It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GrampsLEn
When one comes off as a petulant know-it-all self-righteous ass then people tune you out (not directed at you). A lot of people on these sites never read a person's post before they spout off insufferable ignoble comments that are meant to derail the thread and demean a person's character. That is inexcusable and has nothing to do with denying ignorance but has everything to do with being ignorant.
Originally posted by yuefo
reply to post by K J Gunderson
When the birth is recorded.
Originally posted by yuefo
reply to post by K J Gunderson
The health department is the entity that records births. So naturally, they "hear" it directly from the applicant. When they record a birth, they send a form to the appropriate media outlet which publishes it. I thought it was obvious. Sorry you didn't understand.
BORN IN THE USA?
Hawaiian elections official: I'd testify on Obama's birth
Clerk willing to swear in court president not born in Honolulu
Posted: June 13, 2010
5:10 pm Eastern
By Joe Kovacs
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
www.wnd.com...
The former Honolulu elections clerk who says President Obama was "definitely" not born in Hawaii and has no birth certificate from any hospital in the Aloha State says he's willing to testify in court to those facts.
"The things I've said, I don't mind testifying in court," Tim Adams, the senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in the 2008 campaign, told WND in an exclusive interview.
"I was working there, and this is what it was. I'm not a lawyer, just a civil servant. I know what I know. I know what I was told by the hospitals and by my supervisors."
"They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man's birth."
Originally posted by yuefo
reply to post by K J Gunderson
They bring the baby in with a witness, fill out forms, and the health department sends them to a hospital to get the baby checked out, etc.
Originally posted by yuefo
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Hawaii used to do that. They stopped in the '70s. You wouldn't need a witness if you'd lived there long enough to establish residency or were old enough, which Obama's mother hadn't and wasn't. And no, I'm not going to go on an internet search for you to support my points. I don't have any investment in this and present it as a theory to explain Obama's odd reluctance to release the Certificate. If you think it doesn't seem valid for whatever reason, I'm perfectly ok with it.
Originally posted by yuefo
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Hardly. My ex-girlfriend years ago worked in the department of health in California.
One day she told me about the cute baby that a couple brought in. I asked why they were there, and then we had a discussion about what happens with a home birth. A parent either goes to the health department and gets sent to the hospital, or goes to the hospital and gets sent to the health department.
Although states may differ, it's logical that the same types of connections between the health department and a hospital would exist anywhere. You're really disagreeable and angry. I'm done with you.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by K J Gunderson
why?? why do the insist on making it harder for themselves?? Can you imagine if this was true? That the entire Hawaiian government, parts of the US government, the Hawaiian health department and the parents were ALL in this cover up for the last what? 47 years? They would rather go for this theory than just simply admitting the president won the election fair and square? Don't let me start with the theory as to how 7 month pregnant teen Dunham managed to catch a 7 day $20,000 flight to Kenya in the 60's.
Unbelievable.
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by anon72
No Hospital CAN show a certificate. Not without a court order. Otherwise it would be a violation of HIPPA. And I guarantee the hammer would FALL for the hospital that did that. Regardless of whether Obama thought it was OK to release that info.
That's why I am curious how people can claim this information, since it is protected by law.
What is HIPAA?
“HIPAA” is the acronym for the federal legislation titled Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
HIPAA was designed to protect patients from disclosure of protected health information (PHI) that is oral, written, or electronic. Patients must be informed of their rights with their PHI, authorize release of information, have the right to see and amend their medical record, and be informed of what is released. HIPAA has been implemented at the Center since April 14, 2003.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
For the record, I do not disagree with you one bit. There are posters I do not care to read from anymore simply because of how they present themselves...
HOWEVER...
In this particular case. What I see is you cheering on the OP for repeating variations of the same tired old proven lies and evidenceless fanciful rumors because you believe that somehow repetition of said lies is the only way to eventually get the truth out. I am sorry but I can only call that idea - not smart. Telling the same lies over and over and over and over again is not only a way to get to the truth, it is a great way to cloud, hide, and forget any truth. It is simply repetition of false nonsense. You cheered that on and even credit it with being a method for finding reality. Sorry but not only do I not agree but I feel it is that line of thinking that leads to a new one of these threads every other day. I feel these threads are sad and reflect poorly on the critical thinking skills of many ATS members. They seem to me, stupid. Cheering them on and claiming that they will somehow eventually lead to the truth seems...well you get it.
If you really took that much offense, then maybe it should make you think. Am I kind of a jerk? SURE AM. Is there a reason I would so petulant about such a statement as the one you made? SURE IS. I am sick of seeing the same people tell the same lies and then watch other people join in, toss all logic out the window, buy their crap no matter how many facts prove otherwise, the thread dies from lack of facts and we start over.
It is hard to keep feeling sorry for a kid that insists on touching the stove again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again, no matter how many times Reverend "Dr." Manning tells you it will not burn next time, IT WILL.