posted on Nov, 20 2009 @ 10:07 AM
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
I know for a fact that some of the replies posted on this thread are untruths.
Some of the things said can be picked up from anywhere, just read a few posts on some of the threads on ATS and you get the general idea...any fool
could purport to being an illuminati / informed being / spiritual being in human guise or anything else for that matter.
Furthermore though there are some powerful bloodlines, they aren't the deciders, just slightly higher up puppets on the puppet scale..they too are
shielded from the most sacred knowledge and power.
This OP really and truly appears to be an attempt at deceipt to those willing to listen and it very much reminds me of a forum once where some of the
posters were so egotistical and couldn't stand their posts being disagreed (probably a medical condition) that they used their ISP multiple email
address / screen name facility to the max and were found to be posting to themselves with self appreciating remarks pertaining to be from some other
poster...the entire charade was a totally fictional egofest and this looks entirely the same.
One would presume posters on ATS would be more wary of such pretence given the nature of conspiracy theories and the fact that most are / should be
looking for reality in very real terms.
I really do not have time for this verbal swordfight, but it would seem that I must.
First Statement: What an interesting sentence, one that anyone who disagrees with my message could say by the way. But the interesting part about it
is the fact that you made that statement, but did not provide any examples to support it. One would think that if you truly believed in what you said,
you would have at least given one example and an explanation as to why it is an "untruth"...especially on my last day here...interesting, but you
are still open to provide an example, before my last post, so I can look at it, but I am sure you wont.
Second Statement: Again, you make statements but provide no examples as to why it is the case. Do you have a "hidden" agenda here? No, I believe it
is pretty much out in the open.
Third Statement: You are correct, there are some powerful Bloodlines, who are not the "deciders" (to use your term), I could have told you that
Fourth Statement: Again you are shifting the conversation to these vague "other threads". You are subtlety implying that I am doing exactly what the
"stated" (even though it was not) threads OP did. Now, I have stated that I was using two ISP addresses, and the moderators surely know, and I have
no need for multiple accounts, which they would know if I had any. I am in full control of my "ego" but I seriously doubt you are.
Fifth Statement: You are clearly attempting to persuade the readers into your non-productive line of thinking by indirectly stating that if they do
not agree with what you are saying they are not "wary of such pretence given the nature of conspiracy theories and the fact that most are / should be
looking for reality in very real terms.” Do you put out propaganda for a living? Perhaps U.S. Army Psychological Operations (PsyOps)?