Experiment could prove The Theory of General Relativity wrong..., page 1

Experiment could prove The Theory of General Relativity wrong...

refreshingnews9.blogspot.com

According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, a moving mass should create another field, called gravitomagnetic field, besides its static gravitational field. This field has now been measured for the first time and to the scientists' astonishment, it proved to be no less than one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein's General Relativity predicts.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
suzuki-t.hp.infoseek.co.jp

The article expands on the incredible size of the gravitomagnetic field, and the possibility of merging General Relativity with Quantum or String Theory.
It seems the experiment is implying that when an object is put into motion it will actually produce more of the field than should be feasibly possible for its mass.

Is it just me or could this potentially be the source of so many of these alternative energy devices we've heard about over the years?
Even if this is not the case the possibilities of merging multiply fields of physics is exciting, if could mean another major perceptional shift such as when Einstein first developed the General Theory of Relativity.

Hopefully if we are due for another breakthrough we won't make a weapon out of it....I know I am a dreamer.

Included with the article is the original experiment's report. Straight from the horse's mouth... as it were.


refreshingnews9.blogspot.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 26-2-2010 by Shark_Feeder]

[edit on 26-2-2010 by Shark_Feeder]

reply to post by Shark_Feeder

---

Very nice find.

S&F.

Day by day everything we know is changing. Star and Flag, I always enjoy these threads, thank you for sharing.

On a side note, I wonder if this is related to the claim of spinning objects becoming lighter.

It is also talked about and discussed here:

www.physicsforums.com...

When I took Modern Physics, the first analogy in the first 5 pages of the text book was mathematically wrong. It was a simple analogy comparing an observer of a boat race in a current. One boat goes across the stream and the other boat goes down stream and back up. According to their relativity math, the boat that goes across the stream and back will win every time, according to most common conceptions, they should tie because the net effective of the current is zero, but according to "real" math from an engineering standpoint, the one that goes across the stream will "waste" energy in both directions in order to maintain a straight path, or it will drift and its path will be longer, either way it always loses!

So, we know from engineering and real world scenarios that the very first simple analogy is wrong. From that analogy they developed several experiments and "proved" their theory.

www.upscale.utoronto.ca...

The most common apparatus is the spinning wheel.

I believe the spinning wheel is wrong, because it doesn't account for several forces acting on the system. It is contained to the sun and the orbit of the earth and the motion of the wheel, but . . . . . what about the rotation of the earth and the motion of the sun around the galaxy and the motion of the galaxy itself? The experiment relies on some very fine and technical measurements to draw a very large conclusion, and yet it ignores the largest parameters. The speed of the earth around the sun is negligible when compared to the speed of the earth around the galaxy?

Did the experimenters take into account the exact motion of the their apparatus at the exact time of the experiment? Their reference system at 9 am is entirely different than it is at 9 pm. Their latitude and longitude on the surface of the earth will affect their measurement, so one University cannot reproduce what another University does without taking that into account. The season, the moon phase, etc..

Our scientists are all too willing to trust their advanced instruments even when the guy paddling the boat is crying out that they are wrong!

reply to post by broli

---

I have always had the impression that the LHC is one of those experiments we will not get the whole story on for several decades. If they are working with ideas this promising and revolutionary it would explain the massive funding, and politically influence at play within CERN.

Man I am still coming up with both questions and possibilities because of this experiment.... I am in love with science, and what a nerd I can be.

Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 83 member flags

Google announces privacy settings change across products; users can\'t opt out
  Posted 16 days ago with 78 member flags

Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags

Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags

FDA\'s New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It"
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags

Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

BREAKING: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran\'s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC
  Posted 1 days ago with 48 member flags

Bill Gates Backs Climate Scientists Lobbying For Large-Scale Geoengineering
  Posted 3 days ago with 40 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: