posted on Nov, 28 2009 @ 06:55 PM
Even if blonds go extinct, there's no need to panic. The universal characteristics that determine beauty are big eyes, high eyebrow, small noses,
small lips and high cheekbone. I would add symmetrical eyes as part of them. I have NOT seen a study where hair color or eye color is a factor. And in
fact, if you give a White girl a big nose and small eyes, then she will not look beautiful, no matter what her hair or eye color is. Conversely, if
you give a Black girl big eyes and small noses, then she will look beautiful, no matter what her hair or eye color is.
I used to make a lot of beautiful celebrity videos on youtube, and I can tell you that two of those characteristics are very true, that is big eyes
and small noses are basically universal traits, when it comes to attractiveness.
Symmetrical eyes and small lips are almost universal.
Here's another shocker. White people are not genetically superior as much as they are and (have been) economically superior. The only reason White
people seem more blessed genetically is because they have always been well-ahead economically, usually by oppressing other countries.
When I tried to compare the only Asian country(Hong Kong) that has a GDP per capita close to the U.S, their quality of women are no worse, and in my
most objective opinion, the most beautiful woman in the world is an Asian.
In my opinion, assuming that economic conditions are equal, then evolution favors short and thin people the most(not just with looks, but also bigger
brain-size to body-size ratio, and extended lifespan, and if you missed my other post, then just google "calorie restriction"), for the simple
reason that they require the least energy.
This is why, IMO, short people are generally better looking and more cute than tall people, the younger sibling tends to be better looking than the
old, and in fact, 80% of the world's most beautiful celebrities are under the average height.
Here is where diet comes in. The nose is made of the same two things that make you grow, and that is protein and calcium. The lips are made of fat and
protein, so you can see why eating less in general is beneficial. At the very least, you should avoid milk, as it makes the nose bone grow, and you
DEFINITELY don't want that thing to grow.
Avoiding protein is a little tougher, because small eyes are caused by weak muscles and sun exposure(google epicanthic fold.) And if we were to
compare the Asian diet of rice(carbohydrate-based) and White diet of fast-food(protein-based), we would see why Asians generally have smaller eyes.
The sun exposure is only a theory, but if that's accurate, then it would explain exactly why economic differences lead to differences in eye-shape,
as "modern countries" tend to work inside more.
In my opinion, there are virtually no "genetic" or "non-controllable" differences, when it comes to beauty, even among Blacks. Excuse me for
making a generalization here(and if you're offended, then just know that it's not really genetic, and in the end, that's what really cause one to
be offended), but the reasons that Blacks are considered the least attractive is simply because of the fact that their noses(and lips) are much
bigger(and trust me, I have looked at a ton of pictures, of all races.) Blacks happen to be the tallest, so we can see another correlation between
height and looks here.
Anyway, if China was a capitalist country and had a GDP per capita of over 40000, you would see 4 times as many beautiful women as over here. If you
give a Black nation a GDP of over 40000, and assume that they eat a lot less, then IMO, you would have the same ratio of beautiful women as over here.
This is not some empty claims, this is after some very surprising observations about how closely a country's celebrities, not only in quantity, but
also quality, vary with the GDP per capita(if you
want to know more, then watch my videos(ChuAnFanBoy) called Grand Unified Theory of Racial..on youtube