Explosive News, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 94 times


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:00 AM by rainfall
Originally posted by moonwalk420
reply to
post by rainfall



i mean honestly how could a skyscraper fall in free fall when it wasnt even hit..thats odd it seems like it was scheduled to be hit but missed and the detonation went of as planned....



I know.......and to think there are STILL people posting here that are pretending that the OS is true.....


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:01 AM by seethelight
reply to post by rainfall



Of course they didn't fall in free fall... even your emoticon can see that.



reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:02 AM by Odessy
reply to post by seethelight


wow, your the one line king!
A king with one source! Linked more than once... I hope you don't get your info from one place only, because according to other sites the holocaust didn't exist either and they can debunk the whole thing... but luckily for me, I have that thing called... what is it? oh yeah, common sense!

I truly can not fathom what goes through the minds of the people that still believe the official reports with all the evidence stacked against them... Hope I hope, blind stinking hope that the world is a great place and the govt loves us to death.

I guess the 1000 professionals in the one field that knows about this stuff are all crazy! l






reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:09 AM by seethelight
reply to post by Odessy



You think it makes more sense typing a bunch of things like, "I really can't fathom that anyone... yada yada yada".

Why waste my time?

Until you show me how a building that's core collapsed at a slower rate then it's external walls and a building that's top obviously fell to one side is in free fall I don't need to show you multiple sources.

Though if you spent half as much time checking the link I provided as you do rabbiting on about people's stupidity, in comparison to you, you would realise that the link leads to a site that is FULL OF SOURCES.

But hey, you'd have to think for yourself to do that...


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:14 AM by seethelight
reply to post by Odessy



The WTCs were the only building ever build like the WTCs.

And guess what, they were both hit by planes and they both behaved in the same way.

If only one had fallen (which would make less sense IMO) what would you guys be saying?

They didn't fall in free fall, the amount of thermite taken would've been, literally, TONS, there was no time for conventional explosives to have been placed, in the 10s of thousands, as they would be in a controlled demo, etc. etc.



[edit on 24-2-2010 by seethelight]


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:20 AM by redgy
reply to post by rainfall



thats right, there is nothing to see here.
nothing with building 7 or why else it fell, all the blame lies with the terrorists on those planes and no-one else.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:29 AM by ancient_wisdom
reply to post by seethelight



yet WTC 7 was not hit by a plane, and you seem to be intentionally ignoring the fact that the thermite was nano thermite, meaning it would not take tons.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:32 AM by technical difficulties
Originally posted by seethelight
The Hudson Department Store Implosion:

In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives

www.controlled-demolition.com...


According to Loose Change, the security from WTC was ONLY DOWN FOR 5 DAYS PRIOR TO 9/11.

Explain how two buildings that were MUCH bigger could be rigged in much less time?

You can't.

So no free fall. No rigging the buildings in 5 days. No thermite.
t
It's almost like someone flew planes into them...
Well as you said before, WTC has a different design. All you would have to do is place explosives in certain places. And the hudson department was working with just explosives, not planes being used as missles, or raging fires for that matter.

[edit on 24-2-2010 by technical difficulties]

[edit on 24-2-2010 by technical difficulties]


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:37 AM by Solomons
reply to post by rainfall



People don't need to believe the OS is completely true to not believe the demolition theory. I probably lean in that direction, still don't believe one way or the other mind you. But this religious fanaticism that some people have in regards to that day completely ruins things for alot of people on the fence in terms of demolition theory.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 06:47 AM by ancient_wisdom
rather than arguing with all these deniers, why not just turn our attention to this video

www.youtube.com...

Total proof that bombs were planted in the buildings.

If you are so sure that the OS is true, why not make a video debunking "Total Proof..." and have it get 14,600,000 views (oh, while at the same time having youtube ban one of your accounts like what happened to NufffRespect.)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags