It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Originally posted by Janky Red
Do you not recognize that the same document gives the state the power to create laws and enforce them?
Georgia state constitution:
Paragraph X. Bill of attainder; ex post facto laws; and retroactive laws. No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or laws impairing the obligation of contract or making irrevocable grant of special privileges or immunities shall be passed.
Paragraph V. Specific limitations. (c) The General Assembly shall not have the power to authorize anywhich may have the effect of or which is intended to have the effect of defeating or lessening competition, or encouraging a monopoly, which are hereby declared to be unlawful and void.
contract or agreement
But I don't need the state constitution to tell me that people have an inherent right to transact without state interference.
[edit on 4-1-2010 by mnemeth1]
Paragraph X -
and
V
This fellow did NOT enter into contract with the state, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN A FOOD LICENSE and if he did he would have been subject two paragraph II and this would be a non issue, he would be in business and making his money and biscuits.
Georgia Food Act (section 26-2-25) "it shall be unlawful for any persom to operate a food sales establishment without having first obtained a license from the commissioner"
www.foodscience.caes.uga.edu...
Originally posted by abecedarian
@ about 3:47
"Let's bust that guy for biscuits and gravy. That's a gateway drug you know. That usually leads to a fried porkchop or something."
On the other hand... operating without a business license and likely no health permit is illegal.
[edit on 1/4/2010 by abecedarian]
Originally posted by daddio
Originally posted by abecedarian
@ about 3:47
"Let's bust that guy for biscuits and gravy. That's a gateway drug you know. That usually leads to a fried porkchop or something."
On the other hand... operating without a business license and likely no health permit is illegal.
[edit on 1/4/2010 by abecedarian]
Actually it is NOT. If you have family and friends over and they eat at your place and give you gifts, you are trading one thing for another, COMMERCE, is not present.
Free TRADE, trade is the key word. He was trading his homemade goods for remuneration. His labor is worth something. His time and talent is worth something, NONE OF THIS can be taxed. A Corporation however, EMPLOYS others to manufacture the goods and these are generally sold at a higher cost FOR PROFIT. Health is HIS responsibility and NOT the States.
I could explain the whole economic system here but I know many will understand. It is the few who do not that are part of the problem and not part of the solution.
ALSO. cops are nothing more than corporate security guards, they have to file an oath of office within 15 days of being hired, if they do not, THEY ARE COMMITING A FEDERAL FELONY, impersonating an officer. I can see by the video, there is entrapment, and deciet. This guy could get off easy and make a huge sum for false arrest and willful neglect or dereliction of duty. The Sheriff is the ONLY true law enforcement official.
This is retarded and just goes to show the communist nature of the police force and the mentality of this sad country.
Originally posted by Janky Red
... pony up, we all have to do it if we go in his line of work. Why should he be special?
Originally posted by downisreallyup
This whole thread is just ridiculous. The people elected those who will enact laws as they see fit. You have a REPUBLIC, remember? Well, those people you elected have determined how to do things so that risk is minimized and problems are avoided. That is what they decided on your behalf, because you elected them and hired them to do just that.
If you wanted a different outcome, go and change it. Do what they did. Get elected and then use persuasion to convince your other elected co-workers, so that you can change things. The people elect those to run the show, and then they are silent or whispering about what they want.
Wake up folks! You never really had the freedom you thought you had. There have always been rulers ruling over you who did things you would not like.
Back in the founder's day men would be publicly humiliated, whipped, or even killed, right in the town square. I'd love to see what people said if Obama tried that. The founder's had slaves too. During Lincoln's time, states tried to get out of the U.S.A. and a bloody war was waged. In 1913 the Fed Reserve Act was launched, but before that, there were bank failures all the time and people lost everything. Study your history. There has NEVER been a time in the world that people had it any better than you have right now. If it wasn't one thing, it was another.
This guy selling food from his house broke the law... plain and simple. You don't like the law? WELL THEN, get off your lazy rear-end, get off of ATS, and get out there to change it. All you have to do is get a million signatures of other Americans who agree with you, and you can get an initiative on the ballot for voting. Then the entire state will vote and decide if they want to let people sell food from their homes. HAHAHA! Good Luck on that one.
