It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FortAnthem
reply to post by Matthew Dark
Well that sucks.
Originally posted by Nventual
You don't need to steal an item from the actual person for it to be theft. If you have an item that isn't yours then it isn't yours, it's pretty obvious, it doesn't matter how you got it.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by muzzleflash
No, it's not.
I would've thought it was theirs outright, but according to the laws here in the States, it still rightfully belongs to the husband who stashed it.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by muzzleflash
No, it's not.
I would've thought it was theirs outright, but according to the laws here in the States, it still rightfully belongs to the husband who stashed it.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by muzzleflash
Okay, first, your pepsi line is not even comparable to the actual case.
Second, the guy who stashed the money did not give the item away, his wife did, and did so without his consent or knowing.
It's still his money. Period.
Just let this one go, man.
Originally posted by Horza
reply to post by FortAnthem
You give the money back because it's the right thing to do.
End of story.
Originally posted by FortAnthem
Do you at least agree with us that this law SUCKS?
What ever happened to finders keepers- losers weepers?
THAT should be the law in this case.
Originally posted by Horza
reply to post by FortAnthem
You give the money back because it's the right thing to do.
End of story.
Originally posted by Horza
reply to post by FortAnthem
You give the money back because it's the right thing to do.
End of story.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
Well yeah, but I can see both sides to the issue.
That's why I asked my super smart sexy law school girlfriend to weigh in on it, and she gave me the law right from the books.
The owner never gave away or lost or misplaced the money, he has full rights to recover it. If he donated the suitcase, it would be a completely different story.
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
reply to post by muzzleflash
Dude, you're reaching now just because you don't feel like being wrong.
This isn't about my opinion, I just stated the law as it appears in the actual law books and how it would be viewed by a court.
It's not about "ifs, ands or buts", it's about clearly defined law.