reply to post by Matrix Rising
I think for the most part we are talking of the same thing here...
I'm GUESSING that what we might call the soul is an "aspect" of a Super intelligence, because in an infinite Universe and Evolution -- it's a
pretty sure bet that one would arise. We could suppose that after everything had been thought about and mastered, "sampling" reality would be the
one great thing left.
I'd say that there is more than one super-intelligence, at least from our perspective. The"splintering off" of a watcher is likely, but I suspect
that the "newly super-evolved" intelligences, would have awareness of themselves at the same time having "subroutines" that lived, that were NOT
aware of the greater whole.
I would think that they would have preferences -- and that the intelligence that MIGHT effect the world, or offer information, would gravitate towards
people with minds, or thought processes it liked. There might be a lot of lives that would bore the heck out of an intelligent being.
So, the "godlike" would be part of everything -- even the ant and slug, and experience it all even if life is misery -- and the "aware" or
ascended intelligences, would probably have preferences. I think that's why some people seem to be "all there" and other people seem to be "stand
ins from central casting." I'm not sure if everybody really has a soul in the sense that they have memories of themselves after death -- the
Universe seems more into recycling.
>>> Your point about;
Decoherence makes a choice we measure seem like the real or rational choice because after a choice is made it's thermodynamically
> I think that's kind of the traditional Physics perspective.
I'm proposing something a bit simpler -- but everything I'm trying to propose, is ideas that I think can be proven and disproven -- I find it
annoying to have people just say "you have seven bodies and this one is the third" -- yeah, why is that?
I think it is provable that our Universe is rational -- and NOT just because we are "fitting facts" to the history. There is not YET an accepted
theory why Physics laws HAVE to be obeyed -- and my proposed idea, is that "they do not" -- only, all those un-taken choices, or negative and
positive charges that are not balanced cease to exist.
Entropy happens at an atomic level in particles themselves -- the particles you are made of are different in the future than the are now. But there is
no past and there is no future -- and I think I can come up with a few tests to prove that.
Anyway, interesting stuff. have a great weekend.