It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by UcantBserious
Again, you keep dancing around the real question here.
What does his private life have anything to do with his work?
Since when?
I don't get it. Everyone has different sexual profiles, for whatever reason, being them legal or not, and everyone has them.
A judge can be a sadomasoquist and still be a great judge and very fair when applying the law and jugding people for their actions.
A good professional attitude is when you can separete your private life from your professional life. And NOTHING has come up that takes that way from Ritter.
I still don't get the point where showing genitals at home, to a young girl, has anything to do with NUCLEAR WEAPONS... Apart from the common basis that in both cases, they use things that can f*** up the world. lol
So far all he's done is sent video of himself whacking off to what he thought was a 15 year old girl. He's shown a history of this behavior going back to 2001.
People here are saying that he's being setup for speaking out against Bush.
What if he was blackmailed into making those comments?
I would not be able to rely heavily on his information again and would have to question everything that he has done to this point.
So that would have an effect on his work.
Don't fall for those making equivocations, excuses, focusing on miniscule irrelevencies