reply to post by beta.services
Yes, these are very important questions I had to grapple with. Why didn't they just use the Bell to win the war?
They may have used one such device at low altitude and taken out an entire Soviet Army as I have read before in either Farrell or another source. But
the high altitude detonation would not only fry the Northern Hemisphere, but it wouls also fry Germany. My current view is that the Kecksburg Acorn
may have been an actual device dropped in the heart of German immigrant territory in the US to emphasize the Nazi threat in the backlash to their
assassination of JFK.
You see even if Kammler had blackmailed the US and USSR into backing off and that is prettty unlikely with Stalin it would have triggered an arms race
between Germany and the US and USSR. A much better solution was to let the US appear to win and rebuild Germany while the Nazis who as Farrell says
were never included in the surrender treaty went to their bases in Antarctica (probably begun in 1943 when the tide of war turned) and Argentina and
eventually on the moon and Mars and they would rule the US as their proxy under the threat of the detonation of the doomsday weapon.
That was I believe why the saucers appeared over DC when congress was considering nuking antarctica. Each saucer may have all had a Kammler doomsday
weapon on board which at low altitude could destroy the entire US.
The thorium and beryllium act as a neutron soource and the bismuth and mercury produce the deadly radioisotopes when hit by neutrons. The species were
probably taken to Giessen for mass spectrometry.
The research was done away from Germany and in the path of the advancing Red Army in case there was an accident.
The Bellwas taken into the mine and set on cermic tiles because it became radioactively hot in operation and the radioisotopes were probably tested on
plants and unfortunately humans. The rubber mats would be to shield the neutrons comiing from the Bell so that they did not interfere with the
experimental results.