It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
How do you know there is no proof?
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
How do you know there is no proof?
No proof has been presented.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
How do you know there is no proof?
No proof has been presented.
That doesn't mean that proof doesn't exist.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
How do you know there is no proof?
No proof has been presented.
That doesn't mean that proof doesn't exist.
No, but it also doesn't mean we should accept the hypothesis as fact just because evidence MAY exist.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by In nothing we trust
You can not investigate without facts. And no, there is no proof for any of those claims.
How do you know there is no proof?
No proof has been presented.
That doesn't mean that proof doesn't exist.
No, but it also doesn't mean we should accept the hypothesis as fact just because evidence MAY exist.
Maybe you should look into it.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
When someone uses the term 'thoroughly debunked', you can immediately dismiss the rest of anything they have to say. And, don't bother debating.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by hippomchippo
Sure, but let's start with the basics - Conspiracy Theory 101: where do you stand on the subject of 9/11?
Answer that, just so I know whether or not I need to waste anymore keystrokes on you.
Originally posted by davesidious
People say that every year, and we're still here. It's pessimistic nonsense. Unless you have actual evidence, to believe something cataclysmic is going to happen in 2012 is pointless, as it's just as likely to happen tomorrow. So, either be scared of every day, or be scared of none of them. To not do one or the other is to be grossly hypocritical.
[edit on 18-1-2010 by davesidious]
Originally posted by shasta9600
Originally posted by davesidious
People say that every year, and we're still here. It's pessimistic nonsense. Unless you have actual evidence, to believe something cataclysmic is going to happen in 2012 is pointless, as it's just as likely to happen tomorrow. So, either be scared of every day, or be scared of none of them. To not do one or the other is to be grossly hypocritical.
[edit on 18-1-2010 by davesidious]
I believe in the God of Bible and the prophecies that he gave us about these times that we are living in. That's all the evidence I need.
To me it's not a major issue of whether something major happens in 2012 or 3 months from now. It's not about specific dates.
I don't believe in extremes, such as the view that we have to either be scared every day or never scared at all. Every day is different and new. Some days are better than others. This has zero to do with being hypocritical.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by davesidious
No one gets 'shot down' - certainly not me. Typically "thoroughly debunked" is their last ditch effort.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again... it's real simple - if you're SO certain (either of you) that what you say is true (as I am), then put your money where your mouth is. (head over to the 2012 Bets thread)
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by hippomchippo
Sure, but let's start with the basics - Conspiracy Theory 101: where do you stand on the subject of 9/11?
Answer that, just so I know whether or not I need to waste anymore keystrokes on you.
That's completely irrelevant and only goes to show your ignorance.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by shasta9600
Originally posted by davesidious
People say that every year, and we're still here. It's pessimistic nonsense. Unless you have actual evidence, to believe something cataclysmic is going to happen in 2012 is pointless, as it's just as likely to happen tomorrow. So, either be scared of every day, or be scared of none of them. To not do one or the other is to be grossly hypocritical.
[edit on 18-1-2010 by davesidious]
I believe in the God of Bible and the prophecies that he gave us about these times that we are living in. That's all the evidence I need.
To me it's not a major issue of whether something major happens in 2012 or 3 months from now. It's not about specific dates.
I don't believe in extremes, such as the view that we have to either be scared every day or never scared at all. Every day is different and new. Some days are better than others. This has zero to do with being hypocritical.
The problem with the biblical prophecies is that it could pretty much refer to any point in time in the past 100-200 years, although it is fairly alarming how fast the other prophecies are coming true.