It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nuclear Traction Engine To Take Russian Spacemen to Mars

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:30 PM
link   

Nuclear Traction Engine To Take Russian Spacemen to Mars


english.pravda.ru

The way out is nuclear energy,” states Lopota.

This means that nuclear power rather than a rocket engine should pull a spacecraft headed to Mars.

Spacecrafts with nuclear engines are not just a dream. Back in the 1970s, the Soviet Union launched nuclear powered satellites. Recently a federal program “New generation of nuclear energy technologies for the period of 2010 - 2015 and up to 2020” was approved. This year, 500 million was allocated for creation of transport-power module based
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:30 PM
link   
During the last fifty or sixty years or so of space flight I am sure this idea has been kicked around a lot. Now it seems the Russians have set a time line for making it work. So one question now it seems might be, is this technology already our there and has been suppressed? If not then the next might be can they really make it work? Please post any ideas or thoughts you might have.

english.pravda.ru
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:34 PM
link   
What happens if one of these babies exploded on take off??



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:36 PM
link   
I would not say suppressed as much as ignored for fear of upsetting the rabid anti nuclear lobby.

The sooner we field workable space based fission reactors the sooner we might actually be able to travel somewhere interesting in sensible timescales.

Long long overdue.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by nephilim37
 


Game over. Lights out. Armageddon. Chrenobyl times 100.

Basically bad times.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by justwokeup


The sooner we field workable space based fission reactors the sooner we might actually be able to travel somewhere interesting in sensible timescales.

Long long overdue.



Thanks to everyone who is posting.
Justwokeup
I like what you said here. I would like to see space travel happen in a reasonable time scale. I don't know if this is the answer but we all know some new tech breakthrough will have to happen to make it work.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Not necessarily. It depends how you do it.

It would be retarded to launch the vessel, or the propulsion module of the vessel, with fuel rods inserted. If that blew up it would be a problem since you could end up with a cloud of radioactive particles.

However, if you planned to fuel the reactor in orbit you could launch small amounts of fissile material separately in hardened flasks. If the rocket failed you end up dropping one of these in the sea.

It would not be armageddon.

If we don't master control of the solar system an asteroid will kill us all sooner or later anyway. That would be armageddon.

I vote for not being extinct, all in favour raise their hands :-)



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 04:18 PM
link   
While I can understand people having trepidations about the saftey margins involved with a project as potentialy dangerous as this, I have to admit, that alongside the dangers , there could also be massive gains in knowlege made. Assuming that is ,that the tech could be made to function without causing obscene amounts of damage to the planet as it leaves it, or indeed causing death and cancers to anything caught in the blast from its exhaust.
If the Russian claims that they will be able to build a versatile nuclear capable rocket , and the platform proved safe and viable, then that would greatly advance the combined knowlege of humanity. I think thats got to be one of the most important goals of science in general.
I mean just the thought of being able to reduce interplanetary travel times by a significant factor is an amazing concept. Doing that and a myriad of incredible but extremely desirable other things as well .... If it can be done without occasioning massive devastation then Im all for it . Of course if not, then it shouldnt be done , but I hope they find a way.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by RedGolem
 


Nuclear based spacecraft are the only means we currently have at getting to and from the planets outside the moon viably. I applaud the Soviets in their endeavor to pave the way for the usage of nuclear based systems in space.

A bit about how these proposed nuclear engines would work.

The idea for using nuclear energy in space is not a new one by any means. Originally there were concepts of using nuclear blasts to propel a rocket by literally exploding nuclear packages behind a blast plate attached to the ship. As the explosion took place behind the ship, its blast would accelerate the ship forward.

This was needless to say not such a great idea. The harnessing of said explosions in a productive way was just not very viable, among other things.

The newer way that engines will use nuclear energy is Ion plasma based engines, that will simply use nuclear energy as an electrical generator of sorts.

The Ion based systems, and namely VASIMR, will use an ion plasma based system to exert a small but continuous force that will eventually get rockets to great speeds.

It is my hope that the Soviets continue to push the VASIMR Ion based system as it has great potential.

For more on what VASIMR is, see the following video.


Here is the VASIMR engine actually working in experimental conditions. You can see the pendulums placed inside the chamber which show the actual force being exerted.




Vasimr truly is the future of interplanetary space travel, and has the potential of being interstellar as well. Theoretically a space craft with constant force can actually continue to accelerate to near the speed of light, eventually. However interstellar will still take one or more generations living on board before they got to any close stars.

Also, for those worried about a possible catastrophe, one has to remember that there are literally hundred of nuclear powered submarines and ships traveling the worlds oceans at this very moments, and their safety record is impeccable.



[edit on 16-5-2010 by xmaddness]



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by xmaddness
 


xmaddness
some great information

thanks for posting, star
I do hope that technology will prove to be useful.



posted on May, 17 2010 @ 04:39 AM
link   
I read on another news site, that although this engine will be run using nuclear power, the fuel itself is not radioactive. The concept of nuclear power coming from a non radioactive source , and not PRODUCING rads is beyond me .
I have to say , I am impressed by what I have read so far, and I cannot help but say again how hopeful I am about this new project. I hope also, that this technology will be used in the future by all the nations of the earth to colonise the rest of our system, and maybe beyond!



posted on May, 17 2010 @ 04:46 AM
link   
reply to post by nephilim37
 


What happens if one of these babies exploded on take off??

Presumably this would happen in Russia and I hear they have extensive experience is such matters. They simply should know better. Mark Kamchucka off the "Risk" map.



posted on May, 17 2010 @ 05:17 AM
link   
reply to post by jbmitch
 


Well one or two of the news agencies covering this, say that the fuel source itself is not radioactive, so apart from any incendiary damage to the blast zone of such an explosion, I would have thought that fallout would be minimal, certainly nothing like an atom bomb, or even that unspellable nuclear accident (Cannot spell that word even after half a decade trying).



posted on May, 17 2010 @ 05:48 AM
link   
They need to launch this thing from around Moscow. That way by the time it leaves Russian territory it should be in orbit.



posted on May, 17 2010 @ 06:56 AM
link   
The russians wouldnt be my first choice to prototype and test something like this, but it has to be done.

In saying that.. I reackon the yanks have already done it.


[edit on 17-5-2010 by Agit8dChop]



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join