It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former Chief U.N. Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter Nabbed in Teen Sex Sting

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Former Chief U.N. Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter Nabbed in Teen Sex Sting


www.foxnews.com

Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter was arrested in a Pennsylvania sex sting in November on a litany of charges involving a lewd Internet conversation with a person he thought was a 15-year-old girl.

Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an undercover cop posing as the teenage girl. He declined to discuss the charges Thursday when reporters visited his New York residence.
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 01:43 PM
link   
Ritter was critical of the Bush administrations handling with respect to the mysterious weapons of mass destruction claims. Could this be payback or a smear campaign to completely discredit Ritter once and for all. Not too many people, even when proven innocent, tend to completely walk away from issues involving pedophilia. Or as the story claims is Ritter just a loser. The investigation was lengthy so it appears as though law enforcement was cautious.

brill

www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   
Well Ritter has been a major critic of the entire government and UN strategy. He revealed many of their secrets and hidden truths.

He opened a lot of people's eyes to what is really going on in government and geopolitics.

This sounds exactly like a payback hit job honestly.

I know it sounds gross but, bear with me.

The ONLY way to prove this story is true is by showing me the Internet transcripts AND the video of him beating off.

Without this evidence they have NOTHING on the guy.

However the powers that be fail to understand one important thing. Even if the guy is hard up for teenage chicks, that does not mean he is a liar. It just means he needs to control himself more around women.

This does not discredit his past statements in any way, EVEN if it IS TRUE!



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by brill
 


Top UN guy caught being evil while keeping up the appearance of being o good guy .... where is the news ?

the rest of those guys just didn't get caught yet



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by muzzleflash
This does not discredit his past statements in any way, EVEN if it IS TRUE!


Though it shouldn't discredit his past statements it will certainly sway a lot of people to rethink their position on Ritter. People tend to be somewhat nonchalant on matters that have sustenance but you mix children into the equation, especially sex, and they never forget. Just look at generic politicians and their sex scandals as an example. I think regardless of the outcome here, and this appears to be his 2nd sex scandal, Ritter's credibility is in the toilet.

brill



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:21 PM
link   
To pervs everywhere.

Teenage girls are NOT turned on by your genitals. Usually grown women aren't either. Genital sneezes are not actually that attractive.

No matter how many times you get all worked up about it, I promise, it is JUST you. Even if the other person says anything you find sexy, they are doing so DESPITE the fact that you are a creepy idiot who thinks that your genitals are some sort of fancy attractive art work.

[edit on 2010/1/14 by Aeons]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by pilot70
reply to post by brill
 


Top UN guy caught being evil while keeping up the appearance of being o good guy .... where is the news ?

the rest of those guys just didn't get caught yet


I can tell you are not aware of anything about Ritter.

He went against the grain and exposed many lies TPTB were spewing.

He gave TPTB a big run for their money, they tried very hard to shut him up.

He is against the wars in Iraq and all that. Huge Anti-War guy.

He revealed the truth about Iraqi WMD program as HE was the guy who Inspected it!

(He said they had NO active reasonable capability to create WMDs)

Thus he debunked the "reasons for going to war" before anyone else did.

[edit on 14-1-2010 by muzzleflash]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by brill


Though it shouldn't discredit his past statements it will certainly sway a lot of people to rethink their position on Ritter.


And those people are pretty retarded if they fall for it that easily.

This is akin to saying Einstein's work is "debunked" and "not credible anymore" because he tried to screw teenage girls.

Not saying he did, just a hypothetical point.

People can be so dumb. I guess they are truly slaves after all!



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   
Someone has to I.D. this man's tallywacker !

It's the only way !



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:43 PM
link   
Being a stupid perv doesn't mean you are bad at your job.

Being good at your job doesn't mean you aren't a stupid perv.

[edit on 2010/1/14 by Aeons]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by muzzleflash

Originally posted by pilot70
reply to post by brill
 


Top UN guy caught being evil while keeping up the appearance of being o good guy .... where is the news ?

the rest of those guys just didn't get caught yet


I can tell you are not aware of anything about Ritter.

He went against the grain and exposed many lies TPTB were spewing.

He gave TPTB a big run for their money, they tried very hard to shut him up.

