated for being too far fetched to be possible.
And yet here we are...