It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
When Iran, Korea (I assume you mean the DPRK) and Zimbabwe have shown any capability or interest in planetary defense we can discuss that (in another thread). In this thread that topic is irrelevant.
Due to debris from the explosion, the navigation system was unreliable.
They did not even have power to gimbal the engine so we could begin an immediate return to Earth.
To return the crew to Earth as quickly and safely as possible, only a single pass around the Moon was made, in what is called a free return trajectory, which uses the Moon's gravity to "slingshot" the spacecraft back to Earth. To enter this trajectory, a significant course correction was required. This would normally have been a simple procedure, using the SM propulsion engine, but the flight controllers did not know exactly how much damage the service module had taken and did not want to risk firing the main engine.
Because of the severe electrical power limitations following the explosion, no live TV broadcasts were made from the craft for the remainder of the mission; network commentators used models and animated footage to illustrate their coverage.
Three fuel cells, two oxygen tanks, and two hydrogen tanks are located in Sector 4. The damaged area is located above the S-band high gain antenna.
Originally posted by DJW001 reply to post by FoosM
Thats why they took photos of the Moon and other nonsense, right?
Yes, because taking photos of the Moon was part of the mission, remember? Even in crisis mode, they attempted to complete as much of the mission as possible.
Contrast this for effect:
If you were pretty sure you were going to die a horrible death and no-one would ever be able to recover your body or your camera, would you take pictures...
If you were pretty sure you were going to die a horrible death and no-one would ever be able to recover your body or your camera, would you take pictures of yourself and your crew-mates? As usual, your argument is based on the fallacy that if someone behaves other than the way you would in a given situation, the situation must not have happened.
Why should I answer this question, when you failed to address mine? I spoke about floating objects in space. multiple ships, lack of condensation on astronaut's breath. You come back floating objects with interior shots that can be easily done in LEO or done in similar manner as they did the Apollo 13 the movie? I mean what is this silly distraction all about?
Also, when the "explosion" occured, did the Astronauts feel or hear that it happened? If they didnt, why not?
55:56:10 - Haise: "Okay. Right now, Houston, the voltage is --
is looking good. And we had a pretty large bang associated
with the caution and warning there. And as I recall, main B
was the one that had an amp spike on it once before.
I thought they had no power for the engine anyway?
They did have film and photos, which, as I stated before, was severely lacking.
The other question that I have is, how where they able to keep talking to each other if the power was cut?
How did the antenna work? And how come it didnt get damaged during the explosion?
Originally posted by DJW001
As for the astronaut's breath, would you see noticeable vapor condensation at 5 psi?
Originally posted by DJW001
The power was cut, but they still had at least one power cell online. Telemetry would be the communications priority, and voice. The antenna was a fancy piece of metal pointing in the direction of Earth; so long as the wire between the transmitter and the antenna wasn't cut, it would work.
The command module was not powered down until approximately 2 hours after the explosion. During those hours, the command module was running on its re-entry batteries and one barely functioning fuel cell. When oxygen tank number one finished its slow leak into space, the last surviving fuel cell was shut down and the crew powered down the command module to save the remaining battery power for later entering Earth’s atmosphere.
So your saying as long as that fuel cell was online telemetry and voice was possible.
So you would have to agree that if there was no fuel cell telemetry, voice, etc would stop as well.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by DJW001
The power was cut, but they still had at least one power cell online. Telemetry would be the communications priority, and voice. The antenna was a fancy piece of metal pointing in the direction of Earth; so long as the wire between the transmitter and the antenna wasn't cut, it would work.
Source?
So your saying as long as that fuel cell was online telemetry and voice was possible.
So you would have to agree that if there was no fuel cell telemetry, voice, etc would stop as well.
So...
The command module was not powered down until approximately 2 hours after the explosion. During those hours, the command module was running on its re-entry batteries and one barely functioning fuel cell. When oxygen tank number one finished its slow leak into space, the last surviving fuel cell was shut down and the crew powered down the command module to save the remaining battery power for later entering Earth’s atmosphere.
