Originally posted by -Blackout-
I ran upon this website and these theories/facts within this link below. Its some interesting stuff.
First and foremost...
A new term has been developed "theories/facts".... What is that??
Now, moving to the article mentioned.
The author is clearly in denyal.
First let´s see who he is:
""Anthony Lawson is a retired international-prize-winning commercials director, cameraman, ad-agency creative director and voice over. He used to be
known for shooting humorous commercials.""
Let´s note that:
He is neither a structural engineer, physicist, expert on demolition or explosives, nor military expert, or aviation expert.
Very significant quote:
""After recovering from the shock of seeing the Twin Towers collapse, on subsequent showings, I developed a strong feeling that what I was seeing
and what I was being told were quite different things.""
Simply put.- DENIAL.
Now let´s do some "debunking" shall we??
He says that:
""The 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to
positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on Sept, 11, 2001.""
Well. He lies here because the aircraft involved in the 9/11 attacks were identified, positively. The matter of aircraft identification was never in
doubt. There´s a huge amount of information about this.
And we must also note:
After the total ground stop was ordered, only 4 pax. planes were not accounted for:
AA11, AA77, UA175 and UA93.
So. Through that simple bit of information, the problem of identity is solved.
""There is absolutely nothing which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11 crash sites.""
This is such a big LIE.
There is HUGE amounts of evidence of the identity of the flights, plus debris, eyewitnesses, DNA identification of remains, etc.
Another jewel by Mr. Lawson:
""However the NTSB has confirmed that—apparently for the first time from its inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000
other aviation accidents—it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes which occurred on September 11, 2001.""
Now. The ones who have read through this thread know by now that this is false. It´s been explained (debunked).
The NTSB did work "with the FBI" assisting on the investigation.
A little more:
""The FBI, backed up by a separate letter from the Justice Department has refused to release any information, under the Freedom of Information Act,
about any debris recovered from the crash sites.""
Could this have anything to do with national security, or with an "ongoing investigation"?? And what does he mean by "any information"??
The fact is LOTS OF INFORMATION is publicly available from all the crash sites!!!
""It may be recalled that a transcript taken from this recorder formed the basis for several TV dramas and one Academy-Award winning feature
Mr. Lawson was very close to the truth. However, he missed the only point that was directly involved with his profession. Minor thing, but still
caught my attention. United 93 was nominated, but didn´t win.
So, basically and sadly, what Mr. Lawson shows us is denyal, and also that he has fallen under the "truther movement" spell.
Denial is a normal defense mechanism. But takes away our objectivity.
My 2 cts.
[edit on 19-4-2010 by rush969]