The Sky Was Black On The Moon?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:26 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Originally posted by jazz10
you wont see stars because they erase them, probably due to not been able to determine stars or ufo`s or possibly they dont want us to see the rubbish and space junk thats up there courtesy of humans.


Well yeah. But this is not the photos.

This is the astronauts themselves stating that the sky was "pitch black". They only could see the sun and the earth.

How is that even possible?


I would like to stick my orr in here.

You are actually 100% correct. Even with the brightness of the sun on the surface of the moon, the stars should be visible to an observer.

It is true that photographs may not be able to take images of the surface of the moon and the sky and pick up stars... this is due to the filters needed to reduce washout.

However....

If a photograph should be taken of the sky with the sun at the photographers back and the camera pointed at the sky so no ground was visible then indeed it would have been possible to take images of the stars...

Following this train of thought and it is logical to state that if an observer were to do the same thier eyes would be able to see stars very clearly.

My personal view is that the Apollo astronaughts were among the first to be successfully brainwashed and hypnotised into believing the story they were told about being on the moon.

Whether we did or we didn't go to the moon is a debate that is endless; however it is very clear to me at least that the Apollo missions were faked.

All the best,

Korg.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:36 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by MR BOB
reply to
post by Korg Trinity



If im wrong im wrong why should I be embaressed. we cant all be experts at everything.

please explain to me in detail why i am wrong.

i would like to be corrected.


[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]


You are wrong because light as any other form of electromagnetic waves do not require a medium to travel.

Light is not kinetic like sound and does not require a medium to travel through.

And you should be embarrased because this knowledge is so basic that even a child should know.

If what you suggest was correct then how you do think the light would travel from the stars in the first place, did you think inter galactic space has an atmosphere????

The reason you or anyone else can see the stars is the photons that left the stars millions of years ago reached you and entered your iris to be picked up by your retina and then interpreted by your visual cortex as an image....

Korg.


[edit on 20-4-2010 by Korg Trinity]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:44 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by PsykoOps




Seriously this again. It's the same reason you can't take photos of stars during daytime. You must realize that they were in daylight. If you think it's so simple as to keep your camera on the shadow then feel free to go outside and take pictures of stars during daytime. You can see stars on earth during daytime but you will need to be in a well or some such thing.


A daylight on moon is the same as a daylight on Earth?


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:49 AM by MR BOB
reply to post by Korg Trinity



is that how you interpreted what i said?

no no no. that's not what I had written.

yes i know light travels on its own.

but you cant see it unless it bounces off something./hits something



Like how you can see the blackness next to the sun, instead of just seeing light. rays going side ways.

this light is travelling thousands of miles. but it will not illuminate everything.

im not sure if im making myself clear still.

[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:55 AM by PsykoOps
reply to post by Deaf Alien



Yeah pretty much. The athmosphere makes pretty much no difference.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:57 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by MR BOB
reply to
post by Korg Trinity



is that how you interpreted what i said?

no no no. that's not what I had written.

yes i know light travels on its own.

but you cant see it unless it bounces off something./hits something



Like how you can see the blackness next to the sun, instead of just seeing light. rays going side ways.

this light is travelling thousands of miles. but it will not illuminate everything.

im not sure if im making myself clear still.

[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]


Hmmmm I think your stretching...

The light actually goes in through your iris and it hits your retina... This is how we See...

There is no illumination in the image around the sun because the light source is the sun and you are seeing that... If there were an object over there in the blackness you can see that object because the sun has illuminated it... the light has bounced off the surface of the object to reach your iris....

Can you see where you are going wrong?

Incidentally there is a big rush on at the moment to create the blackest black... you see true black can absorb the energy of light as apposed to reflecting it...

If we can create a truly black black then we will have far greater potential to convert light into direct energy...

Peace Out,

Korg.


[edit on 20-4-2010 by Korg Trinity]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 08:57 AM by Apex Predator
Daylight on the Moon is much brighter than daylight on Earth precisely because of the fact that there is minimal atmosphere on the moon. The rays of the Sun are not filtered and reflect back from the lunar surface without losing much intensity. Therefore, even if your back were to the Sun you would still be getting probably the same amount of light in your eyes as if you were walking through Oklahoma during the day on Earth. That is why even when the astronauts were standing in the shadow of the lunar module you could still see them perfectly lit in the pictures.

Also, please remember that the astronauts on the moon were wearing giant visors coated in gold, yes, gold! These visors were made with the intent of filtering out the extreme brightness and damaging rays of direct sunlight that was unfiltered by an atmosphere. If it can block the Sun I'm sure the infinitesimal (by comparison) light given off by stars "filtered" through billions of miles of space (which is not empty by the way) would be blocked out also. Maybe that had something to do with not being able to see stars on the moon regardless of the direction they faced. I seriously doubt they took off their helmets just for a bit of stargazing.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that it was probably a combination of 60's era technology and millenia old biology. Visors filtered a lot of available light and the Human eye can only withstand a certain brightness without experiencing a "washout", like walking into a dark room after being outside, in July, at noon, without cheap sunshades (or black sunglasses). Sorry about the ZZ Top reference, I couldn't help myself!



-- Apex

Edited to correct spelling errors

[edit on 20-4-2010 by Apex Predator]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:04 AM by MR BOB
reply to post by Korg Trinity



"The light actually goes in through your iris and it hits your retina... This is how we See... "

I already knew this, didn't think I needed 2 bring it up.

"If there were an object over there in the blackness you can see that object because the sun has illuminated it... the light has bounced of the surface of the object to reach your iris...."

thats what i was trying to say.

im awful at explaining things. i know what i mean in my mind, it seems to make sense when i type it lol.

I was trying to say in my OP, that the distant starlight is reflected in our atmosphere, to help see the stars better.

So i thought, no atmosphere= no stars light. (execpt our suns, bouncing off the moons surface)

But what is there for the distant starlight to bounce off on the moon to our eyes? the surface?
i though our eyes would not be enough to pick em up without atmosphere.








[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]

[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]

[edit on 20-4-2010 by MR BOB]


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:12 AM by DJW001
reply to post by Deaf Alien



They could see the Earth, the nearest planet. Theoretically, they could probably see the planets if they shaded their eyes from the glare and knew where to look. Pity that apparently none of them thought to do this.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^