It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by FoosM
Whats the difference to planning to spend one day in space vrs 30 during a solar flare event?
Or let me say it this way, is there a real difference planning to spend one day in a pool of hungry sharks, vrs say 30?
I think you will find that there were no "major" solar flare events during the Apollo missions.
Originally posted by backinblack
In fact Kaysing was actually questioning Apollo before 11 even landed on the moon..
Even before July 1969, he had "a hunch, an intuition, ... a true conviction" and decided that he didn't believe that anyone was going to the moon.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by FoosM
Whats the difference to planning to spend one day in space vrs 30 during a solar flare event?
Or let me say it this way, is there a real difference planning to spend one day in a pool of hungry sharks, vrs say 30?
I think you will find that there were no "major" solar flare events during the Apollo missions.
Oh I found several.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Ove38
Well done..
So yes, Proud Bird was wrong..
In fact Kaysing was actually questioning Apollo before 11 even landed on the moon..
Even before July 1969, he had "a hunch, an intuition, ... a true conviction" and decided that he didn't believe that anyone was going to the moon.
Originally posted by Logical one
Apollo Astronaut Jim Lovell makes his feelings perfectly clear to Bill Kaysing after Kaysing hands Lovell a copy of his book at a convention in San Jose in June 1996.
Letter to Bill Kaysing June 24 1996:
"I personally made two trips to the moon .... You heard my speech, and I am not accustomed to making up stories for my audience." (.......) "If you sincerely believe the United States faked the lunar landings then you are truly a tragic figure. You, like Don Quixote, are 'tilting windmills,' and have wasted precious hours of your life in a futile quest. Take my advice. Tear up your manuscript and pursue a project that has some meaning. Leave a legacy you can be proud of, not some trash whose readers will doubt your sanity. - Jim Lovell.
Originally posted by Ove38
Astronaut Jim Lovell never touched the surface of the moon, right ?edit on 29-10-2011 by Ove38 because: (no reason given)
See how each photo neatly overlaps with the next. See how well exposed they are.
Can you find any motion blur?
Its done so well, you would assume the astronaut had used a tripod and metered the shots.
It does not look like this was taken
1. with a camera attached to a chest of a breathing person.
2. with a person wearing a bulky pressure suit
3. with a camera that lacked a viewfinder.
4. without a light meter.
5. without pauses
6. with a pistol grip release.
7. with 5 psi pressurized gloves.
8. with a manual camera.
9. with a quick pan.
10. on the moon.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Originally posted by arbiture
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
Hey, we did share with quite a number of groups around the world, though not all, or at once. As for the rocks "being terrestrial" it would seem they may actually have been at one point. Not long after the early Earth was formed we (it seems) were hit by a Mars size planet, the resulting material was what formed the Earths moon. Apollo helped create that theory of where our moon came from.
Top scientists still disagree amongst themselves regarding the origins of the Moon. Harrison Schmitt, Apollo 17, advocates the 'moon capture' theory which is totally different from the 'large-body impact' theory. But again - how credible is he?
Schmitt is a fervent and persistent anti-communist who firmly believes that the the former Soviet Union created the environmental movement!
The origin of our moon is still a scientific mystery. NASA has done nothing in the last 40 years which can advance any of the moon origin theories. That's why there is a New Race to the Moon happening now!
Originally posted by FoosM
See how each photo neatly overlaps with the next. See how well exposed they are.
Can you find any motion blur?
Its done so well, you would assume the astronaut had used a tripod and metered the shots.
It does not look like this was taken
1. with a camera attached to a chest of a breathing person.
2. with a person wearing a bulky pressure suit
3. with a camera that lacked a viewfinder.
4. without a light meter.
5. without pauses
6. with a pistol grip release.
7. with 5 psi pressurized gloves.
8. with a manual camera.
9. with a quick pan.
10. on the moon.
Originally posted by FoosM
..........
7. with 5 psi pressurized gloves.
Operating Pressure: 3.7 psi (25.5 kPa)
Originally posted by FoosM
In that video, it appears that Scott does take that Pan pretty quick.
It takes him about 25 seconds to make 18 photos.
Thats pretty rapid. As you can see in the video, he is just turning, barely taking any pauses for composing shots. Like he is shooting with a video camera.
See how each photo neatly overlaps with the next. See how well exposed they are.
Can you find any motion blur?
Its done so well, you would assume the astronaut had used a tripod and metered the shots.
Originally posted by FoosM
In that video, it appears that Scott does take that Pan pretty quick.
It takes him about 25 seconds to make 18 photos.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Ove38
Astronaut Jim Lovell never touched the surface of the moon, right ?
And what is the point you are trying to make?
Originally posted by Ove38
He said "I personally made two trips to the moon"
He said "I personally made two trips to the moon"
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by Ove38
He said "I personally made two trips to the moon"
Yes, he did. Apollo 8 and Apollo 13. Neither landed on the Moon obviously, but he still made two trips to it.
But never reached it
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Ove38
But never reached it
Technically, both flights went past the Moon. Yep, both went around the far side.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
1. Ferdinand Marcos, Philippines
2. Nguyen VanTheiu, South Viet Nam
3. Chiang Kai-shek, Tawain
+134 more heads of state received Apollo 11 moon rocks