It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by CAELENIUM
This Glacial Rebound together with Plate Tectonics was new science when I was a student. It is now common knowledge and fully accepted scientifically. However it all raises some profound questions. Assuming that the Earth is a solid to the core mass of atomic matter then it logically follows that order for the Earth as such a solid sphere of mass to be growing in diameter there would have to be an influx of fresh material from space. Well there are the occassional meteor or even occassional asteroid even but these are not sufficient to explain Plate Tectonics. It is my opinion that Plate Tectonics and Glacial Rebound are proof that the Earth as a planet is a hollow sphere with a crustal thickness of no more than 30 kilometres. So that in fact the planet Earth is a fragile bubble that could easilly burst. In fact all stars and planets are such fragile hollow sphere. Gravity is not understood and is something radically different than which most people are thinking it to be. The Earth is not held together by gravity. The Earth is in fact held together by the magnetic force between atoms. Gravity militates in a downwards vertical polarity whilst magnetism between atoms militates in a horizontal polarization holding the atoms together into crystaline structures. These forces work such that planets and stars are hollow. So this begs the question what are volcano ? Well in my hollow plants theory the volcano are driven by electric tensions in that fragile crust. What is it making stars shine ? Electric forces that build up as a consequence of the Cosmic Ray energy which is also the force that creates gravity and magnetism.
Ummmm...I am currently taking Astronomy at Devry and ummm either pretty much EVERYTHING you said is COMPLETELY whacked or out there, or all of my curriculum is a total lie :-/ What is making stars shine? Are you serious or just messin lol
Originally posted by Revenaut
reply to post by warpcrafter
I agree that this is a far-fetched theory. Most of all because the weight of the ice that is now water is now spread around the oceans so it doesnt cause nearly as much pressure that it did when it was ice and on land. Besides the postglacial adjustment is a relatively slow process, so if it was to go the other way in this case i figure it would be even slower.
Here's one link of postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia (where i live)
www.agu.org...
Originally posted by Ezzedeen
reply to post by tothetenthpower
I was thinking, and I'm not that well read on the subject, but if the universe is expanding and the total mass of the universe is still the same then maybe, just like there is atmospheric pressure and water pressure in the ocean then there could be universal pressure of space. So just like if a balloon grows when the outside pressure decreases then maybe because the universe is expanding the "universe" pressure is decreasing causing all things in the universe, like planets to expand like the balloon does. The mass remains the same but because of less pressure on the outside the growth in volume. What do you think?
Originally posted by Ezzedeen
reply to post by AaronTheSpeaker
I saw that too. And why all the Hebrew writing on his garment?
Originally posted by seanizle
Wow, very interesting theory. Chem-trails could actually be saving us from radiation high up in the atmosphere. It would make sense when you think about it, there have been so many nucleus tests done on this planet in the last 100 years. It would also explain why so many politicians and military officials have been pushing global warming, to cover up the fact that their own stupidity of detonating nuclear weapons is what has caused the melting of the glaciers.
Originally posted by seanizle
Wow, very interesting theory. Chem-trails could actually be saving us from radiation high up in the atmosphere. It would make sense when you think about it, there have been so many nucleus tests done on this planet in the last 100 years. It would also explain why so many politicians and military officials have been pushing global warming, to cover up the fact that their own stupidity of detonating nuclear weapons is what has caused the melting of the glaciers.
Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
During the ice age massive amounts of land were above sea level.
After the melting started it stabilized until recently according to this theory. That's why we never saw anything that could link to this.
What I understand from a massive ice sheet on land is that the weight of it pushes the landmass in to the Earth.When it's gone the Earth moves up again very slowly.I can imagine stress also caused a higher ocean floor, it should sink when the land goes up and when there is more water pushing it down. This means there would be 2 catalysts making the ocean floor sink.
I don't think this is such a weird theory at all actually.
But with an expanding Earth I would think that there would be less weight pushing down because of a bigger capacity that would disperse the weight more.
But I'm just thinking out loud here.