It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by warisover
reply to post by skunknuts
This theory does not discredit the entire truther movement. We are all looking to get to the bottom of this crime that we know was carried out by the Bush administration and others. A real investigation would show that there were NO PLANES used in the attacks. Please use your common sense.
You are asking others to use common sense and yet here are you are...clearly lacking in common sense yourself. You claim the videos are fake. What we saw on TV was fake. I can accept that to a point. Your argument however totally falls apart when you take into account the hundreds of home videos from that day that clearly show planes hitting the towers. You fail to take into account the thousands of eye witnesses in New York who saw with their own two eyes, planes hit the towers. Instead, you cherry pick eyewitnesses. You pick the few who say they saw an explosion but not the actual plane impact and use it to build this whole nonsense theory.
Right, I guess you'd rather live in a fantasy world like 9/11 where you don't have to confront the evidence, where passports and drivers licenses can survive infernos that melt and vaporize steel, office fires can cause steel skyscrapers to free-fall into their footprints, boeings can vanish and burrow themselves 25ft underground, amateur witnesses are psychics with more initial knowledge than engineers did months in advance, and where the laws of physics don't apply
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
the NAUDET footage which has IRREFUTABLE evidence of fakery and tampering via the obvious edits for starters.
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
So yeah, you might very well win every time. But the win whether you or he won, in actuality proves or disproves nothing unless ALL the evidence can be presented in full context and without restrictions.
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
Can you show proof from a professional video analysis that the CNN video is REAL?
Can you prove to me, without a shadow of doubt, that you are not being paid to advance these no-plane theories by the CIA?
I doubt it.
if you set up a paypal account and make it worth my time I will. Lol
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Right, I guess you'd rather live in a fantasy world like 9/11 where you don't have to confront the evidence, where passports and drivers licenses can survive infernos that melt and vaporize steel, office fires can cause steel skyscrapers to free-fall into their footprints, boeings can vanish and burrow themselves 25ft underground, amateur witnesses are psychics with more initial knowledge than engineers did months in advance, and where the laws of physics don't apply
And this is why its useless to hae a discussion with you. You believe that steel vaporized it didnt.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
You dont believe that things like passports and driver's licenses will survive, when items like that survive EVERY airliner crash (that happens on dry land..else some fool will ask about water crashes)
Originally posted by vipertech0596
You believe it was just office fires that fell the buildings...
Originally posted by vipertech0596
.when it was the fires, combined with the damage they suffered.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
You think that boeings vanished,
Originally posted by vipertech0596
when in reality all four of the jets that day left plenty of wreckage.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
You also dont believe an airliner at high speed couldnt burrow its way into the earth of an closed strip mine. Then you rely on your limited views of science.......
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Like I said, I will stick with reality. Say hi to Alice for me though.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
the NAUDET footage which has IRREFUTABLE evidence of fakery and tampering via the obvious edits for starters.
ATS member mister.old.school did something that not a single no-planer has done to prove their point: he purchased a high-definition copy of the Naudet footage and thoroughly ripped apart your arguments. His thread can be found here.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You won't find any no-planer that will spend their own money to obtain original copies because it would debunk their own claims.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
On the other hand, you keep claiming "evidence" this and "IRREFUTABLE evidence" that, but what you aren't doing is posting any of this "irrefutable evidence" that you have repeatedly been asked to post. That's called dodging.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You've typed pages of text that wastes bandwidth and forum space, but you haven't posted one single piece of "irrefutable evidence".
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
People have to ask themselves why you won't post any evidence when continuously asked. The only conclusion one can come up with is:
You don't have any "evidence" to post!
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by truthseekr1111
So yeah, you might very well win every time. But the win whether you or he won, in actuality proves or disproves nothing unless ALL the evidence can be presented in full context and without restrictions.
Thank you for conceding that you have no real evidence and that I would win every time. If you don't have enough real evidence, and can't present it in the moderated and time-allotted way that is required in the debate forum, then:
You don't have any "evidence" to post!
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
All you're doing is using excuses to explain why you or any other no-planer won't debate me in a moderated forum. You have no convincing evidence to remotely prove your case and thus you admit that I would win every time.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
And this is what happens when people are caught spreading disinformation. When asked to prove their disinformation, they type pages and pages of text without providing any evidence to prove their claims.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Then when asked to debate in a moderated forum, all you get is excuses about why it's automatically set up to prove the no-planes disinformation is wrong.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
There's really nothing else to say here. Your deliberated dodging of posting "irrefutable evidence" and making up excuses about why you can't or won't debate, proves that the video fakery/no-planes "theories" are, in fact, disinformation with no provable, verifiable basis of evidence.
We're done here.
edit on 2-2-2011 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RedSongbird777
Dont worry these no plane threads are moving to the HOAX area and are not welcomed by ATS.
***********************************************************
Good to know,The No plane belongs in the Hoax bin.
Originally posted by RedSongbird777
I do not buy into the whole 9/11 conspiracy theories either;
Originally posted by RedSongbird777
however I understand people have their opinions/ ideas.
Originally posted by RedSongbird777
Having said that; to say planes did not hit the WTC buildings at all is downright ridiculous
Originally posted by RedSongbird777
and somewhat insulting to those ( myself included) who did witness it firsthand.edit on 21-3-2011 by RedSongbird777 because: typo
I opened a thread that used the available images of the damage to the North Tower to explain that planes couldn't cause the damage, and further explained what could have caused it.
My thread was moved to the HOAX section by the admins who proclaimed all No Plane threads are considered hoaxes...so imagine my surprise to find this one.