The Sky Was Black On The Moon?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:19 AM by ppk55
mmm so these highly skilled astronauts couldn't even take the visor off for a second to look at the stars ? ... oh wait ... they did.

But in this case Armstrong wasn't looking at harmless starlight .. he was looking down at the brightly lit moon with it's 'damaging rays'.

www.redicecreations.com...

>>'Armstrong raised his outer visor, the gold reflective visor that normally obscures an astronaut's face,' explained Mr Chaikin.
'Right after he collects the sample, he turns towards the lunar module and it's at that time that time, as he's standing there, that we can see his face inside the helmet. >>

Originally posted by Apex Predator
Also, please remember that the astronauts on the moon were wearing giant visors coated in gold, yes, gold! These visors were made with the intent of filtering out the extreme brightness and damaging rays of direct sunlight that was unfiltered by an atmosphere.

I seriously doubt they took off their helmets just for a bit of stargazing.[edit on 20-4-2010 by Apex Predator]



reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:27 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by ppk55



That's a very interesting article. Thanks for sharing. Here's the news linked in that site News.

I wonder why they didn't release that before?

It seems more and more interesting now.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:35 AM by ShadowArcher
reply to post by MR BOB



reply to post by Korg Trinity



I think what MR BOB may be thinking of is the need for light to bounce off an object in order for that object to be seen. For example, if the light from the light bulb above my head goes straight into my eyes, I can just see light; but the light from the bulb bouncing off my water bottle and then into my eyes allows me to see said water bottle.

Is this along the lines of what you are thinking? Could you be getting this confused with the star-atmosphere thing? In this case, since the stars are the things emitting the light, that light need only go into your eyes for you to see them, not bounce.

Sorry if I'm way off - I'll stay out of it!


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:42 AM by -PLB-
reply to post by Korg Trinity




Why would you spent your limited time on the moon looking at something you can already see from earth?


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:48 AM by ShadowArcher
reply to post by -PLB-



Because you are looking at them from another world. Another world where, in theory, you should be able to see them far clearer. Just a guess...


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:48 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by -PLB-



They could have played golf all day long at any time on Earth. So why were they playing golf on the moon?


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 10:23 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to
post by Korg Trinity




Why would you spent your limited time on the moon looking at something you can already see from earth?


Just because everything no matter what you do is a first on another world... (moon)...

What you are suggesting is that the stars are so mundane that you wouldn't attempt to see them???

Its human nature to think I wonder what this will be like, when entering a new situation...

So I find it very odd that they didn't think I wonder what the stars will be like from the moon...

I personally think looking up would be one of the first things to do because out there is surely where the next step would be...

Also to look into the abyss.... Ever walked close to the edge of cliff? Have you felt the almost irresistible urge to look over the side??

Looking out into space from the moon would surely draw the same kind of irresistible feeling..??

Korg.



reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 10:26 AM by ppk55
Ok then ... why did they say this at the press conference then..

www.youtube.com...

Also, apologies deaf alien if this is a little off topic, but what the hell are these 'optics' they talk about in the youtube clip.
Are they referring to the view finder of the camera ? because if that's the case .. oops, they didn't have one. They were chest mounted, fixed hasselblad cameras. Wow, if only I could take such great pics without a viewfinder.

Originally posted by DJW001
Stars were seen, however, when the conditions were right and the crew was dark adapted.




[edit on 20-4-2010 by ppk55]

[edit on 20-4-2010 by ppk55]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 10:29 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by ppk55



I wish I could give you more stars but alas I can only give you one big fat star.

It's just not possible that they couldn't see any star.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 10:36 AM by -PLB-
reply to post by Korg Trinity



We don't really know what action they undertook to see the stars. Maybe they tried but didn't get a good view and gave up. Even if they had not tried I would not find it odd. Maybe they were even briefed that the stars would be hard to see because of the bright light.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 10:38 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by ppk55
Ok then ... why did they say this at the press conference then..

www.youtube.com...


Originally posted by DJW001
Stars were seen, however, when the conditions were right and the crew was dark adapted.




The way they turned around and looked at each other when the question was raised... it was almost shock that they realised they didn't see any stars....

Body language says it all.... Their reactions don’t add up.

This is not someone remembering what surely would be the most exhilarating experience any human has had the chance to do...

This type of reaction and behaviour is very much like someone in a muddle reciting what was told to them.... They are acting like they are in a daze....

I say they were either hypnotised into believing or totally brainwashed.

Korg.

[edit on 20-4-2010 by Korg Trinity]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^