posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 11:56 AM
reply to post by Phage
although this guy does have some valid points, it doesnt necessarily mean that sitchin is wrong with everything he talks about. He interprets glyphs
and the like the way he sees them. Why on earth would someone go thru all the trouble of writing 6 books, just to write a bunch of crap?? That
doesn't make sense either. Im not saying everything he talks about is true. Everything is opinion, based on someones interpretation. Even if the
person has got a degree in this or that, doesnt mean they are anymore right than the next guy. its still just opinion.
Imo, Sitchin's story of our past is interesting to say the least, and although not all of it may be accurate, it doesnt mean its all bunk.
Question: Have u read any of sitchin's books urself, or do u just take it for granted that ur source is right, and sitchin's is wrong?
The bible, and all the other books out there that "supposedly" are the truth of our history, have errors in them too. So, i think its better to
take in all the information we find, so we can formulate in our own minds if it resonates with us or not. I dont believe in any one thing, i like to
keep an open mind about it all.
Noone in my opinion is an expert on this type of stuff, its all just opinions.
[edit on 6-12-2009 by eArth33lr]