It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kharron
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Ahhh. My apologies then. I saw that eye-rolling emoticon and thought there was the taint of smarminess in your comment. My mistake. Carry on.
I can see how that looked like it. My bad.
Wanna hug it out?
Originally posted by ChrisCrikey
reply to post by Maxmars
No, I think it's more like $75 MILLION which is laughable given that the Valdez cleanup cost in the billions but this ceiling would be removed if significant safety violations occurred....this according to this article. It remains to be seen what kind of legal arguments BP will put up in paying "legitimate" claims. Imagine the legal maneuvers going on now. Part of the statute put in place after the Valdez spill.
The 1990 statute, which imposed liability as well as a cap, was passed because of the Exxon Valdez spill. It requires responsible parties to restore the land or “provide some equivalent resource to offset the loss,”
www.bloomberg.com...
[edit on 25-5-2010 by ChrisCrikey]
Originally posted by Kharron
On top of that, read in one of the threads here that the employees that died were valued at $10 million each, is that correct? Can't find it anywhere now.
At 11 employees dead, wouldn't that mean they MADE a $110 million profit just on "Dead Peasant" insurance?
Originally posted by Gamecock
Originally posted by Kharron
On top of that, read in one of the threads here that the employees that died were valued at $10 million each, is that correct? Can't find it anywhere now.
At 11 employees dead, wouldn't that mean they MADE a $110 million profit just on "Dead Peasant" insurance?
Wow, i hope that's not true, but i seriously do not doubt it. BP doesnt deserve any of that money. Plus, it's not like they just died by accident, they died because BP didnt take the proper precautions.
Originally posted by Kharron
I hope it's not true as well. Should have subscribed to that thread. But it would not surprise me if they did make money off of the deaths of their employees. It's just too easy to imagine a corporation like BP to employ the "dead peasant" insurance practices.
I just wish we had access to that information so we know exactly how much those lives were worth to them.