Young Aussie genius whipping NASA in Moon Hoax Debate!

Originally posted by FoosM
Bzzzz!
Wrong answer.
Thanks for trying though.

I'm done with you

you are a coward

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

 

Harrison Schmitt- the geologist who walked on the moon (Apollo 17)- does not agree with Nemchin -the geologist who never walked on the moon- about one crucial detail : how the moon was formed.

Was Harrison Schmitt walking on the surface of the Moon when it was formed?

Care to explain how 700 boxes of telemetry tapes (the contents of Accession #69A4099) got lost between the National Archives & Goddard SFC? It's only 15 miles/24 km between the two locations.

Originally posted by syrinx high priest

Originally posted by FoosM
Bzzzz!
Wrong answer.
Thanks for trying though.

I'm done with you

you are a coward

Nope. You played the game wrong that's why you got buzzed. And you were a poor loser too ...

This is the internet. Your use of Ad Hominem is an objective measurement of your abilities to use grammar, logic and rhetoric effectively. You failed to debunk Jarrah White.

There you go Apollogists! Here are the contaminated Apollo 11 moon rocks.

There were more incidents with moon rocks...

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter



Guess you didn't notice the date??

August, 1969.

SO, your point?? Oh, yeah.....the samples from the Moon, returned by Apollo, WERE real and there was an initial abundance of caution and concern about possibilities of contamination, just to be on the safe side (and prevent any public outcry from the loonies who existed, back then, about the "dangers" presented by bringing back samples from the Moon).

Recall the book "Andromeda Strain" (made into a movie in 1971).

It came out in.....1969!:

books.google.com...

The Andromeda Strain is Michael Crichton's first novel. [color=gold]Written in 1969, the technology is a little dated -- what was cutting-edge is now fairly commonplace ...

Read Full Review


Is this ever going to end? This scraping the bottom of the desperation barrel, for "Hoax" believers??

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


Your article states that the 4 people were contaminated by exposure to Lunar samples. Not that the Lunar samples were contaminated. Either way, I fail to see how is this evidence that the Apollo missions, and the samples, were faked.

He's talking about the Apollo 11 moon rocks in the quarantined Lunar Receiving Laboratory...

"The number could be fairly high with people wandering in and out all day. "

There's the guy in charge W. W. Kemmerer.

El Baz

The question is, if the moon truly is lifeless and ordinary, then why so much secrecy about these findings? Surprisingly, the affirmation on the concealment of the findings on the moon and unusual encounters by the astronauts out there came from none other than the NASA supreme Dr Farouk El-Baz. Few words on Dr El-Baz are in order as he is the Egyptian-American Geologist who, during the Apollo programme years (1967 to 1972) was the supervisor of Lunar Science Planning at Bellcomm Inc. which worked with NASA extensively, secretary of the Landing Site Selection Committee to the moon, principal investigator of visual observations and photography and chairman of the Astronaut training group.

Don Wilson, author of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon says in his book, Dr El-Baz did admit “not every discovery has been announced”! The noted NASA scientist admitted during an interview that there were secret searches for various things on the moon and in his own words, “a huge bridge-like structure in Mare Crisium (a region on the moon) has been reported…That is all I can say about it”. When asked if they were intelligently placed artifacts of extra-terrestrial origin, Dr El-Baz, although did not say yes, nevertheless went on to say, “Almost anything is possible”.

Source


Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter




Brilliant.


Now, start a thread in "Aliens and UFOs", since that sort of thing belongs there.


And again....what part of that "dis-proves" Apollo? And, supports Jarrah White and his vacuous videos??

Seems to me, these latest posts are confirming Apollo, but attempting to steer this thread over to the aforementioned "Aliens and UFOs" aspect.....

Originally posted by ProudBird
Is this ever going to end? This scraping the bottom of the desperation barrel, for "Hoax" believers??

You have it backwards.

A believer is an Apollo Cult member who studies the Sacred Apollo Scriptures and Apollogizes for the NASA Orthodox Church. Your mind is already zipped up.

A skeptic looks at the evidence in order to make up their own mind. Farouk El Baz said "Not every discovery has been announced!". He should know right?... he's one that's been covering it up all this time!

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

A skeptic looks at the evidence in order to make up their own mind.

Yeah...except a proper "skeptic" needs to be well educated and thoroughly cognizant of many areas of science, engineering, and other disciplines.

