It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
Well, considering every economist on the face of the planet agrees with me, I'll stick to my opinion.
Free trade is one area where Keynesians, the Chicago school, and the Austrians all agree, it improves the lives of everyone involved.
If you are looking for someone to blame for the current economic mess, you should be pointing the finger at the federal reserve system and our criminal government, not free trade.
[edit on 10-3-2010 by mnemeth1]
The essay on Free Trade at The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics looks at the issue of international trade policy. In the essay, Alan Blinder states that "one study estimated that in 1984 U.S. consumers paid $42,000 annually for each textile job that was preserved by import quotas, a sum that greatly exceeded the average earnings of a textile worker. That same study estimated that restricting foreign imports cost $105,000 annually for each automobile worker's job that was saved, $420,000 for each job in TV manufacturing, and $750,000 for every job saved in the steel industry."
In the year 2000 President Bush raised tariffs on imported steel goods between 8 and 30 percent. The Mackinac Center for Public Policy cites a study which indicates that the tariff will reduce U.S. national income by between 0.5 to 1.4 billion dollars. The study estimates that less than 10,000 jobs in the steel industry will be saved by the measure at a cost of over $400,000 per job saved. For every job saved by this measure, 8 will be lost.
The cost of protecting these jobs is not unique to the steel industry or to the United States. The National Center For Policy Analysis estimates that in 1994 tariffs cost the U.S. economy 32.3 billion dollars or $170,000 for every job saved. Tariffs in Europe cost European consumers $70,000 per job saved while Japanese consumers lost $600,000 per job saved through Japanese tariffs.
Unfortunately, there is another possibility. If the Federal Reserve creates hundreds of billions in new dollars out of thin air, and the foreign “investors” are other central banks that gobble up the dollars because their own rules treat them as reserves, then this increase in the foreign demand for “American assets” is of a much-different character.
In particular, the low US interest rates that accompany such a gusher of new dollars will encourage domestic consumption and will discourage foreigners in the private sector from investing in the United States. The rest of the world will acquire American assets all right, but they will be more heavily tilted toward debt (rather than equity in growing companies). The physical goods flowing into the United States will be consumer goods such as TVs and iPods.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by mnemeth1
Unfortunately almost every economist who preaches about the free market is an out-right Marxist, because the whole free market concept is nothing but Marxism.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by concernedcitizan
It is not the socialization of industry, but the allowance of industry to control governments that is destroying our economy and eroding our rights.
First of all, these massive failures of various industries came during a time when government regulation was minimal at best under the GW regime which consistently ignored rampant white collar crime. It was only after the financial crisis was created due to corrupt business practices, due to the governments failure to enforce laws against what should have been criminal activity, that government bailouts began.
Stop blaming government for the failures of business.
Time to end the denial and admit that these failed businesses are responsible for their own failures.
It is not the socialization of industry, but the allowance of industry to control governments that is destroying our economy and eroding our rights.
Stop blaming government for the failures of business.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by mnemeth1
Really, please do give us a list of all those highly successful free market economies out there in the world.
You claim the free market system is the natural function of markets, then there should be several examples of these naturally functioning, efficient market systems.