reply to post by HotSauce
LOL, spend a few billion to bring back 20 million worth of minerals from some part of the solar system.
And there's part of my rant- IT JUST SHOULDN'T. Who came up with these numbers? Why does it cost so much to put anything in space? We hear of all
these new ways to launch stuff- do we see them? NO. Here's something to wrap the brain around: Nasa spends dual digit thousand, possibly 3 digit
thousand to get pics and data from a weather balloon so far up, it almost could go into orbit. A school did the same thing for a few HUNDRED. You have
model rocket enthusiasts who I am sure can put a rocket into orbit On a fraction of NASA's budget. I'll bet, if I had the $$, I could get a probe to
the moon- IF The PTB and NASA didn't do anything to botch it up on me.
Artificial gravity- achieved by finding a way to rotate a ship a certain amount of revolutions a minute. Is the ISS built to do that? NO. We went to
the moon in 1969. Why haven't we done it again? Why the screwing around? Why do we see Nasa play with some new toy, only to discard it (even tho it
worked), or waste money on some mission (think the water prospecting ones) that brings in the same tired results: "duh... we're not reeeeallly
sure"- and then, they do it again, and again, and again? We're getting a whole lot of NOTHING from an agency that's whining about needing more $$.
Do I need to even point out the disgusting, HUGE debris field around our planet, full of junk, old satellites, and who knows what else? An amazing
waste of our planet's resources right there, and obviously hazardous!
I say that mining of anything, including the moon can be done cheaply, safely, and effectively! I say billions have been wasted on showboating and
making the public feel like our 'space' agency is doing something. When all it is is a magician with some moldy old tricks and a sickly rabbit in
his hat.