What you people fail to realize is that in a democracy/republic, you only need a simple majority for things to occur. That means 51% of the people need to want something, and it will happen. That also means that 49% of you will be unhappy and want to bitch and moan. Well, guess what? With this issue and many others like it, you are in the 49% minority. I can assure you that MOST people WANT food regulations. Do you hear that? MOST want it, so the system is working just as planned. You can complain all you want that you didn't get your way, but the fact is, in the U.S.A there used to be lots of cases of food illness and poisoning, so people got angry and demanded that the government do something about it... and they did.
Don't forget... you are not alone on this planet, and it is a fact that MANY people don't agree with you. That is the downside of living on a highly-populated planet. It's not the government's fault, it's actually yours. Who told you to go and have all those babies after WWII? Did you think you could just go and populate the earth like that and there would be no ramifications? Silly humans.
[edit on 5-1-2010 by downisreallyup]
Originally posted by DJMSN
reply to post by downisreallyup
So if you buy say a tainted burger from say I don't know maybe "Jack in the Box" and become ill (God Forbid by the way I wouldn't wish anyone ill)
and hire a lawyer to sue...who do you think comes out the better for it?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Janky Red
... pony up, we all have to do it if we go in his line of work. Why should he be special?
This one comes out a lot. Especially regarding tax evasion.
It's like all the little frogs in the warm water getting really pissed at the one who jumped out before it began to boil.
Rather than jump out with him all the frogs cry "it isnt fair, he should be boiling to death with us."
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Originally posted by downisreallyup
This whole thread is just ridiculous. The people elected those who will enact laws as they see fit. You have a REPUBLIC, remember? Well, those people you elected have determined how to do things so that risk is minimized and problems are avoided. That is what they decided on your behalf, because you elected them and hired them to do just that.
If you wanted a different outcome, go and change it. Do what they did. Get elected and then use persuasion to convince your other elected co-workers, so that you can change things. The people elect those to run the show, and then they are silent or whispering about what they want.
Wake up folks! You never really had the freedom you thought you had. There have always been rulers ruling over you who did things you would not like.
Back in the founder's day men would be publicly humiliated, whipped, or even killed, right in the town square. I'd love to see what people said if Obama tried that. The founder's had slaves too. During Lincoln's time, states tried to get out of the U.S.A. and a bloody war was waged. In 1913 the Fed Reserve Act was launched, but before that, there were bank failures all the time and people lost everything. Study your history. There has NEVER been a time in the world that people had it any better than you have right now. If it wasn't one thing, it was another.
This guy selling food from his house broke the law... plain and simple. You don't like the law? WELL THEN, get off your lazy rear-end, get off of ATS, and get out there to change it. All you have to do is get a million signatures of other Americans who agree with you, and you can get an initiative on the ballot for voting. Then the entire state will vote and decide if they want to let people sell food from their homes. HAHAHA! Good Luck on that one.
What you people fail to realize is that in a democracy/republic, you only need a simple majority for things to occur. That means 51% of the people need to want something, and it will happen. That also means that 49% of you will be unhappy and want to bitch and moan. Well, guess what? With this issue and many others like it, you are in the 49% minority. I can assure you that MOST people WANT food regulations. Do you hear that? MOST want it, so the system is working just as planned. You can complain all you want that you didn't get your way, but the fact is, in the U.S.A there used to be lots of cases of food illness and poisoning, so people got angry and demanded that the government do something about it... and they did.
Don't forget... you are not alone on this planet, and it is a fact that MANY people don't agree with you. That is the downside of living on a highly-populated planet. It's not the government's fault, it's actually yours. Who told you to go and have all those babies after WWII? Did you think you could just go and populate the earth like that and there would be no ramifications? Silly humans.
[edit on 5-1-2010 by downisreallyup]
We have a constitutional republic, and the people doing the whipping were British agents. Don't forget the word "constitutional" in there. That's what prevents 51% from enslaving the other 49.
Thomas Jefferson was one of the biggest abolitionists. He couldn't free his slaves because, like property, he was obligated to keep them due to debt.
[edit on 5-1-2010 by mnemeth1]