It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vor78
reply to post by grey580
They certainly can keep trying, but again, there are limits to their enforcement authority. US Code explicitly defines the penalty for non-compliance with the census, and that penalty is a fine.
Once the home owner refused all contact from the census worker and told him to leave the property, that should have been the end of the discussion.
It's interesting how Benevolent sides with the census taker and others side with the police. I guess you see what you want to see in this story.
Census takers have the right to take the census, but I don't think they have the right to trespass on your property. When I was reading the story and I got to the part where it said ""When I opened his gate and walked in ..." that's where the red flags went up. The census taker had no right to just walk into the guy's gate on his private property, uninvited.
Originally posted by vor78
Originally posted by Portugoal
Actually, by law, they are allowed to go into your house if you aren't answering, for the sake of the census.
Not true.
Most importantly, the Census Bureau will NEVER, under any circumstances, ask to enter your home.
Straight off the US Census website.
Again the census worker is empowered to repeatedly gain access to your home
Originally posted by vor78
reply to post by grey580
I don't doubt that the census worker will win his case. The Feds will protect their own, that much is a given.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
However, you can on the grounds of religious objection to answer all questions save the number of people and gender of persons living at a residence.
Originally posted by black cat
It's interesting how Benevolent sides with the census taker and others side with the police. I guess you see what you want to see in this story.
"I turned to him and said, 'Or what?' And he said, 'I'll lock you up.'" And I turned back and said, 'So make your case.'
Originally posted by sakokrap
BH, I find it difficult to stomach a blaring contradiction between your citing USC and your signature:
The height of personal responsibility and accountability is to live to one's own standards, regardless of the standards to which others choose to live."
For me, my personal standards do not involve forced labor for the bidding of any system- be it digging ditches or filling out forms.
I won't answer the questions for any reason- irrespective of the law- irrespective of the punishment for violating USC.