They didn't freeze because it never got below freezing even in the shut down CSM. Recall the LM was still operating* and people produce heat and the vehicle will get some heating from the Sun (hence the "BBQ roll"). It's not like it got cold immedately after the incident. They were flying, in effect, in a Thermos bottle. EDIT : Didn't nataylor cover all this in a prior post ? I think he did.
Originally posted by FoosM
Exactly, stay on topic.
Where at the photo and video evidence that the astronauts were cold in Apollo 13?
Where is the condensation of their breath? The shivering? Pallid looks? Proof that they were almost freezing?
Though I wonder why they just didnt freeze? What kept them from freezing actually?
Later, they powered down all of the systems in the LM except those required for life support, communications, and environmental control.
You're kidding ... right ? There are all sorts of accounts of the crew hearing a loud bang and thinking it was Haize playing a joke. From your own link ...
Originally posted by FoosM
Also, when the "explosion" occured, did the Astronauts feel or hear that it happened? If they didnt, why not?
This Is No Joke
Immediately after attempting to follow Houston Flight Control’s last order to stir the cryo tanks, Astronaut Jack Swigert heard a loud bang and felt a shudder throughout the ship. Command module pilot, Fred Haize, who was still down in Aquarius after the television broadcast, and mission commander, Jim Lovell, who was in between, gathering cables up, both heard the sound, but at first thought it was a standard joke previously played by Fred Haize. It was no joke.
Seeing the expression on Jack Swigert’s face, Jim Lovell knew immediately that there was a real problem and hurried into the CSM to join his Lunar module pilot. Things did not look good. Alarms were going off as voltage levels of the main power supplies were dropping rapidly. If power was completely lost, the ship had a battery backup, which would last for about ten hours. Apollo 13, unfortunately, was 87 hours from home.
The debris field might not be visible in the photos or videos (due to lighting) or might not have been there at the time those were taken. There were times when star sighting was possible, and accomplished, after the "explosion". See Section E (pg 21) of ...
Originally posted by FoosM
Due to debris from the explosion, the navigation system was unreliable.
Where is this debris in the photos or videos?
I'm not sure what your objection is.
Originally posted by FoosM
They did not even have power to gimbal the engine so we could begin an immediate return to Earth.
Ok, so...
To return the crew to Earth as quickly and safely as possible, only a single pass around the Moon was made, in what is called a free return trajectory, which uses the Moon's gravity to "slingshot" the spacecraft back to Earth. To enter this trajectory, a significant course correction was required. This would normally have been a simple procedure, using the SM propulsion engine, but the flight controllers did not know exactly how much damage the service module had taken and did not want to risk firing the main engine.
I thought they had no power for the engine anyway?
Originally posted by FoosM
The other question that I have is, how where they able to keep talking to each other if the power was cut?
How did the antenna work? And how come it didnt get damaged during the explosion?
Three fuel cells, two oxygen tanks, and two hydrogen tanks are located in Sector 4. The damaged area is located above the S-band high gain antenna.
Originally posted by FoosM
How did they maintain the 5psi if their oxygen tanks ruptured and their power was cut?
What kept that pressure up?
It speaks for itself, I think. Once again, FoosM reflexively responds a question with another question about some insignificant technical nuance, while carefully avoiding making any definitive statement. Except in this case, the technical nuance is reality itself.
Originally posted by FoosM
You silly goose.
Define what you mean by "real".
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Also, when the "explosion" occured, did the Astronauts feel or hear that it happened? If they didnt, why not?
55:56:10 - Haise: "Okay. Right now, Houston, the voltage is --
is looking good. And we had a pretty large bang associated
with the caution and warning there. And as I recall, main B
was the one that had an amp spike on it once before.
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
Good thing you put the word "explosion" in quotes. If you read the transcription of the voice and telemetry, it is clear that what happened was a rupture that led to loss of pressure, not an "explosion." I know, now you're going to cite all the secondary sources that use the word "explosion." .
"...The Apollo 13 malfunction was caused by an explosion and rupture of oxygen tank no. 2 in the service module. The explosion ruptured a line or damaged a valve in the no. 1 oxygen tank, causing it to lose oxygen rapidly. The service module bay no.4 cover was blown off. All oxygen stores were lost within about 3 hours, along with loss of water, electrical power, and use of the propulsion system.
