Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by hooper
Well, first all you need to do is search THIS WEBSITE. There is an article on ATS about Flight 93 evidence and Iron Mountain facility.

Please show me any evidence that the flight 93 parts and debris are in Iron Mountain.

Well it is pretty obvious now that you really have no interest in the "truth" since you can't even be bothered to look something up on the very webiste that you are on. Pretty pathetic, actually.

The debris is not in Iron Mountain. You figure it out.

Originally posted by hooper
Well it is pretty obvious now that you really have no interest in the "truth" since you can't even be bothered to look something up on the very webiste that you are on. Pretty pathetic, actually.

Thanks again for showing you cannot post evidence.

So sad how i can post evidence but you cannot.



[edit on 17-2-2010 by REMISNE]

Originally posted by hooper

And why bother with photos?

Originally posted by hooper
Then why do you keep posting proof that you claim backs up that statement, unless of course, you think everyone you quote is wrong?

You seem to think there are all wrong too!

Yeah, those are real specific.

But what's still their common themes?

Those are not "reports". They are quotes from newspaper articles.

So the reporters, Ambassadors, and authors like Lisa Beamer are all just making the same # up?

How in the world did they ALL come to say the same thing, that most of the plane buried? Where did they ALL get that notion?

Just to play along, when was the plane found to be "mostly" buried? I mean that couldn't have been determined all at once, that had to be something that was concluded well into or well after the recovery process. It wouldn't be some "eureka" moment at the crash site. So what is your baseline for claiming that the press didn't report it?

They started digging between 9/13 and 9/16-17. At least by their last day of digging, they would have realized this.

So lets just say that they realized on their last day of digging (well just say 9/17 to be conservative), that most of UA93 had been buried underground, why didn't the media report on that day, or 9/18 that most of the plane had buried?

And why not on the previous days when the FBI would have started noticing the large amounts of wreckage being unearthed by them (9/13-9/16) that the media didn't start reporting about large amounts of UA93's wreckage was being unearthed?

The media reported about one of the engines being unearthed the day after it supposedly happened, why did they stop there?

Originally posted by hooper
Again, we have to put all this into the context of the time period. Like I mentioned before, in that time frame they were still searching for possible survivors at ground zero, the impending invasion of Afghanistan, the closing the stock market for the longest period in US history, all the survivor stories from DC and NYC, international reaction to 911 and the list goes on and on.

So what you are saying is that there was so many more important and newsworthy things to report about that both the major news media and the itty-bitty local news media didn't find it important enough to even squeeze in quick sentence in all their many articles about 9/11 they were posting everyday after that most of a 757 and the passenger remains were buried deep underground, something that was unprecedented in aviation history? Seriously hopper, you really believe this?

As you stated, they reported when the engine section was found and when the recorders were found. So what do you start reporting? Everytime another piece of metal is dug up?

Trying to convolute things again hooper? Never did I suggest the media should have reported when ever single piece of wreckage was supposedly dug up. But they did manage to squeeze in that one of the engines was dug up, so why couldn't they have squeezed in the more important and amazing news that most of the 757, along with its passengers, had been buried???

Originally posted by hooper
First, I don't know that parts of plane involved in a crash being embedded in the ground is "unprecedented". Where are you getting that? Are you suggesting that this was the first time in history that pieces of plane that crashed in soil were found embedded in the soil?

Good ol' hooper, always trying to obfuscate what I said. Typical behavior of a troll. You know very well I wrote "most of a 757 and the passenger remains were buried deep underground."

Second, where are you getting this thing about the passengers being "buried"?

Maybe you're not a troll after all, but you just have a very low IQ. Let's test it. If most of a plane had buried and no bodies were spotted above ground, where's the most likely place most of the passenger remains would be?

Or are you again assuming that based on these newspaper interviews with people that were not on the site?

I asked before and not sure you answered it (typical of you), where did all those different news agencies, the ambassadors, and book authors, including Lisa Beamer, get the notion that most of UA93 buried?

And just one more note - almost everything else being reported on was "unprecendented".

Terrorist attack happened on US soil? Yes
Plane crashes on US soil? Yes
Commercial plane mostly buries after crashes? Never before

Just to clarify something - do you think that the plane was "buried" like a unit with the passengers inside? Is that your understanding? Do you think they were digging up whole sections of the fuselage and carry on luggage came rolling out?

Typical trolling/lying behavior by you. Trying to make it look like I'm suggesting absurd things. You know very well I never said or suggesting anything of the like.

Let's see if you can start acting mature and stop being a troll from now on (I won't hold my breathe).

Please, no one post to Hooper untill he can post any kind of actual evidence to what he claims. Specailly that 95% of flight 93 was recovered and is in storage.



[edit on 21-2-2010 by REMISNE]

And another thing...If flight 93 impacted soft ground and it was buried by said impact,the earth would be mighty disturbed in a very artificial way.Settling would be a constant occurrance,even to this day.And the place would reek of kerosene which,being lighter than water and earth,would bubble up.Hmmm