Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
reply to post by seethelight
It was designed to be hit by a plane
though it was designed to be hit by a smaller plane, it was designed to withstand that plane multiple times. Either way it was still a jet liner, the
biggest at the time, that was in mind during construction. You probably never saw 911 mysteries.
Sorry, mate, but similar isn't good enough.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
I was hoping you'd at least say titanic, toyotas were recalled, not all failed, and the space shuttle blew up, just like WTC. Ice can sink the
titanic, but at least it hit something, unlike WTC 7.
You say that like it wasn't on fire for hours. It was. Explanations have been given; you just dont like them.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
The only explanation given for the collapse of WTC 7 is a structural fail at a key point, combined with damage from falling towers. However, it
collapsed seven hours later, in free fall speed. Don't you find this to be a bit odd?
Combined with the witnesses saying they heard explosives...
...and the explosives caught on film...
and the scientific paper on nano thermite. Some things can be coincidences, but not all things.
Sigh. You get a Lot wrong here.
First, it didn't collapse at free fall speeds. That's a lie you've chosen to believe. Was 9/11 odd? We'll, name another event like it in US
history? Name another time in the history of the world that two giant planes have been deliberately flown into two skyscrapers, within minutes of each
other.
Let's set up a control group before we start saying ANYTHING that happened after that is more odd than one might expect on a day like 9/11.
Second, witnesses saw a LOT of things on 9/11, including WT7 leaning. Which would be counter-indicative of a controlled explosion, or at least would
lead a LOT of credibility to the explanation that the structure was dramatically weakened.
Besides, how many people there on that day DON'T believe in the demo explanation. Are we having a count the witnesses contest? I bet I'd win that
one.
As for seeing explosives.. that didn't happen... adn if you wanna talk about HEARING explosions, go watch footage of an ACTUAL demo and see if you
think ANYONE would've missed that. It's a LOT different than a few randomly timed explosions, which is all that have been reported. Demos consist of
dozens and dozens of well timed and highly visible explosions.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
5 dancing israeli's were arrested on 9/11. whatreallyhappened.com... proof of possible mossad connection. To deny
it is even remotely possible is to cover up this fact.
Of course that whole story has been repeatedly debunked. If you gave even a toss about the truth you'd see that is a total lie.
Never happened.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
MSM ridicules honest questions, which is exactly why this OP thread is such big news, there is finally, after nine years, some, repeat, some light
being shed on this issue, and you naively assume the MSM is NOT in on the conspiracy? Who is the faither now?
A few things. The MSM isn't monolithic. Never has been. It's a ratings driven business. If there was ANYTHING AT ALL in this, someone would cover it
because it'd make a crapload of money.
Secondly, the Moonie Times is hardly the MSM.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
evil ones: Bill O'Reilly
Sean Hannity
Glenn Beck
Rush Limbaugh
(formerly) Tucker Carlson,
and Mark Davis,
We agree on that much at least.. though evil is just a joke word...
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
The problem is that while anyone can come to any conclusion about 9/11, the people who believe in the official story HAVE to agree with everything the
administration said at the time. Meaning they have to believe the Iraq war was good, Afghanistan is still justified, and essentially ignore every
single future terrorist attack such as Fort Hood and Underwear Bomber and deny the overwhelming witness testimony that shows a cover up or military
operation going on. You also have to agree that the TARP bail out was a good idea and that the economy is doing good. Doesn't it tire you to juggle
all of that nonsense at once? Why not just let it go?
Umm.. none of this makes sense. I don't agree that Iraq was a good idea... at all.. in fact none of what you're going on about in this bit makes
much sense.
Originally posted by ancient_wisdom
I know that ultimately I can never get the absolute truth about 9/11 or any historical event, yet you have to believe that you know exactly what
happened on 9/11, and that furthermore you know this because Bush knew this at the time, without any flaw, and now you still must carry the burden of
this belief. You sir belong to the ideological cult.
Uhh.. again, this is nonsense... complete BS.
If you knew me at all you'd know I'm a massive Liberal. I don't claim to know 100% about 9/11, but I do KNOW that you faithers have a LONG history
of believing in something and then fixing the evidence around your beliefs.
In your case you've posted debunked and inaccurate stuff and then decided to round it off by calling me a Bush supporter.
Just sad really.
We're politically similar to some degree, but I just flatly refuse to start spouting lies to further a political agenda or to bury my head in the
sand because I like the conclusion that allows me to reach.