"...The Apollo 13 malfunction was caused by [a bang] and rupture of oxygen tank no. 2 in the service module. The [bang] ruptured a line or damaged a valve in the no. 1 oxygen tank, causing it to lose oxygen rapidly. The service module bay no.4 cover was blown off. All oxygen stores were lost within about 3 hours, along with loss of water, electrical power, and use of the propulsion system.
56 hours into the mission, at about 03:06 UT on 14 April 1970 (10:06 PM, April 13 EST), the power fans were turned on within the tank. The exposed fan wires shorted and the teflon insulation caught fire. This fire spread along the wires to the electrical conduit in the side of the tank, which weakened and ruptured under the nominal 1000 psi pressure within the tank, causing the no. 2 oxygen tank to [bang]. This damaged the no. 1 tank and parts of the interior of the service module and blew off the bay no. 4 cover. ..."
Originally posted by FoosM
Lets take a look at some ruptures and loud bangs relating to oxygen tanks.
Remember, most of these are very small tanks under less pressure in relation to Apollo 13:
what happen if you cut the valve of your scuba tank....but this test's are made with 300bar tanks!!
Originally posted by 000063
It speaks for itself, I think.
Originally posted by FoosM
You silly goose.
Define what you mean by "real".
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
Originally posted by FoosM
How did they maintain the 5psi if their oxygen tanks ruptured and their power was cut?
What kept that pressure up?
Why should the cabin pressure have dropped ? It's not like the CM cabin was ruptured. Just the supply tanks to it. At this point I feel the need to reiterate my prior point re: how some people don't understand things like valves.
Wasnt oxygen cycled ?
The oxygen tanks supplied the fuel cells and environmental systems. They were not used as part of the propulsion system.
Originally posted by DJW001
Was the oxygen tank that blew out for life support or oxidizer?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Wasnt oxygen cycled ?
Was the oxygen tank that blew out for life support or oxidizer?
(You're not the only one who can answer a question with a question.)
Oh, and are you claiming that the microgravity scenes were shot in LEO?
edit on 11-8-2011 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
Originally posted by FoosM
How did they maintain the 5psi if their oxygen tanks ruptured and their power was cut?
What kept that pressure up?
Why should the cabin pressure have dropped ? It's not like the CM cabin was ruptured. Just the supply tanks to it. At this point I feel the need to reiterate my prior point re: how some people don't understand things like valves.
Wasnt oxygen cycled ?
The LM 'lifeboat' procedure had actually been created during a training simulation in the simulator not long before the flight of Apollo 13.
A Year Earlier, in the run-up to the Apollo 10 mission, the flight controllers and astronauts had been thrown a curveball during a simulation. "The simulation guys failed those fuel cells at almost the same spot," as when Apollo 13's oxygen tank exploded in real life, remembers James ("Jim") Hannigan, the lunar module branch chief, "It was uncanny." Legler had been present for the Apollo 10 simulation when the lunar module was suddenly in demand as a lifeboat. While some lifeboat procedures had already been worked out for earlier missions, none addressed having to use the lunar module as a lifeboat with a damaged command module attached. Although Legler called in reinforcements from among the other lunar module flight controllers, they were unable to get the spacecraft powered up in time, and the Apollo 10 simulation had finished with a dead crew.
"Many people had discussed the use of the LM as lifeboat, but we found out in this sim," that exactly how to do it couldn't be worked out in real time, Legler says. At the time, the simulation was rejected as unrealistic, and it was soon forgotten by most. NASA "didn't consider that an authentic failure case," because it involved the simultaneous failure of so many systems, explains Hannigan.
But the simulation nagged at the lunar module controllers. They had been caught unprepared and a crew had died, albeit only virtually. "You lose a crew, even in a simulation, and it's doom," says Hannigan. He tasked his deputy, Donald Puddy, to form a team to come up with a set of lifeboat procedures that would work, even with a crippled command module in the mix.
Liebergot's wingmen that day were Dick Brown, a power-systems specialist, and George Bliss and Larry Sheaks, both life support specialists. As the pressure rapidly rose in oxygen tank two and then abruptly fell within seconds, their eyes were fixed on the other cryogenic tank readouts, and they all missed the signs that tank two had just exploded.