It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Meaning continuation of the no fly zones over Iraq indefinately as they (Oil for Food profiteers) raked in the cash from the oil for food UN congame that was going on.
A press release issued in November by the Barrett Township police noted that the incident wasn't the first time Ritter had been arrested on similar charges, but that he had not been formally charged.
Ritter was reportedly charged in a June 2001 sex sting in New York, but the case was dismissed. He had been charged with attempted child endangerment after arranging to meet a person he thought was a 16-year-old girl at a fast-food restaurant. The girl was actually an undercover police officer.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
For any of these to be valid, we have to trust his judgement and integrity, both of these are now in doubt.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I'm suprised that no one has brought up the subject of how he was caught. Has he actually broken a law? He is being charged with exposing himself to a minor, but he actually never did. He may have exposed himself to a female police officer pretending to be a 15 year old girl, but, he never did expose himself to a minor.
Ritter was reportedly charged in a June 2001 sex sting in New York, but the case was dismissed. He had been charged with attempted child endangerment after arranging to meet a person he thought was a 16-year-old girl at a fast-food restaurant. The girl was actually an undercover police officer.
The New York Post reported Ritter was caught in a similar case in April 2001 involving a 14-year-old girl, but he was never charged.
Originally posted by polit
Yeah, he was definitely set up - it just had to be a set up:
Ritter was reportedly charged in a June 2001 sex sting in New York, but the case was dismissed. He had been charged with attempted child endangerment after arranging to meet a person he thought was a 16-year-old girl at a fast-food restaurant. The girl was actually an undercover police officer.
His work is based on his views, assessments and evaluations. For any of these to be valid, we have to trust his judgement and integrity, both of these are now in doubt.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Just out of idle curiousity, did you trust his judgement and integrity beforehand or is this simply a chickenhawk's wet dream come true?