posted on Jan, 6 2010 @ 07:56 AM
This is a report with the leading Holocaust Scholar Robert Jan Van Pelt, what I've found interesting.
There is one sentence, which is... hmmm, strange a bit.
Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove . . . it has become part of our inherited knowledge.
So my question is, if a leading expert in this report says they can prove only ONE PERCENT of these claims, why they're suprised when people have
doubts regarding this matter? And also if this is true, and why a Holocaust expert and scholar would lie, why the officials are saying this is the
most documented event in history, while it's clearly can be heard from an official expert, it's not.
Please debate about this matter in a civilized manner. Please skip any sort of racism in this thread. But I'd like to hear both sides' opinion in
this matter, because I find it really interesting.
[edit on 6-1-2010 by Sharrow]