reply to post by discl0sur3
Crap yet again...
Please note that I am not attacking the OP, just the video itself.
This video, by someone, is no legit source of any kind.
The woman "reporter" says the crash was "alledged".
What the hell is that supposed to mean? The crash itself isn't 100% proven now either?
It is said that it was "pistol shots" being heard. Are they sure it was a pistol? No, of course they aren't. Ít's just a blind assumption like
the rest of the story.
It is also claimed that the shooting was done by death squads who "was killing all witnessess to the crash". Again; what the hell? No witnessess?
Were they trying to cover up the crash itself? Well, mission failed
in that case, the crash made international news!
The cause of the accident was fog. And the reason for the plane hitting the trees was just like she says in the video; it was only 1km from the
landing ground, that means they flew pretty damn low since they were about to land within seconds
No matter how sensetive or hi-tech you equipment is, you still need to land the plane by hand and fog can be a really big problem.
Do yourself a favour; research how many times (in modern days) that state of the art airliner have gone down due to foggy conditions. It's a pretty
common reason for accidents...
I'm no pilot, but there are several here at ATS who can go in deeper on this (I'll try to fetch weedwhacker...)
She also claims that "there are no bodies or personal belongings" to be seen in the video.
Well, frankly, I have a hard time seeing anything in that video since it's recorded with out-dated VGA-graphics and probably downgraded through the
YouTube upload process as well. Her statement on that issue means nothing
Speaking Russian over the radio?
air traffic control worldwide
I might be wrong, but...nah, I don't think so.
Air traffic control is always in english. The option is hard to imagine. Planes would crash all the time otherwise.
The "kidnap conspiracy" is just thinking. Nothing speaks for this to have happened. They might as well be taken to a paralell dimension through a
wormhole found in Angela Merkel's butt...
The reporters source for these ideas is "people on forums". So, you have a discussion in a forum, where your source is a video with a report who
takes its soruces from forums...the idiot circle is complete...
When people in the street are being interviewed, they clearly oppose the idea that this is part of a conspiracy and that the crash was not an
The frist person to be asked (woman) even seems very offended by the question. The other one (guy) calls it by its proper name: "crazy ideas".
The official report hasn't come yet because sorting out a plane crash takes alot of time
And to sum it all up with a major facepalm that echoes throughout the world; when the "reporter" lady starts talking about Polish economics (totally
off topic) she says "I think"
about some of the numbers...
"I think"??? Veeery proffessional there lady...
To think I would believe in this...it's actually pretty insulting to be honest.
Two thumbs down