It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

David Cameron 9/11 ''Twin Towers blown up"

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 03:56 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...

a video of David Cameron
stridantly insisting that the twin towers
were "blown up"

go figure



CX

posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:03 PM
link   
Do you not think it might just be a case of taking his words out of context to suit the demolition theory?

Don't get me wrong, i think they were brought down with something other than planes too, but i don't think he means it this way.

CX.

[edit on 13/6/10 by CX]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:04 PM
link   
I think he means they were "blown up" by two passenger jets, which they were. I doubt he's going to be peddling conspiracy theories to british troops in Afghanistan.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:14 PM
link   
while youtube can be helpfull it can very often be misleading this has been taken out of context. if you look hard enoughe you can see conspiricy in anything.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:17 PM
link   
I really dont think it is a big deal

there are not a lot of words to choose to explain what happened

what would you say?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:17 PM
link   
I think it was a fruedian slip

IMHO
there is just to much proof for
and too much discredited disinfo against...

Larry Silverstien told Kevin Spacey
that building seven was "pulled"
which is the professional term for a demolition
this was aired internationaly on PBS

the investigation into the 2.3 trillion missing dollars that
Donald Rumsfeld had mentioned to the American public the day before were in building seven
which wasn't hit by anything
people died in that demolition.

also 6 out of ten 911 inestigation commissioars claim the whole invertigation was a fraud.

Every report NIST has put out has been discredited

The dancing Israelis were waiting for the first plane to hit the towers

Norm Mineta the seceratary of transport said Cheney refused to recind the Stand down imposed on the air defences

The Eye whitness who saved so many people and who testified ti explosions BEFORE the first plane hit the tower were placed
on the NO fLY LIST

"1208 architectural and engineering professionals
and 8288 other supporters including A&E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.

The petition is open to everyone."

cms.ae911truth.org...

the PATRIOT ACT DEFINES DOMSESTIC TERRORIST as all the patriots.






[edit on 13-6-2010 by Danbones]

[edit on 13-6-2010 by Danbones]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:22 PM
link   
I said it was a demo while the buildings were falling
I did "extractive demolition" for a few years



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:22 PM
link   
To me, as a non so called "expert" on 9/11 the smoking gun would be the black boxes, now never before have we not found them. there are reports from 9/11 workers that they found atleast 3, yet the FBI and 9/11 commission claims not to have them. I just refuse to believe they dont have them in their possession...or HAD them, then destroyed the evidence......



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Hulk Hogan
 


but Mohamad Attas passport survived and landed on top of the pile...

oh wait, that was a "miss spoke"

hey remember that bit about Iraqis pulling babies out of incubaters in Quwait and it turned out the witness was the daughter of a guy who owned a PR firm that was paid millions to help discredit Iraq?
oooopsie
no WMD
either





[edit on 13-6-2010 by Danbones]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:28 PM
link   
This thread isnt about what happened on 9/11 its about the interpretation of what a british prime minister said to british troops in afghanistan. David cameron is not dropping in hints about what he thinks happened on 9/11.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:31 PM
link   
Yes, they were blown up. It happened when 2 passenger planes smashed into the side of them. kaboom!

Not trying to discredit the demolition idea, but your reaching pretty hard on this one.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by woodwardjnr
 


Right...
those are examples of 'Miss spokes"
David Cameron above all in his position should have known that
expression he used whould "blow up"

"Brought down by"
has been the standard expression



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by SPACEYstranger
 



prove he didn't Mean "Blown Up"



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by woodwardjnr
 


Right...
those are examples of 'Miss spokes"
David Cameron above all in his position should have known that
expression he used whould "blow up"

"Brought down by"
has been the standard expression




I really think your wrong on this one. I would say the towers were blown up by passenger planes. Its a figure of speech.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
he says that the terrorists who " blew up" the buildings were trained in Afgahanistan
Mohamad Atta was trained at a flight school in florida.

what does my thread title say?

a video of David Cameron
stridantly insisting that the twin towers
were "blown up"

which is exactly what he said

now how would the Terrorists know the buildings would come down the way they did when no building has EVER come down from those causes ever before?

[edit on 13-6-2010 by Danbones]



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 


Exactly, Cameron is delivering the party line on how 9/11 happened. terrorists trained by bad men in caves in Afghanistan. They have to justify this war to the British public, so he's hardly going to be talking about 9/11 being an inside job.

You've read too much into his quote.

Just to add i dont know exactly what happened on 9/11. I doubt Cameron does either.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by woodwardjnr
 



I really think your wrong on this one. I would say the towers were blown up by passenger planes. Its a figure of speech.


Its really not a figure of speech.

Point being according to the Official Story the towers collapsed!

I think the government has been more than specific about this issue.

So why did he say they were blown up?



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by theability
reply to post by woodwardjnr
 



I really think your wrong on this one. I would say the towers were blown up by passenger planes. Its a figure of speech.


Its really not a figure of speech.

Point being according to the Official Story the towers collapsed!

I think the government has been more than specific about this issue.

So why did he say they were blown up?



because they were blown up, Cameron believes the planes blew them up. I cant see why people cant get this. Anyway I'll leave you to chew over his words and come up with a good conspiracy based on your interpretation of the term "Blow up"



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Yeah I think it was just a way of saying what happened. Nothing much to look into here. He is new to the job and don't think he knows how much he has to watch what he is saying these days.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 05:29 PM
link   
i am of the opinion planes hit the tower
which were primed to blow
I don't think cave dwellers caused the shut down of the air defenses
not after Norm Minetas testimony

the senior british commander in Afgahnistan recently declared the war unwinable
May be Cameron is telling the troops the truth?
sub rosa.

A pro wouldn't want to make a launguage mistake
look at the german president
that had to resign cause he said the wars were about finances

But the "people's president" had come under fire for his comments linking military action abroad with the defence of German economic interests, such as securing free trade routes.

news.bbc.co.uk...

so maybe no one has held cameron to task for his booboo yet
to much invested in him



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join