It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tooo many pills
reply to post by jackflap
The war in Afghanistan was justified if that is where the terrorist were harbored to train, and if the Islamic extremists were the ones that pulled off 9/11. But it seems like after Afghanistan, we just saw how much of a hell hole the whole Middle East was and decided to just wipe Iraq and eventually Iran clean to let them start over a fresh with our puppet governments in place.
Why doesn't Saudi Arabia ever say anything?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
First. The US invaded Iraq in 2003.
Second. The Iraqi biological and chemical weapons were provided BY THE USA.
Third. It is a well known fact that Iran and Syria have biological and chemical weapons.
Fourth. Barry Soetoro and Israel are accusing Iran of developing NUKES not biological and chemical weapons.
And Iraq used their chemical weapons on Kurds and IRAN. Iran didn't strike back with those kinds of weapons even if they could because they were not as barbaric as Saddam.
The fact is : Iran with nukes ain't a threat. Mao had nukes, Stalin had nukes, Kim Jong Il has nukes... and they were far more crazier than the mullahs, still they did not use them... Iran wouldn't use them unless Iran would be invaded. Don't screw with them they won't use them if they even develop them.
And all of this is because of Bush in the first place. Because of his 2003 speech on the axis of evil where he branded Iran as a terrorist state when IN FACT Iran was helping capturing the Taliban scum in Afghanistan.
Iran would be our ally right now if it wasn't for that piece of crap Bushtard.
[edit on 2-4-2010 by Vitchilo]
Third, it was Obama himself that said "Iran must not get nukes". Back then he saw Iran with nukes AS A THREAT. Even John McCain agreed with this. It was a campaigning point.
Originally posted by TheCoffinman
reply to post by whoshotJR
actually Iran is much bigger than Iraq and Iran has a more developed armed forces. unlike iraq, iran isnt being crippled by sanctions, they have friends (russia, china, venezuela, etc.) Iran would be much more difficult than iraq ever was...
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by sos37
Anyway who cares, the whole Bush administration was saying that Iraq could bomb the US, had links with Al-CIADA and 9/11 and that they were developing nukes. All of that was false.
The day before yesterday a correspondent of Israel’s popular Channel 2 called me and asked, in a shocked voice: “Is it true that you have given an interview to the Iranian news agency?
“That’s true,” I told her. The agency mailed me some questions about the political situation, and I answered.
“Why did you do this?” she asked/accused.
“Why not?” I replied. That was the end of the conversation.
And indeed, why not?