posted on May, 7 2010 @ 09:11 PM
Because I do not have air samples, or photos, or a signed confession by the perpetrators DOES NOT end the debate.
If I witnessed a murder yet did not have photos, or blood samples, or a signed confession DOES NOT mean I did not witness a murder.
Crop dusters and fire-fighting aircraft are a completely different sort. They operate within 1,000 ft of the ground and are completely irrelevant to
this debate. I expect even a lay-person to be able to identify the difference between crop dusting, firefighting, and high flying airliners producing
contrails or Chemtrails as easily as we can tell the difference between a Cardinal and an Eagle (Size, shape, color, and most importantly:
When I saw the Chemtrail activity with my own eyes I KNEW it was suspicious because of the behavior of the aircraft(s) and the behavior of the
Let me explain my eye-witness account:
I was out of town for the weekend at a friend's cabin. In the north USA. I am reluctant to give out to much personal details due to my paranoia and
Anyways... I was outdoors all day on a Saturday on the lake. I was in observance of the same sky all day from 9am to sundown.
The morning began crystal clear. It was a hot mid-summer day about 2 years ago. When we headed out for morning fishing and lunch on the pontoon boat I
remember seeing the occasional airliner cruising on by leaving no trails. Around 10am a white four-engine aircraft (I believe to have been a KC-135)
at cruising altitude leaving a thick white billowing cloud behind it.
Now with regards to my visual acuity and perception. I have perfect vision and during college was a member of the competitive aviation team, one event
is called ACID: Aircraft Identification.
Back to the eye-witness account: I saw this aircraft fly from sky's edge to sky's edge carving a single cloud into the sky. Withing a few minutes a
second IDENTICAL aircraft about 5 miles parallel to the original entered and flew a direct parallel to the first trail. Both aircraft were present in
the same sky for a few minutes.
As I watched closely I witnessed a suspiciously large cloud being put out DIRECTLY behind the aircraft. It appeared to be trailing from many points
along the aircraft wing INCLUDING the wing tips.
I watched the clouds themselves closely as I became increasingly suspicious. The cloud did not appear to behave like a normal cloud. It seemed to
spread and expand with unusually strong intent.
The clouds hung in the sky without moving much. But they did spread. They grew thick and seemed to increase with depth and size overtime without the
slightest amount of dissipation.
Around 11am I witnessed a similar, or the same, aircraft enter the sky from the opposite direction 180 degrees from where the first trails were
initiated. This aircraft flew another parallel to the first two lines. Creating three thick parallel lines in the sky with not another single cloud in
A few minutes later another similar aircraft proceeded along side the 3rd trail creating a total of 4 parallel trails in the sky by around 12pm.
During this period I witnessed a number of other aircraft in the sky at various altitudes. Including airliners of similar altitude to the spray
aircraft leaving NO TRAILS. The other aircraft which I witnessed varied from small 2 engine commercial airliners to the occasional larger 4-engine
types at cruising altitudes.
This spraying behavior continued through the afternoon until by 4pm there were 10 parallel trails laid out across the sky as if in a search pattern or
lawn-mowing pattern. The trails increased in size as the day went on. The first clouds spread out and by 4 pm the original trails were unnoticeable.
What remained was and evenly dispersed haze the blanketed the sky.
The last time I saw the aircraft was around 3 or 4pm. By around 6pm all but the last made trails had spread out completely creating a FULL SKY BLANKET
of haze. Still no other clouds or contrails were created this day from any other aircraft and various altitudes.
Were it not for this pattern of parallel trails the sky would have been clear and blue all day and into the evening.
Now before the obvious questions arise I will address them.
Q. Why did I not take video or photos of this?
A. This event which I describe was my awakening to the Chemtrail question. As the event unfolded above me I did not begin to pay close attention until
about the 3 or 4th waves of aircraft. I saw the whole thing unfold above me. But was not seriously suspicious until late in the day. At which point I
did seek a camera but there was none on the boat. (I didnt head out that day hunting for Chemtrails.) By the time I got back to the cabin it was 5pm
and the clouds were entirely a haze but the last two and the aircraft were gone. The photos would have been meaningless.
Q. That is a convenient story about having no camera.
A. Considering that now I realize how important this day was to awakening me to the suspicious activity I am remorseful to say the least that a camera
was not on hand. I believe a daylong time lapse video of this event would be shocking to most people. Like Andrew Dufrense said in Shawshank
Redemption when asked to provide proof of his story "I find it decidedly INCONVENIENT that I cannot".
I have seen plenty of regular contrails. In fact I suspect that about 99% of the trails left by aircraft seen are normal contrails put out by regular
everyday airliners. These clouds mimic car exhaust. More visible the colder it gets. Also how fast they dissipate depends on the temperature.
A normal contrail will dissipate with some degree over time. They may spread but they will dissipate in intensity to some degree.
More than this though I propose that the BEHAVIOR of the clouds and the aircraft is more usable proof of some artificial cloud forming activity.
Patterns of similar aircraft creating cloud patterns which would be logical if ones intent was to FILL THE SKY with a haze.
This debate is constantly derailed and overgeneralized by the uninformed who take photos of regular contrails and post them as proof of Chemtrails.
Often these attempts are easily debunked by the avid debunker.
These debunkings serve the purpose of generalizing that the ENTIRE Chemtrail question is debunked. When, of course, this is an ignorant over
I am hoping this thread will encourage others TO HELP ME continue to search for the truth about these activities. To say ANYONE can prove that a
secret program DOES NOT exist is preposterous. This thread is about a search for truth. If this patent turns out to not be attached to the actual
suspicious activity; it will not close the debate or prove to me that Chemtrails do not exist.