General Petraeus’ address preempted by student protest, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 10-2-2010 @ 12:26 AM by higns07
reply to post by sos37



Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the General should be punished.

I have a question though. You believe that it is OUR responsibility to fight for the people of other countries? Man, I bet the founding fathers would have loved for someone else to start and fight our revolution.

In my opinion, if these people want to be free, they may fight for it. Our fathers were ready to give their life in order to perserve our freedoms. Are the people of Iran?


reply posted on 10-2-2010 @ 12:28 AM by AshOnMyTomatoes
Originally posted by sos37
To the OP and anyone else who says Petraeus should be hung:

You seriously make me sick. You are a prime example of ungratefulness if there ever was one. And the founding fathers would spit on you in shame if they could.

How do I know this? Because the kind of freedom that these protestors are using is exactly what Petraeus fought for overseas. THEIR RIGHT TO SPEAK FREELY AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT REPRISAL.

[edit on 10-2-2010 by sos37]
I'm perfectly well aware of how lucky I am to live in a free country. But again, I ask you:

What was going on in Iraq or Afghanistan that threatened my rights?

In anticipation of your answer, I'll say this. Terrorism is preventable. We have one of the most feared (or respected, depending on how you look at it) militaries and intelligence agencies in the world. Since 9/11, the only widely publicized terror attempt was the laughable Christmas guy. We do not live in constant fear of attacks (or we wouldn't, if the news would stop going on about them).

In fact, resentment towards America would decrease if we ended our meddling in the Middle East.

Now to our freedoms.

The largest single reduction to American rights was enacted in a very shady piece of legislation called the Patriot Act. It was, arguably, brought on by the need for increased security in the wake of 9/11 and the threat of further attacks.

But when it comes down to it, how is reducing our freedoms defending our freedoms?

So you tell me, specifically, what the wars overseas are doing to "preserver our freedoms." No patriotic diatribe, no vitriolic hatred of liberalism, just an actual answer.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^