He is against the wars in Iraq and all that. Huge Anti-War guy.

He revealed the truth about Iraqi WMD program as HE was the guy who Inspected it!

(He said they had NO active reasonable capability to create WMDs)

Thus he debunked the "reasons for going to war" before anyone else did.

[edit on 14-1-2010 by muzzleflash]


Well good for him, but what does any of that have to do with the fact that he was caught in an underage sex sting?

Some people are implying that because of his current actions that his past actions may be overlooked or dismissed.

Sounds like you're implying that because of his past actions, that his current actions should be overlooked and dismissed.

Maybe I'm understanding wrong.

The man was caught masturbating over a webcam to what he assumed was an underaged 15 yr old girl that he met in a chat room.

I really don't care what he has done or could have done for or against the government. None of that excuses this man.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:50 PM
link   
All those Bush bashers who placed this guy on a pedastal just got owned.
Nothing he ever was a part of has any credibillity left.
If you think it does, would anyone take a pedo into court as their star witness? If you think they would, you can't be serious.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


I couldn't agree with you more! I was wondering myself why a grown man would think a teenage girl would find that sexy or as a turn on. If anything it would make him appear pathetic and sad to the girl.

As a young woman, I can promise that it would not turn me on to see any man (husband included) in that kind of "situation"

Thanks, your post made me laugh for the first time today!



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by UcantBserious
 


Oh really?

So let me get this straight...


...just because the guy showed his penis to a girl in the webcam, that means that there were nuclear weapons in Iraq?

Yeah.. Totally related the two subjects.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by UcantBserious
 


What does this have to do with WMD's? You do know you're commiting a BIG fallacy right?



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 03:52 PM
link   
Star for muzzleflash. This was a set-up to discredit Rittter for his criticism of the Bush administration. I knew that they would start using the net and so called "kiddie porn" etc to target enemies of the administration. So easy to do when you have access to everyones accounts. Watch what you say, or you'll be hauled off to jail for talking to that "12 year old girl" too. Our tax dollars sadly at work, against us.

[edit on 14-1-2010 by Asktheanimals]
Wanna prove his guilt? Show us the weenie!

[edit on 14-1-2010 by Asktheanimals]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Personally I'd leave politics out of it. If he did it, and it's not a set up or payback. Then he should face full prosecution as well as the strictest penalty available........no special deals.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
This was a set-up to discredit Rittter for his criticism of the Bush administration. I knew that they would start using the net and so called "kiddie porn" etc to target enemies of the administration.


Didn't the Bush Administration get replaced almost a year ago? I think the Obama Administration (whatever in the hell that is) is now in charge. Kind of late to start discrediting the guy now. Maybe if this happened back in 2006 there might be something to it.

How about this plain and simple. The guy's a pervert.

Now I have to question his credability about everything. People here are saying that he was setup by the Bush Administration to discredit his claims. I have to ask if the opposite might be true? Maybe he was forced into making those claims because somebody had this information and threatened to go public with it. The sword can cut both ways here.

Food for thought.

If the Bush Administration could pull off everything that it is being given credit for, how in the hell did Obama get into the White House?



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by UcantBserious
All those Bush bashers who placed this guy on a pedastal just got owned.
Nothing he ever was a part of has any credibillity left.
If you think it does, would anyone take a pedo into court as their star witness? If you think they would, you can't be serious.


This will be a delight to the chicken hawks, to be sure. It takes nothing from his claims of fraud in the run-up to the Iraq war...but yes it has to please a lot of people in the hopes that it will discount his testimony.

I find it difficult to understand why folks might crow about that, though, knowing that he has been disengaged by other means...not by the veracity of his statements.

But I suppose that in some circles, that doesn't matter.

There's a larger story here...like Spitzer...being caught out on a morals issue before dropping a dime on the bad guys. See a pattern? Does it matter?



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
reply to post by JIMC5499
 


Now that is a good conspiracy.

Pervs have a track record of being longtime pervs. This guy was compromised from the getgo. Who was pulling his strings back then is the real question here. Stood out on a limb my a$$, he had to say what he said or else is more like it. Everything he ever said or did in an official capacity can now be viewed as him playing out someone elses agenda because he had a big dark secret being held over his head.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join