On the other hand, we have seen Jarrah White (the *topic* here, if you'll recall) who has been shown repeatedly to be inept and misleading in his 500+ YouTube videos. Displaying poor knowledge and investigative skills, blatantly seen cherry-picking information in order to tailor his "arguments" to meet his goals, and ultimately (when faced with challenges from people who directly called him on his BS...people who had the education, and backgrounds, to do so)....when called out, Jarrah White resorted to merely *attacking* his opponents, rather than using what he should have....IF he thought he was correct, then his facts would have *spoken* for themselves.

Of course, we know he has no "facts"...he is misguided, as were the *idols* he has hitched his wagon onto....

His apparent idols, Bill Kaysing and of course, the inimitable, and endlessly humourous, Ralph Rene'.


So....to be a proper "skeptic", one has t at least have the benefit of intelligence and sanity, and most importantly...

....facts on his/her side.

Else? Pfffft.......!

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
There you go Apollogists! Here are the contaminated Apollo 11 moon rocks.

I love how they added the line "including an attractive woman".
And, how is injecting moon dust in mice going to tell you anything?
What kind of pseudoscience were they conducting here?

Originally posted by jra
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

 

Your article states that the 4 people were contaminated by exposure to Lunar samples. Not that the Lunar samples were contaminated. Either way, I fail to see how is this evidence that the Apollo missions, and the samples, were faked.

Well, why is NASA in a tizzy about this when the Astronauts where already exposed to moon samples?

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
El Baz

Don Wilson, author of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon says in his book, Dr El-Baz did admit “not every discovery has been announced”! The noted NASA scientist admitted during an interview that there were secret searches for various things on the moon and in his own words, “a huge bridge-like structure in Mare Crisium (a region on the moon) has been reported…That is all I can say about it”. When asked if they were intelligently placed artifacts of extra-terrestrial origin, Dr El-Baz, although did not say yes, nevertheless went on to say, “Almost anything is possible”.

Oh great, NASA's UFO agenda is in high gear.
What a load of deceptive people you got working at NASA.

reply to post by FoosM


REFERRING to the many, many, many OFF-TOPIC posts being presented by not only this username on AboveTopSecret.com, but by another who is quit3e obvious to the audience of readers/viewers....


Is there a chance, at all, that one or both of you can begin to again address the thread's OP??

"OP", for those who may just be tuning in, is a *short-hand* we use here on ATS.com, or *abovetopsecret.com*, however you access it.....anyway, the two letters "O" and "P" mean "Original" "Poster"...and this is about the very first "post" (or, text entry) that you see on the FIRST PAGE of a thread (please click on the highlighted text....it will take your browser on journeys of safe adventure...)

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Ove38

 

This is really silly, you know how they did it.

I thought they did it by building the sets on an angle.

Wires, sets on angle, spotlights, dummies, slow motion, scotch tape, models, transparencies, airbrushing, superimposing, you name it, they did it all.

Originally posted by FoosM

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
There you go Apollogists! Here are the contaminated Apollo 11 moon rocks.

I love how they added the line "including an attractive woman".
And, how is injecting moon dust in mice going to tell you anything?
What kind of pseudoscience were they conducting here?

edit on 10-10-2011 by FoosM because: (no reason given)

I think if the vacuum chamber and vacuum glove were compromised then the lunar samples were probably contaminated. Good Job NASA... went all the way to the moon to bring back potentially lethal untested moon rocks that could have wiped out the human race...

reply to post by Ove38

Wires, sets on angle, spotlights, dummies, slow motion, scotch tape, models, transparencies, airbrushing, superimposing, you name it, they did it all.

All those techniques used during long, unbroken sequences? That in and of itself would be a remarkable achievement. Now all you have to do is prove it. Should be easy: there must be dozens of stage carpenters, hundreds of matte artists, thousand of electricians and painters and model makers... Just find one!

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

I think if the vacuum chamber and vacuum glove were compromised then the lunar samples were probably contaminated. Good Job NASA... went all the way to the moon to bring back potentially lethal untested moon rocks that could have wiped out the human race...

Tons of extra-terrestrial material enters the Earth's atmosphere every year in the form of meteors and micro-meteorites. No-one but Fred Hoyle seemed to think this has any affect on human health. The quarantine was never anything more than a sop to nervous members of the public.