Explosive News, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 94 times


reply posted on 23-2-2010 @ 11:24 PM by Mr Sunchine
reply to post by rainfall




I think the tides are starting to turn...


I wouldn't bet on it.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 12:41 AM by TrueAmerican
Interesting that this is posted in the "Politics" section of the Washington Times.

Yeah, politics. This isn't treason now, this isn't mass murder now, this isn't evidence of an extremely serious crime now. this isn't terrorism now- this is POLITICS!

But aside from the WT putting this arguably in the wrong place- i.e., it should have been on the front page of every major news publication considering the gravity of all the evidence for CD- it still is good news that at least they are making more of the public aware.

I continually hear the argument from the debunkers that they don't want to see a single penny more go towards a new 9/11 investigation- because it would just be wasting our tax dollars. Yeah, uh huh... So instead, they'd rather never indict Bin Laden cause we don't have enough evidence, dissolve the unit looking for him, continue wasting our precious brother's lives in "necessary" wars over their own false version of the "evidence" that's just a high level lie to make their rich asskissers richer. Yeah great, debunkers, WAY TO GO!!!!!!!!!!!



He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in "pure free-fall acceleration." He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of "multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph" and the "mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking."


HE is particularly disturbed? How about you WT, aren't YOU disturbed?

Notice the spin injected into the article:

The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule.


How about instead you tell the friggin truth:

"The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers, which have rigorously been vetted by thousands of experts, cast extreme doubt on the government's story. There is enough evidence that the towers were destroyed by explosives to warrant a new investigation."

The mass media doesn't have the balls to report the truth when it comes to 9/11. Because yeah, it's a political issue now. I am sure the people who died (and continue to die "because" of 9/11) just love the fact that their lost lives are now mere politics.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 12:47 AM by ugie1028
reply to post by rainfall



as i said in other threads. lately they have just been coming and coming.

things may change soon.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 05:15 AM by seethelight
reply to post by rainfall



Moonie newspapers aren't the MSM...

Sorry, but this is still a bunch of nothing.


reply posted on 24-2-2010 @ 05:51 AM by moonwalk420
reply to post by rainfall



hopefully TPTB will soon be at their downfall..these repeated studies on controverial issues definietly pints out flaws in their story. i mean honestly how could a skyscraper fall in free fall when it wasnt even hit..thats odd it seems like it was scheduled to be hit but missed and the detonation went of as planned....
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 7 hours ago, 51 replies