It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Young Aussie genius whipping NASA in Moon Hoax Debate!

page: 603
377
<< 600  601  602    604  605  606 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ove38

This is really silly, you know how they did it.





Hey look, one massive light source!
Make the sky red, and you can fool people its Mars.




posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



But, if you think Apollo 11 has 2 hours of live unbroken video, I would like to see it.
Post here:


02e5a89.netsolstores.com...

Maybe Jarrah will let you borrow his copy.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by FoosM
 


are you following the thread ?

A/Prof Alexander Nemchin
BSc, MSc (St Petersburg) PhD (Curtin)
Tel: +61 (0)8 9266 2445
Fax: +61 (0)8 9266 3153
Room: 312-205
A.Nemchin@curtin.edu.au

don't punk out. this is a direct challenge

put up or shut up


I think you were already challenged.

Did Professor Alexander Nemchin
*see* and *test* all the lunar material that was brought back?



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
 



But, if you think Apollo 11 has 2 hours of live unbroken video, I would like to see it.
Post here:


02e5a89.netsolstores.com...

Maybe Jarrah will let you borrow his copy.




Wow DJ, admit defeat already.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Wow DJ, admit defeat already.


I already have; there is no amount of evidence that will persuade Jarrah's brainwashed minions that he is anything but a genius.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Did Professor Alexander Nemchin
*see* and *test* all the lunar material that was brought back?


Remember the Moon Hoaxers' standards of evidence: unless they have personally witnessed every single tiny detail of absolutely everything, it must necessarily be false. (Unless of course Bill Kaysing got it from a friend of a friend, in which case it must be true.)



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Hey look, one massive light source!


And nice, soft edges with more distant objects gradually turning softer and bluer.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 



This is really silly, you know how they did it.


I thought they did it by building the sets on an angle.


jra

posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM
Because you said LIVE.
I dont know how that answers your question,
but you made that assertion and thats what I was pointing out.
Film is not LIVE.


No kidding... I'm well aware that the clip that was being discussed was 16mm DAC film and I never said it was live. But OVE made the claim that it was all done in the desert. I was asking how that would have been done for all the formats (live video, 16mm film, 70mm film). Do you understand now?



A. There are deserts on this planet without any visible vegetation.
B. They could have made an artificial location. See our posts on the USGS.


Are any of them an exact match to locations on the Moon? Because it sure doesn't look like it.


C. If you think they could land men on the moon in the 1960's, what makes you think their post processing techniques weren't advanced?


I fail to see how technology for going to the Moon relates to post-processing video and film.


But, if you think Apollo 11 has 2 hours of live unbroken video, I would like to see it.
Post here:


You can go to the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal and watch the entire Apollo 11 EVA. The have it broken up in small parts due to bandwidth reasons, but there is nothing stopping you from downloading all the parts and putting them back together. Or you can buy the DVD sets from spacecraft films.

And there is no live video during any of the traverses in the LRV in the later missions. They had to turn off the live video while moving. Only during the stops at the various geology stations would the live video be on.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


Is this a case of blowing the whistle??


edit on 10/9/2011 by SayonaraJupiter because: edit pic size



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:18 PM
link   
reply to post by jra
 



They had to turn off the live video while moving.


Obviously, because the live TV signal required the unidirectional antenna, in order to transmit the signals

Yes?



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


Think about this FoosM,

Harrison Schmitt- the geologist who walked on the moon (Apollo 17)- does not agree with Nemchin -the geologist who never walked on the moon- about one crucial detail : how the moon was formed.

Schmitt believes the moon is a "captured planet".
Nemchin believes the moon is the result of a "giant impact" and the moon separated from Earth.

Who is the more credible scientist?





posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



What a cheap shot!


I agree, you've been doing nothing but taking cheap shots by posting huge frame-grabs in order to "fast forward" the thread past points you cannot defend. Pathetic.


You mad because NASA didn't respond to you about the press conferences?




posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Harrison Schmitt- the geologist who walked on the moon (Apollo 17)- does not agree with Nemchin -the geologist who never walked on the moon- about one crucial detail : how the moon was formed.


Was Harrison Schmitt walking on the surface of the Moon when it was formed?



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by FoosM
 


are you following the thread ?

A/Prof Alexander Nemchin
BSc, MSc (St Petersburg) PhD (Curtin)
Tel: +61 (0)8 9266 2445
Fax: +61 (0)8 9266 3153
Room: 312-205
A.Nemchin@curtin.edu.au

don't punk out. this is a direct challenge

put up or shut up


I think you were already challenged.

Did Professor Alexander Nemchin
*see* and *test* all the lunar material that was brought back?


that was really really weak and the worst part is you know it !

you know full well 1 apollo moon rock proves the case and ends the debate

I knew you didn't have it in you

from now on, don't even bring up the rocks, because you don't have the guts to look behind the curtain and see for yourself what is there

no guts at all



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by FoosM
 


Think about this FoosM,

Harrison Schmitt- the geologist who walked on the moon (Apollo 17)- does not agree with Nemchin -the geologist who never walked on the moon- about one crucial detail : how the moon was formed.

Schmitt believes the moon is a "captured planet".
Nemchin believes the moon is the result of a "giant impact" and the moon separated from Earth.

Who is the more credible scientist?




credibility isn't the issue, and neither is how the moon was formed. does schmitt dispute the lunar samples are from the moon ?

THAT would be a crucial detail

foos has no stones, will YOU contact Nemchin ?
edit on 9-10-2011 by syrinx high priest because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



It really doesn't matter much when scientists in a particular field of expertise happen to disagree on certain theories, even as major as the genesis of the Moon.

Frankly, the point is moot as it relates to Apollo, so why mention it??

Of course, Dr. Schmitt may not have the exact same level of science knowledge, that is needed to properly study the Lunar samples. He is at most an Earth geologist, who was given a crash-course in Lunar *selenology* before the Apollo 17 mission. His experience, though, was useful on the mission, to spot very interesting samples, for those who would spend the many following decades really studying them.

However, specialization is required, and obtained, by those who devote their entire careers to focus on one specific aspect of the field they have chosen to work in.

Hopefully you understand the concept of specialization?? If you need a heart transplant, do you trot down to the local neurosurgeon?? Both are highly, highly trained Medical Doctors, right? Been to school, graduated, all that.

So, if you don't choose the neurosurgeon to perform your heart transplant, then why not? What if I told you he/she graduated top of his/her MD University....what, you still prefer the heart specialist? Any particular reason?


As to Harrison Schmitt....he is more an entrepreneur, nowadays. He's excited about the potential of returns to the Moon, not only for the continuing science, but because of the ("potential") for profit, via private enterprise.

Buy his book he'd like that:

www.amazon.com...

edit on Sun 9 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Is this a case of blowing the whistle??


No, it's a case of having some fun:


More Creativity - Fun and Inspiration

The following creations show the fun side of being an Apollo enthusiast. Many of the offerings use Apollo images and scenes as a basis, but with unexpected additions. Some show members of the ALSJ/AFJ team having Apollo-like adventures here on Planet Earth. And still other offerings make use of Apollo material for various artistic purposes. Enjoy!

...

19 July 2007

David Harland returns to the ever-popular theme of the Lunar Grand Prix ( 1.1 Mb ).


www.hq.nasa.gov...



You might also enjoy these, from the same source:

www.hq.nasa.gov...

www.hq.nasa.gov...



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by syrinx high priest

Originally posted by FoosM

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to post by FoosM
 


are you following the thread ?

A/Prof Alexander Nemchin
BSc, MSc (St Petersburg) PhD (Curtin)
Tel: +61 (0)8 9266 2445
Fax: +61 (0)8 9266 3153
Room: 312-205
A.Nemchin@curtin.edu.au

don't punk out. this is a direct challenge

put up or shut up


I think you were already challenged.

Did Professor Alexander Nemchin
*see* and *test* all the lunar material that was brought back?


that was really really weak and the worst part is you know it !

you know full well 1 apollo moon rock proves the case and ends the debate



Bzzzz!
Wrong answer.
Thanks for trying though.



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird

So, if you don't choose the neurosurgeon to perform your heart transplant, then why not? He graduated top of his MD classes....what, you still prefer the heart specialist? Any particular reason?


Boy that was a convoluted response.
And in the end you contradicted yourself.



new topics

top topics



 
377
<< 600  601  602    604  605  606 >>

log in

join